Land J A, Evers J L, Boeckx W D, Muytjens A, Brosens I A
Microsurgery. 1987;8(2):64-7. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920080208.
Causes for failure of pregnancy after tubal reconstructive surgery are incompletely understood. The impact of microsurgical resection reanastomosis on ovum recovery was studied in the rabbit oviduct. One hundred sixty rabbits were divided into three groups: one experimental group in which a resection reanastomosis was made in the ampullar or isthmic tubal segment, respectively, and two control groups. After mating, ovum recovery was evaluated. In ampullary operated oviducts the ovum recovery rate was significantly lower compared with recovery rates in isthmically operated and in control oviducts. Furthermore, in ampullary operated oviducts peritoneal transmigration of ova was frequently observed. Disturbances in ovum pickup from the ovarian surface or the peritoneal cavity seem to be responsible for the decrease in recovery rate found in the ampullary operated oviducts.