Suppr超能文献

阿巴西普、托珠单抗和依那西普在对抗TNF单克隆抗体反应不足的日本类风湿性关节炎患者中的临床疗效。

Clinical efficacy of abatacept, tocilizumab, and etanercept in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies.

作者信息

Hirabara Shinya, Takahashi Nobunori, Fukaya Naoki, Miyake Hiroyuki, Yabe Yuichiro, Kaneko Atsushi, Ito Takayasu, Oguchi Takeshi, Kida Daihei, Hirano Yuji, Fujibayashi Takayoshi, Sugiura Fumiaki, Hayashi Masatoshi, Funahashi Koji, Hanabayashi Masahiro, Asai Shuji, Ishiguro Naoki, Kojima Toshihisa

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rheumatology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsuruma-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Sep;33(9):1247-54. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2711-2. Epub 2014 Jun 28.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and retention rates of three biologics (abatacept, tocilizumab, and etanercept) after switching from first-course anti-TNF monoclonal antibody therapy. We performed a retrospective multicenter study of 89 patients who underwent second-course biologic therapy for 52 weeks after switching from first-course anti-TNF monoclonal antibody therapy. Patients at baseline had a mean age of 58.7 years, mean disease duration of 9.8 years, and mean clinical disease activity index (CDAI) of 22.4. There was no significant difference between the three drugs, except in rheumatoid factor positivity. Retention rates for abatacept, tocilizumab, and etanercept treatment at 52 weeks were 72.0, 89.5 and 84.6 %, respectively. The evaluation of CDAI indicated no significant difference at 52 weeks among the three drugs. Discontinuation due to all unfavorable causes did not significantly differ among the three drugs in hazard ratio-based evaluations. Our results show that patients treated with abatacept, tocilizumab, and etanercept achieved a high response rate with no significant differences in drug retention rates and clinical efficacy. These drugs represent good therapeutic options for patients with RA who are refractory to anti-TNF monoclonal antibody therapy.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较三种生物制剂(阿巴西普、托珠单抗和依那西普)在从一线抗TNF单克隆抗体治疗转换后的疗效和保留率。我们对89例从一线抗TNF单克隆抗体治疗转换后接受二线生物治疗52周的患者进行了一项回顾性多中心研究。基线时患者的平均年龄为58.7岁,平均病程为9.8年,平均临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)为22.4。除类风湿因子阳性外,三种药物之间无显著差异。阿巴西普、托珠单抗和依那西普治疗52周时的保留率分别为72.0%、89.5%和84.6%。CDAI评估表明,三种药物在52周时无显著差异。在基于风险比的评估中,三种药物因所有不利原因导致的停药情况无显著差异。我们的结果表明,接受阿巴西普、托珠单抗和依那西普治疗的患者实现了高缓解率,药物保留率和临床疗效无显著差异。这些药物是对抗TNF单克隆抗体治疗难治的类风湿关节炎患者的良好治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c324/4138439/d89fb0a4204f/10067_2014_2711_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验