• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植物园能否成为蜻蜓目分类和功能多样性的避难所?以卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰植物园(西班牙)为例。

Can botanic gardens serve as refuges for taxonomic and functional diversity of Odonata? The case of the botanic garden of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain).

作者信息

Pinilla-Rosa Manuel, García-Saúco Guillermo, Santiago Alejandro, Ferrandis Pablo, Méndez Marcos

机构信息

University Rey Juan Carlos, C/ Tulipán s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Madrid Spain.

Botanic garden of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. de La Mancha s/n, 02006 Albacete, Spain.

出版信息

Limnology (Tokyo). 2023;24(1):37-50. doi: 10.1007/s10201-022-00704-3. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10201-022-00704-3
PMID:36258754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9559554/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In a scenario with declining biodiversity and habitat loss, botanic gardens could serve as refuges for invertebrates, but the opportunities they offer for animal conservation are still poorly understood. Odonata is a good model group for conservation studies, because it includes threatened species and responses to habitat disturbance are well documented. In this study, we assessed the role of the botanic garden of Castilla-La Mancha in Spain as a refuge for members of Odonata by analysing their taxonomic and functional diversity. We explored if the small size of the botanic garden might constrain the taxonomic diversity of Odonata and if low habitat diversity might limit their functional diversity. We sampled adult Odonata from five water bodies along a gradient of human impact and characterized the Odonata communities based on 12 functional traits in Odonata. We used a species-area relationship to control for differences in the size of water bodies. Compared with natural lakes, the Odonata communities contained less species and their functional diversity was lower in the botanic garden ponds, where generalist species were basically hosted. Despite these limitations, the botanic garden ponds hosted the number of species expected for natural water bodies with the moderate surface area and functional diversity, thereby demonstrating that they are a valuable habitat for Odonata in an urban environment. Appropriate management involving the removal of exotic fish and habitat diversification, including creating lotic environments, would increase the taxonomic and functional diversity of Odonata in this urban system.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10201-022-00704-3.

摘要

未标注

在生物多样性下降和栖息地丧失的情况下,植物园可作为无脊椎动物的避难所,但人们对其提供的动物保护机会仍知之甚少。蜻蜓目是保护研究的一个良好模型类群,因为它包括受威胁物种,且对栖息地干扰的反应有充分记录。在本研究中,我们通过分析西班牙卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰植物园中蜻蜓目成员的分类和功能多样性,评估了该植物园作为蜻蜓目避难所的作用。我们探讨了植物园面积较小是否会限制蜻蜓目的分类多样性,以及栖息地多样性较低是否会限制其功能多样性。我们沿着人类影响梯度,从五个水体中采集成年蜻蜓目昆虫样本,并根据蜻蜓目的12个功能性状对蜻蜓目群落进行了特征描述。我们使用物种-面积关系来控制水体大小的差异。与天然湖泊相比,植物园池塘中的蜻蜓目群落物种较少,其功能多样性较低,且主要栖息着广适性物种。尽管存在这些限制,但植物园池塘中拥有中等表面积和功能多样性的天然水体所预期的物种数量,从而表明它们是城市环境中蜻蜓目的宝贵栖息地。采取包括清除外来鱼类和使栖息地多样化(包括营造流水环境)在内的适当管理措施,将增加该城市系统中蜻蜓目的分类和功能多样性。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10201-022-00704-3获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
Can botanic gardens serve as refuges for taxonomic and functional diversity of Odonata? The case of the botanic garden of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain).植物园能否成为蜻蜓目分类和功能多样性的避难所?以卡斯蒂利亚-拉曼恰植物园(西班牙)为例。
Limnology (Tokyo). 2023;24(1):37-50. doi: 10.1007/s10201-022-00704-3. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
Highway stormwater ponds as islands of Odonata diversity in an agricultural landscape.高速公路雨水池塘是农业景观中蜻蜓多样性的岛屿。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155774. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155774. Epub 2022 May 7.
3
Strengthening the scientific contribution of botanic gardens to the second phase of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation.加强植物园对全球植物保护战略第二阶段的科学贡献。
Bot J Linn Soc. 2011;166(3):267-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01156.x.
4
Water quality effects on dragonfly and damselfly nymph communities: A comparison of urban and natural ponds.水质对蜻蜓和豆娘若虫群落的影响:城市和自然池塘的比较。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Aug;263(Pt B):114472. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114472. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
5
Plants, water quality and land cover as drivers of Odonata assemblages in urban ponds.植物、水质和土地覆盖物对城市池塘蜻蜓类组合的驱动作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 15;773:145467. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145467. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
6
Botanic gardens should lead the way to create a "Garden Earth" in the Anthropocene.植物园应引领潮流,在人类世创造一个“花园地球”。
Plant Divers. 2017 Nov 24;39(6):331-337. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2017.11.003. eCollection 2017 Dec.
7
Resolving whether botanic gardens are on the road to conservation or a pathway for plant invasions.确定植物园是走上了保护之路还是成为了植物入侵的途径。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):816-24. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12426. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
8
Ex situ conservation of plant diversity in the world's botanic gardens.世界植物园中的植物多样性就地保护。
Nat Plants. 2017 Oct;3(10):795-802. doi: 10.1038/s41477-017-0019-3. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
Botanic gardens are an untapped resource for studying the functional ecology of tropical plants.植物园是研究热带植物功能生态学的未开发资源。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Nov 19;374(1763):20170390. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0390.
10
Predation and competition drive trait diversity across space and time.捕食和竞争驱动着跨越时空的特征多样性。
Ecology. 2023 Dec;104(12):e4182. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4182. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Rich and abundant spider communities result from enhanced web capture breadth and reduced overlap in urban greenspaces.丰富多样的蜘蛛群落是由于城市绿地中增强的网捕获广度和减少的重叠导致的。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Apr;31(3):e02282. doi: 10.1002/eap.2282. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
2
Rapid functional traits turnover in boreal dragonfly communities (Odonata).北方蜻蜓群落(Odonata)中快速的功能性状更替。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 21;10(1):15411. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71685-5.
3
Arthropod diversity in two Historic Gardens in the Azores, Portugal.葡萄牙亚速尔群岛两个历史花园中的节肢动物多样性
Biodivers Data J. 2020 Aug 6;8:e54749. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e54749. eCollection 2020.
4
Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances.元分析显示,陆地昆虫丰度下降,但淡水昆虫丰度增加。
Science. 2020 Apr 24;368(6489):417-420. doi: 10.1126/science.aax9931.
5
Why do bugs perish? Range size and local vulnerability traits as surrogates of Odonata extinction risk.昆虫为什么会灭绝?蜻蜓目灭绝风险的替代指标:分布范围大小和局部脆弱性特征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Apr 8;287(1924):20192645. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2645. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
6
Urban areas as hotspots for bees and pollination but not a panacea for all insects.城市地区是蜜蜂和授粉的热点,但并非所有昆虫的万灵药。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 29;11(1):576. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14496-6.
7
Insect Declines in the Anthropocene.人类世的昆虫衰落。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2020 Jan 7;65:457-480. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025151. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
Taxonomic and functional diversity of insect herbivore assemblages associated with the canopy-dominant trees of the Azorean native forest.与亚速尔原生林冠层优势树种相关的昆虫食草动物组合的分类和功能多样性。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 15;14(7):e0219493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219493. eCollection 2019.
9
Recognizing the quiet extinction of invertebrates.认识到无脊椎动物的悄然灭绝。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 3;10(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07916-1.
10
Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web.气候驱动的节肢动物丰度下降重塑了热带雨林食物网。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):E10397-E10406. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722477115. Epub 2018 Oct 15.