Department of Anaesthesia, Ostfold Hospital Trust, Moss, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Feb;67(2):221-229. doi: 10.1111/aas.14160. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
BACKGROUND: Both the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and the anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) have been shown effective in reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Our hypothesis was that there is no difference in analgesic effect between the two blocks for this procedure. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled study, 60 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were equally randomly assigned to either a preoperative TAP block or an anterior QLB. The primary outcome was oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption at 4 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were OME consumption at 24, 48 h and 7 days, pain scores at rest and when coughing, nausea, and level of sedation measured at 1, 2, 3, 24, and 48 h and 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in OME consumption at 4 h postoperatively, TAP group (10.3 ± 7.85 mg) (mean ± SD) versus the anterior QLB group (10.9 ± 10.85 mg) (p = .713). The pain scores were similar at rest and when coughing during the 7 day observation period, as were the level of sedation and incidence of nausea. There were no cases of serious side-effects or muscle weakness of the thigh on the same side as the block. CONCLUSION: There is no difference in OME consumption, pain, nausea or sedation between the TAP and the anterior QLB. Thus, the choice between the two blocks in a clinical setting of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair should be based on other aspects, such as skills, practicalities, and potential risks.
背景:腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞和前锯肌平面(QLB)阻滞均已被证明可有效减轻腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的疼痛。我们的假设是,这两种阻滞方法在该手术中的镇痛效果没有差异。
方法:在这项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究中,60 名接受腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的成年患者被平均随机分为 TAP 阻滞组或前锯肌阻滞组。主要结局是术后 4 小时的口服吗啡等效物(OME)消耗量。次要结局是术后 24、48 小时和 7 天的 OME 消耗量、静息和咳嗽时的疼痛评分、术后 1、2、3、24 和 48 小时及 7 天的恶心和镇静程度。
结果:53 名患者完成了研究。术后 4 小时 OME 消耗量无显著差异,TAP 组(10.3 ± 7.85mg)(均值 ± 标准差)与前锯肌阻滞组(10.9 ± 10.85mg)(p = 0.713)。在 7 天的观察期内,静息和咳嗽时的疼痛评分相似,镇静程度和恶心发生率也相似。阻滞同侧无严重副作用或大腿肌无力病例。
结论:TAP 和前锯肌阻滞在 OME 消耗、疼痛、恶心或镇静方面无差异。因此,在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的临床环境中,两种阻滞方法的选择应基于其他方面,如技能、实用性和潜在风险。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023-2
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024-6-4
BJA Educ. 2018-10
Anesthesiology. 2019-11