• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和新西兰人工关节感染观察性(PIANO)队列研究中培养阴性人工关节感染的特征与结局

Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections from the Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) cohort study.

作者信息

Browning Sarah, Manning Laurens, Metcalf Sarah, Paterson David L, Robinson James O, Clark Benjamin, Davis Joshua S

机构信息

Infection Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 Sep 20;7(5):203-211. doi: 10.5194/jbji-7-203-2022. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.5194/jbji-7-203-2022
PMID:36267263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9562689/
Abstract

: Culture-negative (CN) prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) account for approximately 10 % of all PJIs and present significant challenges for clinicians. We aimed to explore the significance of CN PJIs within a large prospective cohort study, comparing their characteristics and outcomes with culture-positive (CP) cases. : The Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) study is a prospective, multicentre observational cohort study that was conducted at 27 hospitals between 2014 and 2017. We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes of all patients with CN PJI from the PIANO cohort with those of CP cases. We report on PJI diagnostic criteria in the CN cohort and apply internationally recognized PJI diagnostic guidelines to determine optimal CN PJI detection methods. : Of the 650 patients with 24-month outcome data available, 55 (8.5 %) were CN and 595 were CP. Compared with the CP cohort, CN patients were more likely to be female (32 (58.2 %) vs. 245 (41.2 %);    0.016), involve the shoulder joint (5 (9.1 %) vs. 16 (2.7 %);    0.026), and have a lower mean C-reactive protein (142 mg L vs. 187 mg L ;    0.016). Overall, outcomes were superior in CN patients, with culture negativity an independent predictor of treatment success at 24 months (adjusted odds ratio, aOR, of 3.78 and 95 %CI of 1.65-8.67). Suboptimal diagnostic sampling was common in both cohorts, with CN PJI case detection enhanced using the Infectious Diseases Society of America PJI diagnostic guidelines. : Current PJI diagnostic guidelines vary substantially in their ability to detect CN PJI, with comprehensive diagnostic sampling necessary to achieve diagnostic certainty. Definitive surgical management strategies should be determined by careful assessment of infection type, rather than by culture status alone.

摘要

培养阴性(CN)人工关节感染(PJI)约占所有PJI的10%,给临床医生带来了重大挑战。我们旨在通过一项大型前瞻性队列研究探讨CN PJI的意义,将其特征和结果与培养阳性(CP)病例进行比较。:澳大利亚和新西兰人工关节感染观察性(PIANO)研究是一项前瞻性、多中心观察性队列研究,于2014年至2017年在27家医院进行。我们将PIANO队列中所有CN PJI患者的基线特征和结果与CP病例进行了比较。我们报告了CN队列中的PJI诊断标准,并应用国际认可的PJI诊断指南来确定最佳的CN PJI检测方法。:在有24个月结局数据的650例患者中,55例(8.5%)为CN,595例为CP。与CP队列相比,CN患者更可能为女性(32例(58.2%)对245例(41.2%);P = 0.016),累及肩关节(5例(9.1%)对16例(2.7%);P = 0.026),且平均C反应蛋白水平较低(142mg/L对187mg/L;P = 0.016)。总体而言,CN患者的结局更好,培养阴性是24个月治疗成功的独立预测因素(调整优势比,aOR,为3.78,95%CI为1.65 - 8.67)。两个队列中次优诊断采样都很常见,使用美国传染病学会PJI诊断指南可提高CN PJI病例的检测率。:当前的PJI诊断指南在检测CN PJI的能力上有很大差异,需要进行全面的诊断采样以实现诊断的确定性。明确的手术管理策略应通过对感染类型的仔细评估来确定,而不仅仅取决于培养结果。

相似文献

1
Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections from the Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) cohort study.澳大利亚和新西兰人工关节感染观察性(PIANO)队列研究中培养阴性人工关节感染的特征与结局
J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 Sep 20;7(5):203-211. doi: 10.5194/jbji-7-203-2022. eCollection 2022.
2
Presentation and Outcomes of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Comparison of Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Disease.人工关节周围感染的表现和结局:阳性和阴性培养结果的比较。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Oct;22(8):828-835. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.302. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Similar Success Rate, Different Incidence of Complications.培养阴性和培养阳性假体周围关节感染的临床结局:成功率相似,并发症发生率不同。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):1420-1427. doi: 10.1111/os.13333. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Effective treatment of single-stage revision using intra-articular antibiotic infusion for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection.关节内抗生素灌注治疗培养阴性假体关节感染一期翻修的疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):336-344. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0820.R1.
5
Comparable clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.培养阴性和培养阳性假体周围关节感染的临床结局可比:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 16;18(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03692-x.
6
Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection.先前使用抗菌治疗是造成培养阴性人工关节感染的一个风险因素。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Aug;468(8):2039-45. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1338-0.
7
A Comparison of Outcomes of Culture positive and Culture negative Acute Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection following Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR).清创术、抗生素保留和假体保留(DAIR)治疗下培养阳性和培养阴性急性膝关节假体关节感染的结局比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2375-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03445-2. Epub 2022 Nov 27.
8
The Impact of Culture Negativity on the Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Chronic PJI.文化消极因素对慢性假体周围感染翻修全膝关节置换术结局的影响。
Microorganisms. 2024 Jul 8;12(7):1384. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12071384.
9
Long-term clinical outcome of two-stage revision surgery for infected hip arthroplasty using cement spacer: Culture negative versus culture positive.使用骨水泥间隔物的感染性髋关节置换二期翻修手术的长期临床结果:培养阴性与培养阳性对比。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499017754095. doi: 10.1177/2309499017754095.
10
Success of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Prosthetic Joint Infection Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study of 189 Cases.初次全膝关节置换术后假体关节感染清创、抗生素和保留植入物的成功:来自 189 例前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7 Suppl 2):S399-S404. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.024. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing Incidence, Aetiology and Outcomes of Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Population-Based Study in Iceland.人工关节感染的发病率、病因及转归变化:冰岛一项基于人群的研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 26;14(15):5289. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155289.
2
Outcomes after suppressive antimicrobial therapy for prosthetic joint infection: a prospective cohort study.人工关节感染抑制性抗菌治疗后的结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Jun 4;69(6):e0178424. doi: 10.1128/aac.01784-24. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
3
persistence in osteocytes: weathering the storm of antibiotics and autophagy/xenophagy.成骨细胞中的持续存在:抵御抗生素和自噬/异噬的风暴。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jun 10;14:1403289. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1403289. eCollection 2024.
4
Sex-related differences in periprosthetic joint infection research.人工关节周围感染研究中的性别差异。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2024 Apr 30;9(2):137-142. doi: 10.5194/jbji-9-137-2024. eCollection 2024.
5
Microbial Persistence, Replacement and Local Antimicrobial Therapy in Recurrent Bone and Joint Infection.复发性骨与关节感染中的微生物持续性、替代及局部抗菌治疗
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Apr 5;12(4):708. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040708.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of Treatment Success After Periprosthetic Joint Infection: 24-Month Follow up From a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study of 653 Patients.人工关节周围感染后治疗成功的预测因素:对653例患者进行多中心前瞻性观察队列研究的24个月随访
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Feb 2;9(3):ofac048. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac048. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Presentation and Outcomes of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Comparison of Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Disease.人工关节周围感染的表现和结局:阳性和阴性培养结果的比较。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Oct;22(8):828-835. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.302. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Infographic: The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection.信息图:人工关节周围感染的EBJIS定义。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jan;103-B(1):16-17. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B1.BJJ-2020-2417.
4
Cutibacterium acnes in shoulder surgery: a scoping review of strategies for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.肩外科中的痤疮丙酸杆菌:预防、诊断和治疗策略的范围综述。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jun;30(6):1410-1422. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
5
Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection Increases Following Early Aseptic Revision Surgery of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后早期无菌翻修手术会增加人工关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Dec;35(12):3661-3667. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.089. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Clinical Characteristics, Etiology, and Initial Management Strategy of Newly Diagnosed Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Cohort Study of 783 Patients.新诊断的人工关节周围感染的临床特征、病因及初始治疗策略:一项对783例患者的多中心、前瞻性观察队列研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 May 14;7(5):ofaa068. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa068. eCollection 2020 May.
7
Do Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections Have a Worse Outcome Than Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.文化阴性假体周围关节感染比文化阳性假体周围关节感染的预后更差吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 12;2018:6278012. doi: 10.1155/2018/6278012. eCollection 2018.
8
The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria.2018 年人工髋关节和膝关节感染定义:基于循证和验证的标准。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Long-term clinical outcome of two-stage revision surgery for infected hip arthroplasty using cement spacer: Culture negative versus culture positive.使用骨水泥间隔物的感染性髋关节置换二期翻修手术的长期临床结果:培养阴性与培养阳性对比。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 Jan-Apr;26(1):2309499017754095. doi: 10.1177/2309499017754095.
10
Two-stage revision for the culture-negative infected total hip arthroplasty : A comparative study.两阶段翻修术治疗培养阴性感染性全髋关节置换术:一项比较研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1 Supple A):3-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0626.R1.