Suppr超能文献

精神医学一年的数字化教学作为对 COVID-19 大流行的应对:2020 年和 2021 年两个暑期学期医学生的知识获取和内容评估。

One year of digital teaching in psychiatry as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic: Knowledge gain and content evaluation of medical students for two summer semesters in 2020 and 2021.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower-Saxony, Germany.

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 21;17(10):e0276660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276660. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

After the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, digital teaching had to be implemented by most universities at short notice and widely replaced classroom teaching. As a consequence, digital teaching further reduced direct social interaction for students. One year after the introduction of digital teaching formats at our university medical center (department of psychiatry and psychotherapy), teaching evaluation of students from summer semesters 2020 and 2021 (SS20, SS21) were compared. The main objective of this study was to objectify whether students evaluate digital teaching less favorably after one year of its implementation. Ratings of 311 medical students on (1) knowledge gain, (2) teaching contents and (3) subjective advantages of digital teaching were analyzed for the two separate cohorts SS20 (n = 175) and SS21 (n = 136). Students also rated their pandemic-related stress level, and if learning progress had been reduced by the pandemic in general. Significant knowledge gain was achieved for all included domains in psychiatry (all p < .001), and did not differ between SS20/SS21. Teaching contents in SS21 were rated worse in six out of eight domains compared to SS20 (p < .001 to .05). Also, subjective advantages of digital teaching vanished in most domains comparing the cohorts of SS21 and SS20 (p < .001 to .05). No differences were found for pandemic-related stress level and subjective learning progress. Limitations include the post-hoc design, possible bias from individual exam grades, and sampling bias. The present study showed that knowledge gain can be considered to be stable one year after the pandemic-related implementation of digital teaching. However, sustainability of this teaching format should be monitored critically: The subject of psychiatry and psychotherapy thrives on direct communication, which can be compromised when using digital formats only. In this light, implementation of more interactive formats in digital teaching is discussed.

摘要

2020 年 COVID-19 大流行开始后,大多数大学都不得不紧急实施数字教学,广泛取代课堂教学。因此,数字教学进一步减少了学生的直接社交互动。在我们大学医学中心(精神病学和心理治疗系)引入数字教学模式一年后,比较了 2020 年夏季学期(SS20)和 2021 年夏季学期(SS21)学生的教学评估。本研究的主要目的是客观地衡量在实施数字教学一年后,学生是否对其评价较低。对两个独立队列 SS20(n=175)和 SS21(n=136)的 311 名医学生的(1)知识获取、(2)教学内容和(3)数字教学主观优势进行了分析。学生还评估了他们与大流行相关的压力水平,以及大流行是否总体上降低了他们的学习进度。精神病学所有纳入领域均显著获得知识(均 p<0.001),且 SS20/SS21 之间无差异。与 SS20 相比,SS21 中 8 个领域中的 6 个领域的教学内容评分更差(p<0.001 至 p<0.05)。此外,与 SS20 相比,SS21 两个队列在大多数领域的数字教学主观优势也消失了(p<0.001 至 p<0.05)。与大流行相关的压力水平和主观学习进度没有差异。局限性包括事后设计、个别考试成绩可能存在的偏差和抽样偏差。本研究表明,数字教学与大流行相关实施一年后,知识获取可被认为是稳定的。然而,应该批判性地监测这种教学模式的可持续性:精神病学和心理治疗学的主题依赖于直接交流,而仅使用数字格式可能会损害这种交流。在这方面,讨论了在数字教学中实施更多互动格式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a719/9586409/c6ada8f7772d/pone.0276660.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验