• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度腰椎椎间融合微创技术的现状及手术效果:一项系统评价与Meta分析

The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kumar Ashutosh, Sardhara Jayesh, Mishra Prabhaker, Kapoor Vishwas, Mehrotra Anant, Raiyani Vandan, Singh Mayank, Goyal Nishant, Kulkarni Arvind G, Srikantha Umesh, Bhaisora Kamlesh Singh, Das Kuntal Kanti, Srivastava Arun K, Behari Sanjay

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):245-255. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_4_22. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

DOI:10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_4_22
PMID:36263335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9574105/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The global shift of trends to minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases has become prominent in India for few decades. We aimed to assess the current status of MIS techniques for lumbar interbody fusion and their surgical outcomes in the Indian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review (following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines) was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar till November 2020. The primary (visual analog scale [VAS] and oswestry disability index [ODI] scores; intraoperative blood loss; duration of surgery; duration of hospital stay, and fusion rate) and secondary (wound-associated complications and dural tear/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak) outcomes were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies comprising a total of 1318 patients were included for analysis. The pooled mean of follow-up duration was 26.64 ± 8.43 months (range 5.7-36.5 months). Degenerative spondylolisthesis of Myerding grade I/II was the most common indication, followed by lytic listhesis, herniated prolapsed disc, and lumbar canal stenosis. The calculated pooled standard mean difference (SMD) suggested a significant decrease in postoperative ODI scores (SMD = 5.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.77-7.29; < 0.01) and VAS scores (SMD = 6.50, 95% CI = 4.6-8.4; < 0.01). The pooled mean blood loss, duration of postoperative hospital stay, duration of surgery, and fusion rate were 127.75 ± 52.79 mL, 4.78 ± 3.88 days, 178.59 ± 38.69 min, and 97.53% ± 2.69%, respectively. A total of 334 adverse events were recorded in 1318 patients, giving a complication rate of 25.34%.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is the most common minimally invasive technique employed for lumbar interbody fusion in India, while oblique lumbar interbody fusion is in the initial stages. The surgical and outcome-related factors improved significantly after MIS LIF in the Indian population.

摘要

目的

几十年来,在印度,腰椎退行性疾病的治疗趋势向微创脊柱(MIS)手术的全球转变已变得十分显著。我们旨在评估印度人群中用于腰椎椎间融合的MIS技术的现状及其手术效果。

材料与方法

按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价,截至2020年11月,使用PubMed和谷歌学术进行检索。使用Review Manager 5.4软件分析主要结局(视觉模拟量表[VAS]和奥斯威斯功能障碍指数[ODI]评分;术中失血量;手术时间;住院时间和融合率)和次要结局(伤口相关并发症和硬脊膜撕裂/脑脊液[CSF]漏)。

结果

共纳入15项研究,总计1318例患者进行分析。随访时间的合并平均值为26.64±8.43个月(范围5.7 - 36.5个月)。迈尔丁I/II级退行性脊椎滑脱是最常见的适应证,其次是溶骨性脊椎滑脱、椎间盘突出症和腰椎管狭窄。计算得出的合并标准平均差(SMD)表明术后ODI评分显著降低(SMD = 5.53,95%置信区间[CI] = 3.77 - 7.29;P < 0.01)和VAS评分显著降低(SMD = 6.50,95% CI = 4.6 - 8.4;P < 0.01)。术中平均失血量、术后住院时间、手术时间和融合率分别为127.75±52.79 mL、4.78±3.88天、178.59±38.69分钟和97.53%±2.69%。1318例患者中共记录到334例不良事件,并发症发生率为25.34%。

结论

微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)是印度用于腰椎椎间融合最常用的微创技术,而斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术尚处于起步阶段。在印度人群中,MIS腰椎椎间融合术后手术及与结局相关的因素有显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/767e9f02302b/JCVJS-13-245-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/4e5937a2dcb0/JCVJS-13-245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/6a72628614a9/JCVJS-13-245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/acef4b5416c1/JCVJS-13-245-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/c7e0e1e4aff2/JCVJS-13-245-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/79e334e5ff2b/JCVJS-13-245-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/2b981fefcb87/JCVJS-13-245-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/767e9f02302b/JCVJS-13-245-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/4e5937a2dcb0/JCVJS-13-245-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/6a72628614a9/JCVJS-13-245-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/acef4b5416c1/JCVJS-13-245-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/c7e0e1e4aff2/JCVJS-13-245-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/79e334e5ff2b/JCVJS-13-245-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/2b981fefcb87/JCVJS-13-245-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640d/9574105/767e9f02302b/JCVJS-13-245-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The current status and surgical outcome of the minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusion in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.印度腰椎椎间融合微创技术的现状及手术效果:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):245-255. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_4_22. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
2
Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单节段腰椎滑脱症斜侧方腰椎体间融合术的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2093-2101. doi: 10.1111/os.13151. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
3
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
4
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.微创与开放后路腰椎融合术的围手术期结局及不良事件:荟萃分析与系统评价
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):416-27. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.SPINE14973. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
5
[Comparison of effectiveness between percutaneous coaxial large-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].经皮同轴大通道内镜下腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 15;36(6):681-690. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202202076.
6
Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与腰椎外侧椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病的临床疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jul;41(3):755-770. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0806-8. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
7
[Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].[两种不同技术联合微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症:一项病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 May 25;35(5):409-17. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.05.002.
8
Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.经皮内镜机器人辅助经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PE RA-TLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱:技术说明和两年临床结果。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jan;25(1):E73-E86.
9
Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e352-e368. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.109. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
10
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.经皮双侧双通道内镜技术与传统显微镜下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术的对比研究
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2066-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuro Navigation Versus Conventional Spinal Techniques in Analyzing Nerve Injury and Anatomical Accuracy: A Systematic Review.神经导航与传统脊柱技术在分析神经损伤和解剖学准确性方面的比较:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Sep 5;16(9):e68760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68760. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Pearls and Pitfalls.腰椎椎间融合术:技术、要点与陷阱
Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):730-741. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0485. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
Perioperative Complications of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): 10 Years of Experience With MI-TLIF.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)的围手术期并发症:MI-TLIF十年经验
Global Spine J. 2021 Jun;11(5):733-739. doi: 10.1177/2192568220941460. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
3
An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparing minimally invasive with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar diseases.
一项比较微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病患者临床结局的更新荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17420. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017420.
4
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
5
Neuro-navigation assisted pre-psoas minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (MI-OLIF): New roads and impediments.神经导航辅助前路经腹微创腰椎间融合术(MI-OLIF):新路与阻碍。
Neurol India. 2019 May-Jun;67(3):803-812. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.263262.
6
Open versus minimally invasive TLIF: literature review and meta-analysis.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术的对比:文献回顾和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jul 22;14(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1266-y.
7
Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: Estimating Global Incidence and Worldwide Volume.退行性腰椎疾病:全球发病率及全球病例数估计
Global Spine J. 2018 Dec;8(8):784-794. doi: 10.1177/2192568218770769. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
8
Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Direct Versus Indirect Decompression with Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis.腰椎椎间融合术中直接减压与间接减压的临床及影像学结果:配对比较分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:e898-e909. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Learning Curve and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.学习曲线与微创脊柱手术
World Neurosurg. 2018 Nov;119:472-478. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.094. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Modified Mini-Open and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparative Study.改良迷你开放与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床及影像学结果:一项对比研究
Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):544-550. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.544. Epub 2018 Jun 4.