Passias Peter Gust, Alas Haddy, Kummer Nicholas, Tretiakov Peter, Diebo Bassel G, Lafage Renaud, Ames Christopher P, Line Breton, Klineberg Eric O, Burton Douglas C, Uribe Juan S, Kim Han Jo, Daniels Alan H, Bess Shay, Protopsaltis Themistocles, Mundis Gregory M, Shaffrey Christopher I, Schwab Frank J, Smith Justin S, Lafage Virginie
Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, Brooklyn, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, USA.
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jul-Sep;13(3):271-277. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_66_21. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
Patients with symptomatic cervical deformity (CD) requiring surgical correction often present with hyperkyphosis (HK), although patients with hyperlordotic curves may require surgery as well. Few studies have investigated differences in CD corrective surgery with regard to HK and hyperlordosis (HL).
The objective of the study is to evaluate patterns in treatment for CD patients with baseline (BL) HK and HL and understand how extreme curvature of the spine may influence surgical outcomes.
Operative CD patients with BL and 1-year (1Y) radiographic data were included in the study. Patients were stratified based on BL C2-C7 lordosis (CL) angle: those >1 standard deviation (SD) from the mean (-6.96 ± 21.47°) were hyperlordotic (>14.51°) or hyperkyphotic (<-28.43°) depending on directionality. Patients within 1SD were considered control group.
102 surgical CD patients (61 years, 65% F, 30 kg/m) with BL and 1Y radiographic data were included. 20 patients met definitions for HK and 21 patients met definitions for HL. No differences in demographics or disability were noted. HK had higher estimated blood loss (EBL) with anterior approaches than HL but similar EBL with posterior approach. Operative time did not differ between groups. Control, HL, and HK groups differed in BL TS-CL (36.6° vs. 22.5° vs. 60.7°, < 0.001) and BL-SVA (10.8 vs. 7.0 vs. -47.8 mm, = 0.001). HL patients had less discectomies, less corpectomies, and similar osteotomy rates to HK. HL had 3x revisions of HK and controls (28.6 vs. 10.0 vs. 9.2%, respectively, = 0.046). At 1Y, HL patients had higher cSVA and trended higher SVA and SS than HK. In terms of BL-upper cervical alignment, HK patients had higher McGregor's slope (MGS) (16.1° vs. 3.3°, = 0.002) and C0-C2 Cobb (43.3° vs. 26.9°, < 0.001), however, postoperative differences in MGS and C0-C2 were not significant. HK drivers of deformity were primarily C (90%), whereas HL had primary CT (38.1%), UT (23.8%), and C (14.3%) drivers.
Hyperlodotic patients trended higher revision rates with greater radiographic malalignment at 1-year postoperative, perhaps due to undercorrection compared to kyphotic etiologies.
有症状的颈椎畸形(CD)患者需要手术矫正,常伴有后凸畸形(HK),尽管颈椎前凸曲线的患者也可能需要手术。很少有研究调查HK和颈椎前凸(HL)在CD矫正手术方面的差异。
本研究的目的是评估基线(BL)为HK和HL的CD患者的治疗模式,并了解脊柱的极端弯曲如何影响手术结果。
本研究纳入了有BL和1年(1Y)影像学数据的手术CD患者。根据BL C2-C7前凸(CL)角对患者进行分层:与平均值(-6.96±21.47°)相差>1个标准差(SD)的患者,根据方向不同,为颈椎前凸(>14.51°)或后凸(<-28.43°)。1SD范围内的患者被视为对照组。
纳入了102例有BL和1Y影像学数据的手术CD患者(61岁,65%为女性,体重指数30kg/m²)。20例患者符合HK定义,21例患者符合HL定义。在人口统计学或残疾方面未发现差异。HK患者前路手术的估计失血量(EBL)高于HL,但后路手术的EBL相似。两组手术时间无差异。对照组、HL组和HK组在BL TS-CL(36.6°对22.5°对60.7°,P<0.001)和BL-SVA(10.8对7.0对-47.8mm,P=0.001)方面存在差异。HL患者的椎间盘切除术、椎体次全切除术较少,截骨率与HK相似。HL的翻修率是HK和对照组的3倍(分别为28.6%对10.0%对9.2%,P=0.046)。在1Y时,HL患者的cSVA较高,SVA和SS有升高趋势,高于HK。就BL上颈椎对线而言,HK患者的麦格雷戈斜率(MGS)较高(16.1°对3.3°,P=0.002)和C0-C2 Cobb角较高(43.3°对