• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收入不平等是否会影响可再生能源技术创新对二氧化碳排放的减排效果?

Will income inequality influence the abatement effect of renewable energy technological innovation on carbon dioxide emissions?

机构信息

The Center for Economic Research, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250100, PR China.

School of Public Economics and Administration, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433, PR China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110482. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110482. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110482
PMID:32250907
Abstract

Environmental pollution and income inequality have become two salient issues in China. To achieve a green economic transformation, China urgently needs to develop renewable energy technologies to reduce carbon dioxide (CO) emissions. However, the relationship among income inequality, renewable energy technological innovation (RETI) and CO emissions has not received sufficient attention in the current literature. Based on Chinese provincial panel data from 2000 to 2015, this paper adopts a panel fixed effect regression model and a panel threshold model to perform an analysis on the nonlinear relationship among these factors. The results show that (1) RETI is conducive to reducing per capita CO emissions (PCE). However, with an increase in income inequality, the abatement effect of RETI on per capita CO emissions will be hindered, and RETI will even positively contribute to PCE. (2) The panel threshold model shows that the impact of RETI on PCE has a significant single-threshold effect with regard to income inequality. When income inequality is lower than the threshold value, the impact of RETI on PCE is not significant. However, above the threshold value, that is, within the interval of higher income inequality, an increase in RETI will positively contribute to PCE. Finally, from the perspectives of income inequality and RETI, relevant policy implications are put forward for achieving the transformation of a low-carbon economy.

摘要

环境污染和收入不平等已成为中国的两个突出问题。为实现绿色经济转型,中国迫切需要发展可再生能源技术以减少二氧化碳(CO)排放。然而,在当前文献中,收入不平等、可再生能源技术创新(RETI)和 CO 排放之间的关系尚未得到足够重视。本文基于中国 2000-2015 年的省级面板数据,采用面板固定效应回归模型和面板门限模型,对这些因素之间的非线性关系进行了分析。结果表明:(1)RETI 有利于降低人均 CO 排放(PCE)。然而,随着收入不平等的加剧,RETI 对人均 CO 排放的减排效应将受到阻碍,甚至会对 PCE 产生正向贡献。(2)面板门限模型表明,RETI 对 PCE 的影响在收入不平等方面存在显著的单一门限效应。当收入不平等低于阈值时,RETI 对 PCE 的影响不显著。然而,超过阈值后,即在更高收入不平等的区间内,RETI 的增加将对 PCE 产生正向贡献。最后,从收入不平等和 RETI 的角度出发,提出了实现低碳经济转型的相关政策建议。

相似文献

1
Will income inequality influence the abatement effect of renewable energy technological innovation on carbon dioxide emissions?收入不平等是否会影响可再生能源技术创新对二氧化碳排放的减排效果?
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110482. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110482. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
2
Renewable energy technological innovation, market forces, and carbon emission efficiency.可再生能源技术创新、市场力量与碳排放效率。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 20;796:148908. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148908. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
3
The role of renewable energy technological innovation on climate change: Empirical evidence from China.可再生能源技术创新对气候变化的作用:来自中国的实证证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 1;659:1505-1512. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.449. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
Income Inequality, Economic Complexity, and Renewable Energy Impacts in Controlling Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions.收入不平等、经济复杂性与可再生能源对控制基于消费的碳排放的影响。
Eval Rev. 2024 Feb;48(1):119-142. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231173766. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
How does income and green technology innovation influence the emissions reduction effect of renewable energy: evidence from Chinese provincial data.收入和绿色技术创新如何影响可再生能源的减排效果:来自中国省级数据的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(29):74056-74069. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27677-9. Epub 2023 May 18.
6
Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO emissions constraint.在中国碳排放约束下的可再生能源技术创新的决定因素。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 1;247:662-671. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.121. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
7
How does renewable energy technology innovation affect manufacturing carbon intensity in China?可再生能源技术创新如何影响中国制造业的碳强度?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(39):59784-59801. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20012-8. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Do drivers of renewable energy consumption matter for BRICS economies? Nexus among technological innovation, environmental degradation, economic growth, and income inequality.可再生能源消费的驱动因素对金砖国家经济体重要吗?技术创新、环境恶化、经济增长和收入不平等之间的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(5):11321-11331. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24665-3. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
9
Technological innovation and renewable energy consumption: a middle path for trading off financial risk and carbon emissions.技术创新与可再生能源消费:权衡金融风险与碳排放的中间道路。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(22):33046-33062. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17915-3. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
10
Renewable energy technology innovation and inclusive low-carbon development from the perspective of spatiotemporal consistency.从时空一致性的角度看可再生能源技术创新与包容性低碳发展。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(8):20490-20513. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23556-x. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on the effect of technological innovation on carbon emission intensity in 278 prefecture-level cities in China.中国278个地级市技术创新对碳排放强度的影响研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99370-5.
2
Spatio-temporal dynamics and influencing factors of carbon emissions (1997-2019) at county level in mainland China b.中国大陆县级层面碳排放的时空动态变化及影响因素(1997 - 2019年)b
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 30;10(18):e37245. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37245. eCollection 2024 Sep 30.
3
Exploring the impact of financial globalization, good governance and renewable energy consumption on environmental pollution: Evidence from BRICS-T countries.
探讨金融全球化、良好治理与可再生能源消费对环境污染的影响:来自金砖五国加其他国家的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 21;10(13):e33398. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33398. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
4
The impact of technological innovations on the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from EU-27.技术创新对环境库兹涅茨曲线的影响:来自欧盟27国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(13):19886-19903. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32303-3. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
5
The effect of producer service agglomeration externalities on urban green innovation efficiency in China.生产者服务集聚外部性对中国城市绿色创新效率的影响
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 20;10(3):e25085. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25085. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
6
Carbon emission reduction effects of renewable energy technological innovation in China: New insights into the intellectual property rights protection.中国可再生能源技术创新的碳排放减少效应:知识产权保护新见解
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 9;9(9):e19836. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19836. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Can green technology reduce carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS countries.绿色技术能减少二氧化碳排放吗?来自七国集团和金砖国家的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 25;9(5):e15683. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15683. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Does income inequality reshape the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis? A nonlinear panel data analysis.收入不平等是否重塑了环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)假说?基于非线性面板数据的分析。
Environ Res. 2023 Jan 1;216(Pt 2):114575. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114575. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Green technology innovation and carbon emissions nexus in China: Does industrial structure upgrading matter?中国绿色技术创新与碳排放的关系:产业结构升级重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:951172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951172. eCollection 2022.
10
The Impact of Green Technology Innovation on Carbon Emissions in the Context of Carbon Neutrality in China: Evidence from Spatial Spillover and Nonlinear Effect Analysis.中国碳中和背景下绿色技术创新对碳排放的影响:基于空间溢出和非线性效应的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 10;19(2):730. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020730.