Suppr超能文献

比较托珠单抗和依那西普对类风湿关节炎治疗中关节侵蚀进展的抑制作用。

Comparison of the inhibitory effect of tocilizumab and etanercept on the progression of joint erosion in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Matsubara Mayflower Hospital, Kato, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 20;12(1):17524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22152-w.

Abstract

We compared the efficacy of tocilizumab and etanercept in inhibiting radiographic progression of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Overall, 187 patients treated with etanercept or tocilizumab were selected. To adjust for baseline patient characteristics between the tocilizumab and etanercept treatment groups, a propensity score matching was performed. Radiographic progression of joint destruction was compared between patients treated with tocilizumab or etanercept. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and modified health assessment questionnaire (mHAQ) scores at the administration of biologic treatment and after 12 months of tocilizumab and etanercept therapy were measured and compared to radiographical parameters between the groups. Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), CDAI, and mHAQ scores improved after 12 months of treatment in the two groups. Proportion of patients with no Sharp erosion score progression was significantly higher with tocilizumab treatment than with etanercept treatment (p = 0.032). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Sharp erosion score was significantly associated with baseline CDAI (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.099, p = 0.037). Tocilizumab treatment suppressed joint erosion progression compared to etanercept, and the progression correlated with baseline CDAI.

摘要

我们比较了托珠单抗和依那西普抑制类风湿关节炎关节破坏放射学进展的疗效。共选择了 187 例接受依那西普或托珠单抗治疗的患者。为了调整托珠单抗和依那西普治疗组之间的基线患者特征,进行了倾向评分匹配。比较了接受托珠单抗或依那西普治疗的患者的关节破坏放射学进展情况。测量并比较了两组患者在接受生物治疗时和接受托珠单抗和依那西普治疗 12 个月后的临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)和改良健康评估问卷(mHAQ)评分与放射学参数之间的差异。两组患者在治疗 12 个月后 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、基质金属蛋白酶-3(MMP-3)、CDAI 和 mHAQ 评分均有所改善。与依那西普治疗相比,托珠单抗治疗的患者无 Sharp 侵蚀评分进展的比例显著更高(p=0.032)。多变量分析表明,Sharp 侵蚀评分与基线 CDAI 显著相关(优势比,1.05;95%置信区间,1.003-1.099,p=0.037)。托珠单抗治疗抑制了关节侵蚀的进展,与基线 CDAI 相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3e0/9585052/e826db763642/41598_2022_22152_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验