Suppr超能文献

普遍新生儿眼部筛查:文献系统评价及国际指南回顾。

Universal newborn eye screening: a systematic review of the literature and review of international guidelines.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Cochrane Eyes and Vision, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2022 Oct 21;12:12003. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.12003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of universal screening for newborn eye abnormalities compared with no screening in improving infant vision and health outcomes.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Global Index Medicus, clinical trials databases, and bibliographies of relevant articles. We included randomized and observational studies of all newborns, regardless of illness or risk factors, that compared universal screening for any eye abnormality by eight weeks of age with no universal screening. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. We also reviewed available recommendations on newborn eye screening.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified but only three compared universal red reflex screening with no screening. Findings suggest that universal red reflex testing in maternity wards (MWs) may increase the number of newborns with congenital cataracts referred for eye care from MWs or well-baby clinics (WBCs) in the first year of life (risk ratio (RR) = 9.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-71.20; low certainty evidence). However, the effect of screening in WBC is uncertain (RR = 6.62, 95% CI = 0.87-50.09). The effect of MW or WBC screening on referral from any health care facility (MWs, WBCs, paediatrician clinic, other) in the first year is uncertain (MW screening: RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.63-2.39; WBC screening: RR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.46-2.05). However, referral or surgery by 6 weeks of age may be higher with universal MW screening (early referral: RR = 4.61, 95% CI = 1.12-19.01; early surgery: RR = 8.23, 95% CI = 1.13-59.80; low certainty evidence). The effect of WBC screening on early referral and surgery is uncertain (early referral: RR = 1.98, 95% CI = 0.43-9.19; early surgery: RR = 3.97, 95% CI = 0.50-31.33; very low certainty evidence). Universal red reflex testing may increase clinical conjunctivitis (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.01-1.47; low certainty evidence) but the effect on confirmed bacterial conjunctivitis is uncertain (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.76-1.90; very low-certainty evidence). Nine guidelines recommended universal newborn eye screening using red reflex testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the role of red reflex testing shortly after birth to increase early identification, referral, and surgery for congenital cataracts.

摘要

背景

本系统评价评估了对新生儿眼部异常进行普遍筛查与不筛查相比,在改善婴儿视力和健康结果方面的效果。

方法

我们检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、Embase、全球卫生、全球索引医学、临床试验数据库以及相关文章的参考文献。我们纳入了所有新生儿的随机和观察性研究,无论疾病或危险因素如何,将 8 周龄前对任何眼部异常进行普遍筛查与不进行普遍筛查进行比较。两位作者独立选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们使用 GRADE 评估证据的确定性。我们还审查了新生儿眼部筛查的现有建议。

结果

共确定了 14 项研究,但只有 3 项研究比较了普遍的红色反射筛查与不筛查。结果表明,在产科病房(MWs)进行普遍的红色反射测试可能会增加在生命的第一年中因先天性白内障而从 MWs 或婴儿健康诊所(WBCs)转诊接受眼科护理的新生儿数量(风险比(RR)=9.83,95%置信区间(CI)=1.36-71.20;低确定性证据)。然而,WBC 筛查的效果尚不确定(RR=6.62,95%CI=0.87-50.09)。MW 或 WBC 筛查对第一年任何医疗机构(MWs、WBCs、儿科医生诊所、其他)转诊的影响尚不确定(MW 筛查:RR=1.22,95%CI=0.63-2.39;WBC 筛查:RR=0.97,95%CI=0.46-2.05)。然而,普遍的 MW 筛查可能会更早地进行转诊或手术(早期转诊:RR=4.61,95%CI=1.12-19.01;早期手术:RR=8.23,95%CI=1.13-59.80;低确定性证据)。WBC 筛查对早期转诊和手术的影响尚不确定(早期转诊:RR=1.98,95%CI=0.43-9.19;早期手术:RR=3.97,95%CI=0.50-31.33;极低确定性证据)。普遍的红色反射测试可能会增加临床结膜炎(OR=1.22,95%CI=1.01-1.47;低确定性证据),但对确诊细菌性结膜炎的影响尚不确定(OR=1.20,95%CI=0.76-1.90;极低确定性证据)。九条指南建议使用红色反射测试对新生儿进行普遍的眼部筛查。

结论

证据支持在出生后不久进行红色反射测试,以增加对先天性白内障的早期识别、转诊和手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8375/9586142/f612f7257b82/jogh-12-12003-F1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验