Suppr超能文献

决定中国黄土丘陵区优势植被物种间土壤斥水性斑块分布的物理化学和生物因素。

Physicochemical and biological factors determining the patchy distribution of soil water repellency among species of dominant vegetation in loess hilly region of China.

作者信息

Chai Xiaohong, Xu Xuexuan, Li Lushan, Wang Weiwei, Li Shuo, Geming Palixiati, Qu Yuanyuan, Zhang Qi, Ren Xiuzi, Xu Yuanhui, Li Mengyao

机构信息

College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, China.

Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, China.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 6;13:908035. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.908035. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Soil water repellency (SWR) is a physical phenomenon whereby water cannot penetrate or has difficulty penetrating the soil surface. There are many factors involved in its occurrence, but the main factors controlling its emergence in loess remain unclear. In this work, we have studied numerous physicochemical and biological factors functioning in different dominant vegetations ( Carr., L., and L.) in a loess hilly region by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high-throughput sequencing techniques. We observed that more than 75% of the soils under and are categorized as slightly or strongly water repellent, while nearly 50% of the soils under are categorized as severely to extremely water repellent. The relative concentrations of total free lipids in the soil in the same water-repellency class were > > , where fatty acids, alkanols, and sterols were positively correlated with SWR, whereas alkanes were not. For the abundance and diversity index of bacterial and fungal communities, the three species ranked in the following order: ≈ > . Thus, solvent-extractable polar waxes were indicated to be better preserved in water-repellent soils under due to lower microbial diversity than and . Here, we demonstrate polar waxes to be the principal factor controlling SWR. Moreover, the dominant phyla of fungi varied greatly than those of bacteria under three vegetation types. Correlation analysis showed that the abundance of in dominant bacteria increased with SWR. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling suggested the fungal community in different water-repellent soils under to vary more than those under and . The indicator species mainly belonged to in bacteria and in fungi at the phylum level; this finding was further supported by the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe). Additionally, GC-MS identified a small amount of ergosterol, a specific biomarker of fungi under . These pieces of evidence collectively reveal that severe to extreme SWR occurs under and appears to be the most influenced by fungi and actinomycetes when the topsoil is close to air drying. However, there is a need for further testing on different plant species or land use.

摘要

土壤斥水性(SWR)是一种物理现象,即水无法渗透或难以渗透土壤表面。其发生涉及许多因素,但控制黄土中其出现的主要因素仍不清楚。在这项工作中,我们通过气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC - MS)和高通量测序技术,研究了黄土丘陵区不同优势植被( Carr.、 L.和 L.)中起作用的众多物理化学和生物因素。我们观察到, 和 下超过75%的土壤被归类为轻度或重度斥水,而 下近50%的土壤被归类为极重度斥水。同一斥水等级的土壤中总游离脂质的相对浓度为 > > ,其中脂肪酸、链烷醇和甾醇与土壤斥水性呈正相关,而烷烃则不然。对于细菌和真菌群落的丰度和多样性指数,这三个物种的排序如下: ≈ > 。因此,由于 下的微生物多样性低于 和 ,表明可溶剂萃取的极性蜡在 下的斥水土壤中保存得更好。在此,我们证明极性蜡是控制土壤斥水性的主要因素。此外,在三种植被类型下,真菌的优势门类比细菌的变化大得多。相关性分析表明,优势细菌中 的丰度随土壤斥水性增加。非度量多维尺度分析表明, 下不同斥水土壤中的真菌群落比 和 下的变化更大。在门水平上,指示物种在细菌中主要属于 ,在真菌中主要属于 ;线性判别分析(LDA)效应大小(LEfSe)进一步支持了这一发现。此外,GC - MS鉴定出少量麦角固醇(ergosterol),这是 下真菌的一种特定生物标志物。这些证据共同表明,在 下会出现极重度到极端的土壤斥水性,并且当表土接近风干时,似乎受真菌和放线菌的影响最大。然而,需要对不同植物物种或土地利用进行进一步测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99f3/9582861/724e9bfbeac3/fpls-13-908035-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Effects of species mixtures on soil water storage in the semiarid hilly gully region.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Nov 1;897:165409. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165409. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
4
Variations of soil microbial communities accompanied by different vegetation restoration in an open-cut iron mining area.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 20;704:135243. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135243. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
6
The influence of vegetation on soil water repellency-markers and soil hydrophobicity.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:608-620. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.077. Epub 2016 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Soil water repellency and the five spheres of influence: A review of mechanisms, measurement and ecological implications.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 15;787:147429. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147429. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
2
microeco: an R package for data mining in microbial community ecology.
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021 Jan 26;97(2). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa255.
3
Plant and soil communities are associated with the response of soil water repellency to environmental stress.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 15;687:929-938. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.052. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
4
Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2.
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9.
6
Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome.
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Oct;15(10):579-590. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
7
Rhizosphere hydrophobicity: A positive trait in the competition for water.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0182188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182188. eCollection 2017.
8
VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics.
PeerJ. 2016 Oct 18;4:e2584. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2584. eCollection 2016.
9
Fungal community composition in soils subjected to long-term chemical fertilization is most influenced by the type of organic matter.
Environ Microbiol. 2016 Dec;18(12):5137-5150. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13512. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
10
The influence of vegetation on soil water repellency-markers and soil hydrophobicity.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:608-620. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.077. Epub 2016 May 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验