Columbia University, United States.
Columbia University, United States.
Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;137:107524. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107524. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
The adolescent health consequences of the school-to-prison pipeline remain underexplored. We test whether initiating components of the school-to-prison pipeline-suspensions, expulsions, and school policing-are associated with higher school-average levels of student substance use, depressed feelings, and developmental risk in the following year.
We linked 2003-2014 data from the California Healthy Kids Survey and the Civil Rights Data Collection from over 4,800 schools and 4,950,000 students. With lagged multi-level models, we estimated relationships between the school prevalence of total discipline, out-of-school discipline, and police-involved discipline, and standardized school-average levels of 6 substance use measures and 8 measures of developmental risk, respectively.
The prevalence of school discipline predicted subsequent school-mean substance use and developmental risk. A one-unit higher prevalence of total discipline predicted higher school levels (in standard deviations) of binge drinking alcohol (0.14, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.17), drinking alcohol (0.15, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.18), smoking tobacco (0.09, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.12), using cannabis (0.16, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.19), using other drugs (0.17, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.21), and violence/harassment (0.16, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.2). Total discipline predicted lower levels of reported community support (-0.07, 95% CI: -0.1, -0.05), feeling safe in school (-0.12, 95% CI: -0.16, -0.09), and school support (-0.16, 95% CI: -0.19, -0.12). Associations were greater in magnitude for more severe out-of-school discipline. Findings were inconsistent for police-involved discipline.
Exclusionary school discipline and school policing-core elements of the school-to-prison pipeline-are previously unidentified population predictors of adolescent substance use and developmental risk.
学校到监狱流水线对青少年健康造成的后果仍未得到充分研究。我们检验了启动学校到监狱流水线的组成部分(停学、开除和学校治安)是否与次年学生更高的校内平均药物使用、抑郁情绪和发展风险有关。
我们将来自加利福尼亚健康儿童调查和民权数据收集的 2003 年至 2014 年的数据,从 4800 多所学校和 495 万名学生中进行了链接。使用滞后多层模型,我们分别估计了总纪律、校外纪律和警察参与纪律在学校中的流行程度与 6 项药物使用措施和 8 项发展风险措施之间的关系。
学校纪律的流行程度预测了随后的学校平均药物使用和发展风险。总纪律的流行程度每增加一个单位,就预示着更高的学校水平(标准差)的酗酒(0.14,95%置信区间:0.11,0.17)、饮酒(0.15,95%置信区间:0.12,0.18)、吸烟(0.09,95%置信区间:0.06,0.12)、使用大麻(0.16,95%置信区间:0.14,0.19)、使用其他药物(0.17,95%置信区间:0.14,0.21)和暴力/骚扰(0.16,95%置信区间:0.12,0.2)。总纪律预测报告的社区支持度降低(-0.07,95%置信区间:-0.1,-0.05)、在学校感到安全(-0.12,95%置信区间:-0.16,-0.09)和学校支持度降低(-0.16,95%置信区间:-0.19,-0.12)。对于更严重的校外纪律,关联的幅度更大。对于涉及警察的纪律,调查结果不一致。
排斥性的学校纪律和学校治安——学校到监狱流水线的核心要素——是以前未被识别的青少年药物使用和发展风险的人群预测因素。