Pichler Werner J, Brüggen Marie-Charlotte
ADR-AC GmbH, Bern, Switzerland.
Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Allergy. 2023 Jan;78(1):60-70. doi: 10.1111/all.15558. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
Virus infections and T-cell-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) can influence each other. In most instances, systemic virus infections appear first. They may prime the reactivity to drugs in two ways: First, by virus-induced second signals: certain drugs like β-lactam antibiotics are haptens and covalently bind to various soluble and tissue proteins, thereby forming novel antigens. Under homeostatic conditions, these neo-antigens do not induce an immune reaction, probably because co-stimulation is missing. During a virus infection, the hapten-modified peptides are presented in an immune-stimulatory environment with co-stimulation. A drug-specific immune reaction may develop and manifest as exanthema. Second, by increased pharmacological interactions with immune receptors (p-i): drugs tend to bind to proteins and may even bind to immune receptors. Without viral infections, this low affine binding may be insufficient to elicit T-cell activation. During a viral infection, immune receptors are more abundantly expressed and allow more interactions to occur. This increases the overall avidity of p-i reactions and may even be sufficient for T-cell activation and symptoms. There is a situation where the virus-DHR sequence of events is inversed: in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), a severe DHR can precede reactivation and viremia of various herpes viruses. One could explain this phenomenon by the massive p-i mediated immune stimulation during acute DRESS, which coincidentally activates many herpes virus-specific T cells. Through p-i stimulation, they develop a cytotoxic activity by killing herpes peptide-expressing cells and releasing herpes viruses. These concepts could explain the often transient nature of DHR occurring during viral infections and the often asymptomatic herpes-virus viraemia after DRESS.
病毒感染与T细胞介导的药物超敏反应(DHR)可相互影响。在大多数情况下,全身性病毒感染首先出现。它们可能通过两种方式引发对药物的反应性:第一,通过病毒诱导的第二信号:某些药物如β-内酰胺抗生素是半抗原,可与各种可溶性和组织蛋白共价结合,从而形成新的抗原。在稳态条件下,这些新抗原不会诱导免疫反应,可能是因为缺乏共刺激。在病毒感染期间,半抗原修饰的肽在具有共刺激的免疫刺激环境中呈递。可能会发生药物特异性免疫反应并表现为皮疹。第二,通过与免疫受体增加的药理相互作用(p-i):药物倾向于与蛋白质结合,甚至可能与免疫受体结合。没有病毒感染时,这种低亲和力结合可能不足以引发T细胞活化。在病毒感染期间,免疫受体表达更丰富,允许更多的相互作用发生。这增加了p-i反应的总体亲和力,甚至可能足以导致T细胞活化和出现症状。有一种情况是病毒-DHR事件顺序相反:在伴有嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状的药物反应(DRESS)中,严重的DHR可能先于各种疱疹病毒的再激活和病毒血症出现。可以通过急性DRESS期间大量的p-i介导的免疫刺激来解释这一现象,这恰好激活了许多疱疹病毒特异性T细胞。通过p-i刺激,它们通过杀死表达疱疹肽的细胞并释放疱疹病毒而产生细胞毒性活性。这些概念可以解释病毒感染期间DHR通常具有的短暂性质以及DRESS后经常无症状的疱疹病毒血症。