Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.
School of Social Work, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;22(1):1936. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14335-x.
Little research is available regarding vaccination attitudes among those recently diagnosed with COVID-19. This is important to investigate, particularly among those experiencing mild-to-moderate illness, given the ongoing need to improve uptake of both initial vaccine series and booster doses, and the divergent ways such an experience could impact attitudes.
From September 3 - November 12, 2021, all patients enrolled in Baylor Scott & White's "COVID-19 Digital Care Journey for Home Monitoring" were invited to participate in an online survey that included questions about vaccination status and attitudes/opinions regarding COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccines. Following an item asking about accordance of COVID-19 vaccination with religious/personal beliefs, participants were asked to describe those beliefs and how they relate to taking/not taking the vaccine.
Of 8,075 patients age ≥ 18 years diagnosed with COVID-19 and invited to join the survey during the study period, 3242 (40.2%) were fully vaccinated. In contrast, among the 149 who completed the questionnaire, 95(63.8%) reported full vaccination. Responses differed significantly between vaccination groups. The vaccinated group strongly agreed that COVID-19 is a major public health problem, the vaccines are safe and effective, and their decision to vaccinate included considering community benefit. The unvaccinated group responded neutrally to most questions addressing safety and public health aspects of the vaccine, while strongly disagreeing with statements regarding vaccine effectiveness and other preventative public health measures. The vaccinated group strongly agreed that taking the vaccine accorded with their religious/personal beliefs, while the unvaccinated group was neutral. In qualitative analysis of the free text responses "risk perception/calculation" and "no impact" of religious/personal beliefs on vaccination decisions were frequent themes/subthemes in both groups, but beliefs related to the "greater good" were a strong driver among the vaccinated, while statements emphasizing "individual choice" were a third frequent theme for the unvaccinated.
Our results show that two of the three factors that drive vaccine hesitancy (complacency, and lack of confidence in the vaccines) are present among unvaccinated adults recently diagnosed with COVID-19. They also show that beliefs emphasizing the importance of the greater good promote public health participation.
关于最近感染 COVID-19 的人群的疫苗接种态度,研究甚少。鉴于需要提高初始疫苗系列和加强剂量的接种率,以及这种经历可能以不同的方式影响态度,因此调查这一点非常重要。特别是对于那些经历轻度至中度疾病的人。
2021 年 9 月 3 日至 11 月 12 日,贝勒斯科特和怀特的“COVID-19 家庭监测数字护理之旅”中所有入组的患者都被邀请参加一项在线调查,该调查包括关于疫苗接种状况以及对 COVID-19 和 COVID-19 疫苗的态度/意见的问题。在询问 COVID-19 疫苗接种是否符合宗教/个人信仰的问题之后,要求参与者描述这些信仰以及它们与接种/不接种疫苗的关系。
在研究期间,年龄≥18 岁并被邀请参加调查的 8075 名感染 COVID-19 的患者中,有 3242 人(40.2%)完全接种了疫苗。相比之下,在完成问卷调查的 149 人中,有 95 人(63.8%)报告完全接种了疫苗。两组之间的回答存在显著差异。接种组强烈认为 COVID-19 是一个重大的公共卫生问题,疫苗是安全有效的,他们接种疫苗的决定包括考虑社区利益。未接种组对大多数涉及疫苗安全性和公共卫生方面的问题的回答持中立态度,而对疫苗有效性和其他预防公共卫生措施的声明则强烈反对。接种组强烈认为接种疫苗符合他们的宗教/个人信仰,而未接种组则持中立态度。在对自由文本回复的定性分析中,“风险感知/计算”和宗教/个人信仰对疫苗接种决策的“无影响”是两组的常见主题/子主题,但强调“更大利益”的信仰是接种组的主要驱动力,而强调“个人选择”的声明则是未接种组的第三个常见主题。
我们的研究结果表明,在最近感染 COVID-19 的未接种成年人中,有两个导致疫苗犹豫的三个因素(自满和对疫苗缺乏信心)。它们还表明,强调“更大利益”的信念促进了公共卫生参与。