• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种基于炎症的评分系统以识别适合进行综合基因组分析的患者。

Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling.

作者信息

Hayashi Naomi, Fukada Ippei, Ohmoto Akihiro, Yamazaki Masumi, Wang Xiaofei, Hosonaga Mari, Takahashi Shunji

机构信息

Department of Genomic Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Discov Oncol. 2022 Oct 19;13(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2.

DOI:10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2
PMID:36260237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9582079/
Abstract

Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 263 patients were scored using the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) from 0 to 2 based on the combination of serum albumin and c-reactive protein (CRP): 0, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl and CRP ≤ 0.5 mg/dl; 1, albumin < 3.5 g/dl or CRP > 0.5 mg/dl; and 2, albumin < 3.5 g/dl and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl. Overall survival was compared between mGPS 0-1 and mGPS 2 groups. The prognosis of patients with PS 0-1 and mGPS 2 was also evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) were mGPS 2. Patients with mGPS 2 had significant shorter survival (14.7 months vs 4.6 months, p < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients were PS 0-1 and mGPS 2, and their survival was also short (5.6 months). Evaluation of mGPS is a simple and useful method for identifying patients with adequate prognosis using CGP.

摘要

在进行综合基因组分析(CGP)之前,体能状态(PS)被广泛用作评估患者总体状况的指标。然而,PS评分依赖于每位医生,且没有客观通用的指标来确定适合进行CGP的患者。总体而言,基于血清白蛋白和C反应蛋白(CRP)的组合,使用改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)对263例患者进行了0至2分的评分:0分,白蛋白≥3.5g/dl且CRP≤0.5mg/dl;1分,白蛋白<3.5g/dl或CRP>0.5mg/dl;2分,白蛋白<3.5g/dl且CRP>0.5mg/dl。比较了mGPS 0 - 1组和mGPS 2组的总生存期。还评估了PS 0 - 1和mGPS 2患者的预后。39例患者(14.8%)为mGPS 2。mGPS 2的患者生存期显著缩短(14.7个月对4.6个月,p<0.01)。28例患者为PS 0 - 1且mGPS 2,他们的生存期也较短(5.6个月)。评估mGPS是一种使用CGP识别预后良好患者的简单且有用的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da38/9582079/19be2dcbcf54/12672_2022_574_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da38/9582079/052aebab126a/12672_2022_574_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da38/9582079/19be2dcbcf54/12672_2022_574_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da38/9582079/052aebab126a/12672_2022_574_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da38/9582079/19be2dcbcf54/12672_2022_574_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling.评估一种基于炎症的评分系统以识别适合进行综合基因组分析的患者。
Discov Oncol. 2022 Oct 19;13(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2.
2
Prognostic value of modified Glasgow prognostic score in recurrent high-grade glial tumors treated with systemic treatment.改良格拉斯哥预后评分在系统治疗复发性高级别胶质瘤中的预后价值。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:105976. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105976. Epub 2020 May 30.
3
Sarcopenia and the Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score are Significant Predictors of Survival Among Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Who are Receiving First-Line Sunitinib Treatment.肌肉减少症和改良格拉斯哥预后评分是接受一线舒尼替尼治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者生存的重要预测因素。
Target Oncol. 2016 Oct;11(5):605-617. doi: 10.1007/s11523-016-0430-0.
4
The high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score is superior to the modified Glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic predictor for head and neck cancer.作为头颈癌的预后预测指标,高敏改良格拉斯哥预后评分优于改良格拉斯哥预后评分。
Oncotarget. 2018 Dec 11;9(97):37008-37016. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26438.
5
Comparison of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in evaluating the prognosis of patients with operable and inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)与改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)在评估可手术和不可手术非小细胞肺癌患者预后中的比较
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;142(6):1285-97. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-2113-0. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
6
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score is a novel predictor of clinical outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.改良的格拉斯哥预后评分是射血分数保留心力衰竭临床结局的新型预测指标。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2020 Jun;54(3):174-178. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1709656. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Validation of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) - Analysis of patients enrolled in the GCIG Symptom Benefit Study (SBS).改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)在复发性卵巢癌(ROC)中的验证- GCIG 症状获益研究(SBS)入组患者的分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
8
The modified glasgow prognostic score is an independent prognostic indicator in neoadjuvantly treated adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.改良格拉斯哥预后评分是新辅助治疗的食管胃交界腺癌的独立预后指标。
Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 8;9(6):6968-6976. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24087. eCollection 2018 Jan 23.
9
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score associated with survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.改良 Glasgow 预后评分与免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者生存的相关性。
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Jul;9(7). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002851.
10
Usefulness of an inflammation-based prognostic score (mGPS) for predicting survival in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction.不可切除恶性胆道梗阻患者基于炎症的预后评分(mGPS)预测生存的有用性。
World J Surg. 2013 Sep;37(9):2222-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2075-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in the impact of controlling nutritional status score on diabetic retinopathy: findings of 2003-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.控制营养状况评分对糖尿病视网膜病变影响的性别差异:2003 - 2018年美国国家健康与营养检查调查结果
Front Nutr. 2025 May 16;12:1597521. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1597521. eCollection 2025.
2
Senataxin and R-loops homeostasis: multifaced implications in carcinogenesis.Senataxin与R环稳态:在致癌过程中的多方面影响
Cell Death Discov. 2023 May 5;9(1):145. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01441-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Precision Oncology and the Universal Health Coverage System in Japan.精准肿瘤学与日本的全民健康覆盖体系
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec 11;3. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00291. eCollection 2019.
2
Estimated Cost of Anticancer Therapy Directed by Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in a Single-Center Study.单中心研究中综合基因组分析指导下的抗癌治疗估计成本
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Nov 2;2. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00074. eCollection 2018.
3
Impact and Diagnostic Gaps of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Real-World Clinical Practice.真实世界临床实践中综合基因组分析的影响与诊断差距
Cancers (Basel). 2020 May 4;12(5):1156. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051156.
4
Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: a scoping review.精准医学的成本效益:范围综述。
Int J Public Health. 2019 Dec;64(9):1261-1271. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01298-x. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
5
Oncologist uptake of comprehensive genomic profile guided targeted therapy.肿瘤学家对综合基因组谱指导的靶向治疗的接受情况。
Oncotarget. 2019 Jul 23;10(45):4616-4629. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.27047.
6
Comparing Physician and Nurse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) Ratings as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer.比较医师和护士的东部肿瘤协作组表现状态(ECOG-PS)评分,以预测癌症患者的临床结局。
Oncologist. 2019 Dec;24(12):e1460-e1466. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0882. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
7
Feasibility and utility of a panel testing for 114 cancer-associated genes in a clinical setting: A hospital-based study.在临床环境中检测 114 个癌症相关基因的面板的可行性和实用性:一项基于医院的研究。
Cancer Sci. 2019 Apr;110(4):1480-1490. doi: 10.1111/cas.13969. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
Cost of cancer diagnosis using next-generation sequencing targeted gene panels in routine practice: a nationwide French study.基于新一代测序靶向基因panel 在常规实践中进行癌症诊断的费用:一项全国性的法国研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Mar;26(3):314-323. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0081-3. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Comprehensive genomic profiling in routine clinical practice leads to a low rate of benefit from genotype-directed therapy.在常规临床实践中进行全面基因组分析导致基因型指导治疗的获益率较低。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3587-8.
10
Institutional implementation of clinical tumor profiling on an unselected cancer population.在未选择的癌症人群中进行临床肿瘤分析的机构实施。
JCI Insight. 2016 Nov 17;1(19):e87062. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.87062.