• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收入不平等、碳排放与绿色发展效率。

Income inequality, carbon emissions, and green development efficiency.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Guangzhou Nanyang Polytechnic College, Guangzhou, 510900, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):21081-21091. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23583-8. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-23583-8
PMID:36264465
Abstract

Income inequality affects not only social well-being, health, and carbon emissions but also the strategy for green development in China. Based on the panel data of 205 cities in China from 2010 to 2020, a panel model with partial linear functional coefficient is used to analyze and test the relationship between income inequality, carbon emissions, and green development efficiency under different regional economic development levels. The empirical results show that the impact of income inequality on carbon emissions and green development efficiency is significant. The worsening of income inequality could aggravate carbon emissions, but the effect of income inequality on carbon emissions shows an increase-decrease-flattening with the continuous improvement of regional economic development. In terms of affecting the green development efficiency, the effect of income inequality on the efficiency of green development presents an inverted U shape. However, the number of cities where income inequality has an inhibitory effect on carbon emissions and green development efficiency has increased over time, and the impact of income inequality in a few cities on green development efficiency is not significant. These findings provide new insights into the understanding of shared prosperity and the strategy of carbon peaking and carbon neutralization in China.

摘要

收入不平等不仅影响社会福祉、健康和碳排放,也影响中国的绿色发展战略。本文利用 2010-2020 年中国 205 个城市的面板数据,采用具有部分线性函数系数的面板模型,分析和检验了不同区域经济发展水平下收入不平等、碳排放和绿色发展效率之间的关系。实证结果表明,收入不平等对碳排放和绿色发展效率的影响显著。收入不平等的加剧会加剧碳排放,但随着区域经济发展水平的不断提高,收入不平等对碳排放的影响呈增加-减少-平坦的趋势。就影响绿色发展效率而言,收入不平等对绿色发展效率的影响呈倒 U 型。然而,随着时间的推移,收入不平等对碳排放和绿色发展效率具有抑制作用的城市数量有所增加,而且在一些城市,收入不平等对绿色发展效率的影响并不显著。这些发现为理解中国的共同繁荣和碳峰值及碳中和战略提供了新的视角。

相似文献

1
Income inequality, carbon emissions, and green development efficiency.收入不平等、碳排放与绿色发展效率。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):21081-21091. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23583-8. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
2
Uncovering the impact of income inequality and population aging on carbon emission efficiency: An empirical analysis of 139 countries.揭示收入不平等和人口老龄化对碳排放效率的影响:对 139 个国家的实证分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 20;857(Pt 2):159508. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159508. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
How does income and green technology innovation influence the emissions reduction effect of renewable energy: evidence from Chinese provincial data.收入和绿色技术创新如何影响可再生能源的减排效果:来自中国省级数据的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(29):74056-74069. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27677-9. Epub 2023 May 18.
4
Will income inequality influence the abatement effect of renewable energy technological innovation on carbon dioxide emissions?收入不平等是否会影响可再生能源技术创新对二氧化碳排放的减排效果?
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110482. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110482. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
5
Shared prosperity, energy-saving, and emission-reduction: Can ICT capital achieve a "win-win-win" situation?共同繁荣、节能和减排:信息通信技术资本能否实现“三赢”局面?
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115710. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115710. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Effect of economic development, income inequality, transportation, and environmental expenditures on transport emissions: evidence from OECD countries.经济发展、收入不平等、交通和环境支出对交通排放的影响:来自经合组织国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(37):56642-56657. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19580-6. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
7
Has the Digital Economy Reduced Carbon Emissions?: Analysis Based on Panel Data of 278 Cities in China.数字经济是否减少了碳排放?——基于中国 278 个城市面板数据的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;19(18):11814. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811814.
8
Impact of income inequality on carbon emissions: a matter of corruption governance.收入不平等对碳排放的影响:腐败治理的问题。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(4):5173-5189. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31190-4. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
9
The heterogeneous effects of urbanization and income inequality on CO emissions in BRICS economies: evidence from panel quantile regression.城市化和收入不平等对金砖国家 CO 排放的非均匀影响:基于面板分位数回归的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(17):17176-17193. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1900-y. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
The revised approaches to income inequality impact on production-based and consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions: literature review.修正的收入不平等对基于生产和基于消费的二氧化碳排放的影响方法:文献综述。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(9):8980-8990. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08005-x. Epub 2020 Feb 10.