• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更新后的临床实践指南对感染门诊治疗及相关临床结局的影响

Impact of Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Outpatient Treatment for Infection and Associated Clinical Outcomes.

作者信息

Dubberke Erik R, Puckett Justin T, Obi Engels N, Kamal-Bahl Sachin, Desai Kaushal, Stuart Bruce, Doshi Jalpa A

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

COVIA Health Solutions, Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 2;9(10):ofac435. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac435. eCollection 2022 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofac435
PMID:36267250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9578155/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) infection (CDI) guideline update recommended treatment with fidaxomicin or vancomycin for CDI. We aimed to examine outpatient CDI treatment utilization before and after the guideline update and compare clinical outcomes associated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin use.

METHODS

A pre-post study design was employed using Medicare data. CDI treatment utilization and clinical outcomes (4- and 8-week sustained response, CDI recurrence) were compared between patients indexed from April-September 2017 (preguideline period) and those indexed from April-September 2018 (postguideline period). Clinical outcomes associated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin were compared using propensity score-matched analyses.

RESULTS

From the pre- to postguideline period, metronidazole use decreased (initial CDI: 81.2% to 53.5%; recurrent CDI: 49.7% to 27.6%) while vancomycin (initial CDI: 17.9% to 44.9%; recurrent CDI: 48.1% to 66.4%) and fidaxomicin (initial CDI: 0.87% to 1.63%; recurrent CDI: 2.2% to 6.0%) use increased significantly ( < .001 for all). However, clinical outcomes did not improve. In propensity score-matched analyses, fidaxomicin versus vancomycin users had 4-week sustained response rates that were higher by 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0%-22.9%; = .0058) and 30.0% (95% CI, 16.8%-44.3%; = .0002) in initial and recurrent CDI cohorts, respectively. Recurrence rates were numerically lower for fidaxomicin in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin use increased and metronidazole use decreased after the 2017 guideline update. Fidaxomicin use increased but remained low. Improved outcomes associated with fidaxomicin relative to vancomycin suggest benefits from its greater use in Medicare patients.

摘要

背景

2017年美国传染病学会/美国医疗保健流行病学学会(IDSA/SHEA)艰难梭菌感染(CDI)指南更新推荐使用非达霉素或万古霉素治疗CDI。我们旨在研究指南更新前后门诊CDI治疗的使用情况,并比较非达霉素与万古霉素使用相关的临床结局。

方法

采用前后对照研究设计,使用医疗保险数据。比较2017年4月至9月(指南发布前时期)索引的患者与2018年4月至9月(指南发布后时期)索引的患者的CDI治疗使用情况和临床结局(4周和8周持续缓解、CDI复发)。使用倾向评分匹配分析比较非达霉素与万古霉素相关的临床结局。

结果

从指南发布前到发布后时期,甲硝唑的使用减少(初始CDI:81.2%降至53.5%;复发性CDI:49.7%降至27.6%),而万古霉素(初始CDI:17.9%升至44.9%;复发性CDI:48.1%升至66.4%)和非达霉素(初始CDI:0.87%升至1.63%;复发性CDI:2.2%升至6.0%)的使用显著增加(所有P均<0.001)。然而,临床结局并未改善。在倾向评分匹配分析中,非达霉素使用者与万古霉素使用者相比,初始CDI队列和复发性CDI队列的4周持续缓解率分别高出13.5%(95%置信区间[CI],4.0%-22.9%;P = 0.0058)和30.0%(95%CI,16.8%-44.3%;P = 0.0002)。两个队列中,非达霉素的复发率在数值上均较低。

结论

2017年指南更新后,万古霉素的使用增加,甲硝唑的使用减少。非达霉素的使用增加但仍较低。相对于万古霉素,非达霉素相关结局的改善表明在医疗保险患者中更多使用非达霉素有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/9578155/f2dae07138c4/ofac435f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/9578155/f6c09f57d3df/ofac435f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/9578155/f2dae07138c4/ofac435f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/9578155/f6c09f57d3df/ofac435f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/9578155/f2dae07138c4/ofac435f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Outpatient Treatment for Infection and Associated Clinical Outcomes.更新后的临床实践指南对感染门诊治疗及相关临床结局的影响
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 2;9(10):ofac435. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac435. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Infection.对遵循美国感染病学会(IDSA)2021年临床指南更新中感染相关内容的指南依从性和治疗结果的回顾性评估:感染
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 30;11(10):ofae524. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae524. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Real-World Budget Impact of Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin or Metronidazole for In-Hospital Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection.非达霉素与万古霉素或甲硝唑用于艰难梭菌感染住院治疗的真实世界预算影响
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;12(1):106. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12010106.
4
The effect of antibiotic therapy for Clostridioides difficile infection on mortality and other patient-relevant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗生素治疗艰难梭菌感染对死亡率和其他与患者相关结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Jan;30(1):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.09.002. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
5
Outcomes associated with recent guideline recommendations removing metronidazole for treatment of non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a retrospective, observational, nationwide cohort study.与最近的指南建议去除甲硝唑治疗非严重艰难梭菌感染相关的结果:一项回顾性、观察性、全国性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Mar;57(3):106282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106282. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
6
Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection - An observational cohort study. fidaxomicin 与甲硝唑、万古霉素及其联合治疗首发、首次复发和严重艰难梭菌感染的疗效比较:一项观察性队列研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults.欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会:成人艰难梭菌感染治疗指南的 2021 年更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27 Suppl 2:S1-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Fidaxomicin vs Vancomycin for the Treatment of a First Episode of Clostridium Difficile Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.非达霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染初发 episode:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Cureus. 2018 Jun 11;10(6):e2778. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2778.
9
Path of least recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridioides difficile infection.最小复发路径: fidaxomicin 与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Nov;42(11):810-827. doi: 10.1002/phar.2734. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
10
Impact of Revised Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infections in the United States.修订版美国传染病学会和美国医疗保健流行病学学会临床实践指南对美国艰难梭菌感染治疗的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):1944-1949. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa484.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Infection.对遵循美国感染病学会(IDSA)2021年临床指南更新中感染相关内容的指南依从性和治疗结果的回顾性评估:感染
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 30;11(10):ofae524. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae524. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Microbiome profile and calprotectin levels as markers of risk of recurrent infection.微生物组特征和钙卫蛋白水平作为复发性感染风险的标志物。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Sep 13;13:1237500. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1237500. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA): 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults.美国传染病学会 (IDSA) 和美国医疗保健流行病学学会 (SHEA) 的临床实践指南:2021 年关于成人艰难梭菌感染管理的重点更新指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1029-e1044. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab549.
2
Effectiveness of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin in the treatment of recurrent clostridioides difficile.非达霉素与口服万古霉素治疗复发性艰难梭菌感染的疗效比较
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Aug;46(4):993-998. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13387. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Outcomes associated with recent guideline recommendations removing metronidazole for treatment of non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a retrospective, observational, nationwide cohort study.
与最近的指南建议去除甲硝唑治疗非严重艰难梭菌感染相关的结果:一项回顾性、观察性、全国性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Mar;57(3):106282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106282. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
4
Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection - An observational cohort study. fidaxomicin 与甲硝唑、万古霉素及其联合治疗首发、首次复发和严重艰难梭菌感染的疗效比较:一项观察性队列研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
5
Impact of Revised Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infections in the United States.修订版美国传染病学会和美国医疗保健流行病学学会临床实践指南对美国艰难梭菌感染治疗的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):1944-1949. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa484.
6
Trends in U.S. Burden of Infection and Outcomes.美国感染负担和结局的趋势。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1320-1330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910215.
7
Current management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in adults: a summary of recommendations from the 2017 IDSA/SHEA clinical practice guideline.成人艰难梭菌(梭状芽孢杆菌)感染的当前管理:2017IDSA/SHEA 临床实践指南推荐的摘要。
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2019 Mar 29;129(3):189-198. doi: 10.20452/pamw.4377. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
8
Retrospective evaluation of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for treatment of Clostridium difficile infections in allogeneic stem cell transplant.对非达霉素与口服万古霉素治疗异基因干细胞移植中艰难梭菌感染的回顾性评估
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2018 Dec;11(4):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南:成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染:美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(SHEA) 2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
10
Attributable Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs for Patients With Primary and Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in the United States.美国原发性和复发性艰难梭菌感染患者的医疗资源利用和成本归因分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 17;66(9):1326-1332. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1021.