• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥斯威斯德里伤残指数和颈部伤残指数中缺失项目的处理。瑞典脊柱登记处Swespine的一项研究。

Handling of missing items in the Oswestry disability index and the neck disability index. A study from Swespine, the National Swedish spine register.

作者信息

Joelson Anders, Fritzell Peter, Hägg Olle

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Orebro University School of Medical Sciences and Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden.

The National Swedish Spine Register (Swespine), Jonkoping, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2022 Dec;31(12):3484-3491. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07425-2. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-022-07425-2
PMID:36271985
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) scoring algorithms used by the Swedish spine register (Swespine) until April 2022 handled missing items somewhat differently than the original algorithms. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate possible differences in the ODI and NDI scores between the Swespine and the original scoring algorithms.

METHODS

Patients surgically treated for degenerative conditions of the lumbar or cervical spine between 2003-2019 (lumbar) and 2006-2019 (cervical) were identified in Swespine. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative ODI/NDI data were used to evaluate differences between the Swespine and the original ODI/NDI algorithms with adjustment for at most 1 or 2 missing items using mean imputation.

RESULTS

The preoperative as well as the 1-year postoperative ODI/NDI were approximately 1 unit out of 100 smaller for the Swespine algorithm, irrespective of adjustment model. The differences between preoperative and postoperative ODI/NDI scores were similar between the Swespine and the original scoring algorithms. There were occasional statistically significant differences between the preoperative-postoperative differences due to large sample sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

The Swespine algorithms, used until April 2022, underestimated the ODI and NDI by approximately 1 out of 100 units compared with the original algorithms. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences between the original algorithms when adjusting for at most 1 or 2 missing items. The algorithm has now been changed, also for historical data.

摘要

目的

瑞典脊柱登记系统(Swespine)在2022年4月之前使用的奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分算法在处理缺失项目方面与原始算法略有不同。本研究的目的是评估Swespine与原始评分算法在ODI和NDI评分上的可能差异。

方法

在Swespine中识别出2003 - 2019年(腰椎)和2006 - 2019年(颈椎)因腰椎或颈椎退行性疾病接受手术治疗的患者。术前和术后1年的ODI/NDI数据用于评估Swespine与原始ODI/NDI算法之间的差异,并使用均值插补法对最多1或2个缺失项目进行调整。

结果

无论调整模型如何,Swespine算法的术前以及术后1年的ODI/NDI比原始算法约低1个百分点(满分100分)。Swespine与原始评分算法之间术前和术后ODI/NDI评分的差异相似。由于样本量较大,术前与术后差异偶尔存在统计学显著差异。

结论

与原始算法相比,直到2022年4月使用的Swespine算法将ODI和NDI低估了约1个百分点(满分100分)。此外,在对最多1或2个缺失项目进行调整时,原始算法之间没有统计学显著差异。该算法现已更改,历史数据也同样适用。

相似文献

1
Handling of missing items in the Oswestry disability index and the neck disability index. A study from Swespine, the National Swedish spine register.奥斯威斯德里伤残指数和颈部伤残指数中缺失项目的处理。瑞典脊柱登记处Swespine的一项研究。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Dec;31(12):3484-3491. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07425-2. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
2
Developing the Total Disability Index Based on an Analysis of the Interrelationships and Limitations of Oswestry and Neck Disability Index.基于对奥斯维斯特里和颈部残疾指数的相互关系及局限性分析开发全残疾指数。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):74-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001159.
3
Spine patients demystified: what are the predictive factors of poor surgical outcome in patients after elective cervical and lumbar spine surgery?脊柱患者揭秘:择期颈椎和腰椎手术后患者手术结局不良的预测因素有哪些?
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1529-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.550. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
4
Estimating measurement error of the Oswestry Disability Index with missing data.估算存在缺失数据时Oswestry功能障碍指数的测量误差。
Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):975-982. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.013. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests in cervical spine surgery.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)计算机自适应测试在颈椎手术中的验证
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):268-279. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17661. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) instruments in patients with spinal disorders.患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)、颈椎残障指数(NDI)和 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)在脊柱疾病患者中的反应性。
Spine J. 2019 Jan;19(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.355. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
7
Diabetes Is Related to Worse Patient-Reported Outcomes at Two Years Following Spine Surgery.糖尿病与脊柱手术后两年内患者报告结局恶化相关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 6;98(1):15-22. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00297.
8
The effect of psychosocial measures of resilience and self-efficacy in patients with neck and lower back pain.心理社会因素(韧性和自我效能)对颈痛和腰痛患者的影响。
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):232-237. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
9
Validation of the recently developed Total Disability Index: a single measure of disability in neck and back pain patients.最新开发的全残疾指数的验证:一种用于测量颈肩腰背痛患者残疾情况的单一指标。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Dec 6;32(4):533-541. doi: 10.3171/2019.9.SPINE19331. Print 2020 Apr 1.
10
Do PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Correlate to the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Trauma Patients?脊柱创伤患者的 PROMIS 体力功能、疼痛干扰和抑郁与 Oswestry 功能障碍指数和颈椎残障指数相关吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Jun 1;45(11):764-769. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003376.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided injection acupotomy as a minimally invasive intervention therapy for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a randomized control trial.超声引导下注射针刀松解术治疗神经根型颈椎病的随机对照试验。
Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):2233556. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2233556.