Kim Ki Hoon, Kim Seung Woo, Cho Jinhyuk, Chung Hye Yoon, Shin Ha Young
Department of Neurology, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 5;13:978997. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.978997. eCollection 2022.
Anti-titin antibodies are antistriational antibodies associated with thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis (MG). We evaluated whether the patients with anti-titin antibody are more frequently hospitalized to manage thymoma-associated MG than those patients without anti-titin antibody.
Patients with thymoma-associated MG who conducted the serological test for anti-titin antibody were retrospectively included. Disease severity, treatments, MG-related annual hospitalization rate, and MG-related emergency room (ER) visit rate were compared between the patients with anti-titin antibody and those patients without anti-titin antibody. Multivariate analysis was conducted to analyze the association between anti-titin antibody serostatus and multiple admissions (hospitalization or ER visit of ≥2 times).
Of the 64 included patients, 31 (48.4%) patients were positive for anti-titin antibody (titin+ group) and 33 (51.6%) patients were negative for anti-titin antibody (titin- group). Both the annual rate of MG-related hospitalization and ER visit were significantly higher in the titin+ group [0.2 (0.1-0.6) and 0.1 (0-0.2) per year, respectively] than those in the titin- group [0 (0-0.2) and 0 (0-0) per year, = 0.004 and = 0.006, respectively]. In multivariate analysis, positive anti-titin antibody was still significantly associated with multiple admissions [odds ratio (OR) 4.11, 95% CI 1.05-16.03] compared to the titin- group as a reference after adjusting for sex, follow-up duration, age at onset, systemic chemotherapy, and the Masaoka staging.
The presence of anti-titin antibody is associated with more frequent hospital utilization. Personalized explanation and careful monitoring strategy could be required in patients with thymoma-associated MG with anti-titin antibody for the timely detection of relapses.
抗肌联蛋白抗体是与胸腺瘤相关的重症肌无力(MG)相关的抗横纹肌抗体。我们评估了抗肌联蛋白抗体阳性的患者相较于抗肌联蛋白抗体阴性的患者,因胸腺瘤相关MG住院治疗的频率是否更高。
回顾性纳入接受抗肌联蛋白抗体血清学检测的胸腺瘤相关MG患者。比较抗肌联蛋白抗体阳性患者与抗肌联蛋白抗体阴性患者的疾病严重程度、治疗情况、MG相关的年住院率和MG相关的急诊室(ER)就诊率。进行多因素分析以分析抗肌联蛋白抗体血清状态与多次入院(住院或ER就诊≥2次)之间的关联。
在纳入的64例患者中,31例(48.4%)抗肌联蛋白抗体阳性(肌联蛋白阳性组),33例(51.6%)抗肌联蛋白抗体阴性(肌联蛋白阴性组)。肌联蛋白阳性组MG相关的年住院率和ER就诊率均显著高于肌联蛋白阴性组[分别为每年0.2(0.1 - 0.6)和0.1(0 - 0.2)],而肌联蛋白阴性组分别为每年0(0 - 0.2)和0(0 - 0),P分别为0.004和0.006。在多因素分析中,以肌联蛋白阴性组为参照,在调整性别、随访时间、发病年龄、全身化疗和马萨oka分期后,抗肌联蛋白抗体阳性仍与多次入院显著相关[比值比(OR)4.11,95%可信区间1.05 - 16.03]。
抗肌联蛋白抗体的存在与更频繁的住院治疗相关。对于抗肌联蛋白抗体阳性的胸腺瘤相关MG患者,可能需要个性化的解释和仔细的监测策略,以便及时发现复发情况。