UCSD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
UCSD Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute- Biostatistics, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276326. eCollection 2022.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Exercise-based rehabilitation is a conservative management approach for individuals with low back pain. However, adherence rates for conservative management are often low and the reasons for this are not well described. The objective of this study was to evaluate predictors of adherence and patient-reported reasons for non-adherence after ceasing a supervised exercise-based rehabilitation program in individuals with low back pain.
Retrospective observational study.
Data was retrospectively analyzed from 5 rehabilitation clinics utilizing a standardized exercise-based rehabilitation program. Baseline demographics, diagnosis and symptom specific features, visit number, and discontinuation profiles were quantified for 2,243 patients who underwent the program.
Forty-three percent (43%) of participants were adherent to the program, with the majority (31.7%) discontinuing treatment prior to completion due to logistic and accessibility issues. Another 13.2% discontinued prior to the prescribed duration due to clinically significant improvements in pain and/or disability without formal discharge evaluation, whereas 8.3% did not continue due to lack of improvement. Finally, 6.0% were discharged for related and unrelated medical reasons including surgery. Individuals diagnosed with disc pathology were most likely to be adherent to the program.
This study was a retrospective chart review with missing data for some variables. Future studies with a prospective design would increase quality of evidence.
The majority of individuals prescribed an in-clinic exercise-based rehabilitation program are non-adherent. Patient diagnosis was the most important predictor of adherence. For those who were not adherent, important barriers include personal issues, insufficient insurance authorization and lack of geographic accessibility.
背景/目的:基于运动的康复是治疗腰痛患者的保守管理方法。然而,保守管理的依从率往往较低,其原因尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估腰痛患者停止监督性基于运动的康复计划后,依从性的预测因素和患者报告的不依从原因。
回顾性观察性研究。
利用标准化基于运动的康复计划,对 5 家康复诊所的数据进行回顾性分析。对 2243 名接受该计划的患者进行了基线人口统计学、诊断和症状特异性特征、就诊次数和终止情况的量化分析。
43%的参与者依从了该计划,其中大多数(31.7%)由于物流和可及性问题在完成前停止治疗。另有 13.2%因疼痛和/或残疾的临床显著改善而在规定的治疗时间前未经正式出院评估就停止治疗,而 8.3%因无改善而停止治疗。最后,6.0%因相关和无关的医疗原因(包括手术)出院。被诊断为椎间盘病变的患者最有可能坚持该计划。
本研究是一项回顾性图表回顾,一些变量存在数据缺失。未来采用前瞻性设计的研究将提高证据质量。
大多数被处方门诊基于运动的康复计划的患者不依从。患者的诊断是依从性的最重要预测因素。对于那些不依从的人来说,重要的障碍包括个人问题、保险授权不足和地理可及性差。