Suppr超能文献

学校到监狱流水线的附带后果:青少年物质使用与发展风险。

Collateral consequences of the school-to-prison pipeline: Adolescent substance use and developmental risk.

机构信息

Columbia University, United States.

Columbia University, United States.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;137:107524. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107524. Epub 2022 Oct 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The adolescent health consequences of the school-to-prison pipeline remain underexplored. We test whether initiating components of the school-to-prison pipeline-suspensions, expulsions, and school policing-are associated with higher school-average levels of student substance use, depressed feelings, and developmental risk in the following year.

METHOD

We linked 2003-2014 data from the California Healthy Kids Survey and the Civil Rights Data Collection from over 4,800 schools and 4,950,000 students. With lagged multi-level models, we estimated relationships between the school prevalence of total discipline, out-of-school discipline, and police-involved discipline, and standardized school-average levels of 6 substance use measures and 8 measures of developmental risk, respectively.

RESULTS

The prevalence of school discipline predicted subsequent school-mean substance use and developmental risk. A one-unit higher prevalence of total discipline predicted higher school levels (in standard deviations) of binge drinking alcohol (0.14, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.17), drinking alcohol (0.15, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.18), smoking tobacco (0.09, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.12), using cannabis (0.16, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.19), using other drugs (0.17, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.21), and violence/harassment (0.16, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.2). Total discipline predicted lower levels of reported community support (-0.07, 95% CI: -0.1, -0.05), feeling safe in school (-0.12, 95% CI: -0.16, -0.09), and school support (-0.16, 95% CI: -0.19, -0.12). Associations were greater in magnitude for more severe out-of-school discipline. Findings were inconsistent for police-involved discipline.

CONCLUSION

Exclusionary school discipline and school policing-core elements of the school-to-prison pipeline-are previously unidentified population predictors of adolescent substance use and developmental risk.

摘要

目的

学校到监狱流水线对青少年健康造成的后果仍未得到充分研究。我们检验了启动学校到监狱流水线的组成部分(停学、开除和学校治安)是否与次年学生更高的校内平均药物使用、抑郁情绪和发展风险有关。

方法

我们将来自加利福尼亚健康儿童调查和民权数据收集的 2003 年至 2014 年的数据,从 4800 多所学校和 495 万名学生中进行了链接。使用滞后多层模型,我们分别估计了总纪律、校外纪律和警察参与纪律在学校中的流行程度与 6 项药物使用措施和 8 项发展风险措施之间的关系。

结果

学校纪律的流行程度预测了随后的学校平均药物使用和发展风险。总纪律的流行程度每增加一个单位,就预示着更高的学校水平(标准差)的酗酒(0.14,95%置信区间:0.11,0.17)、饮酒(0.15,95%置信区间:0.12,0.18)、吸烟(0.09,95%置信区间:0.06,0.12)、使用大麻(0.16,95%置信区间:0.14,0.19)、使用其他药物(0.17,95%置信区间:0.14,0.21)和暴力/骚扰(0.16,95%置信区间:0.12,0.2)。总纪律预测报告的社区支持度降低(-0.07,95%置信区间:-0.1,-0.05)、在学校感到安全(-0.12,95%置信区间:-0.16,-0.09)和学校支持度降低(-0.16,95%置信区间:-0.19,-0.12)。对于更严重的校外纪律,关联的幅度更大。对于涉及警察的纪律,调查结果不一致。

结论

排斥性的学校纪律和学校治安——学校到监狱流水线的核心要素——是以前未被识别的青少年药物使用和发展风险的人群预测因素。

相似文献

1
Collateral consequences of the school-to-prison pipeline: Adolescent substance use and developmental risk.
Addict Behav. 2023 Feb;137:107524. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107524. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
2
School Health Predictors of the School-to-Prison Pipeline: Substance Use and Developmental Risk and Resilience Factors.
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Mar;70(3):463-469. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.09.032. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
4
Are School Substance Use Policy Violation Disciplinary Consequences Associated with Student Engagement in Cannabis?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;17(15):5549. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155549.
5
A Mixed-Studies Review of the School-to-Prison Pipeline and a Call to Action for School Nurses.
J Sch Nurs. 2021 Feb;37(1):51-60. doi: 10.1177/1059840520972003. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
School-level substance use: effects on early adolescents' alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Jul;71(4):488-95. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.488.
8
[Prevalence and predictors of psychoactive substance use among men in prisons].
Gac Sanit. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
Identifying the Mental Health Profiles of Black Adolescents Who Experience School Policing and School Discipline: A Person-Centered Approach.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Aug;61(8):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2021.11.029. Epub 2021 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the School-to-Prison Pipeline: How School Suspensions Influence Incarceration During Young Adulthood.
Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2020 Jul;18(3):235-255. doi: 10.1177/1541204019880945. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
2
Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies.
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):281-295. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
3
Sent Home versus Being Arrested: The Relative Influence of School and Police Intervention on Drug Use.
Justice Q. 2020;37(6):985-1011. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2018.1561924. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
4
Association between county jail incarceration and cause-specific county mortality in the USA, 1987-2017: a retrospective, longitudinal study.
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e240-e248. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30283-8. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
County Jail Incarceration Rates and County Mortality Rates in the United States, 1987-2016.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(S1):S109-S115. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305413.
6
Documenting and Addressing the Health Impacts of Carceral Systems.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(S1):S5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305475.
7
Utilization of Mental Health Services in Educational Setting by Adolescents in the United States.
J Sch Health. 2019 May;89(5):393-401. doi: 10.1111/josh.12753. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
9
A Vicious Cycle: A Social-Psychological Account of Extreme Racial Disparities in School Discipline.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 May;11(3):381-98. doi: 10.1177/1745691616635592.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验