Torres Louise, Schuch Alice, Longo Larisse, Valentini Bruna Bressan, Galvão Gabriela Schneider, Luchese Eduardo, Pinzon Carlos, Bartels Rodrigo, Álvares-da-Silva Mário Reis
Graduate Program in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 90035-003, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Department of Radiology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Department of Radiology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre 90035-000, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Ann Hepatol. 2023 Jan-Feb;28(1):100774. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2022.100774. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
Liver fibrosis is an important prognosis marker in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Biopsy has been considered the gold-standard method for measuring liver fibrosis; however, it is an invasive procedure. Non-invasive diagnostic tools have been developed, such as clinical scores and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), which is the most accurate non-invasive method to determine liver fibrosis. Thus, the aim was to determine the NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) and the Fibrosis-4 Score (FIB-4) cut-off points that best identify NAFLD patients at risk for developing liver fibrosis.
Single-center cross-sectional study with prospective recruitment of NAFLD (training-cohort) and MAFLD (validation-cohort) patients undergoing MRE. The NFS and the FIB-4 cut-off points that best-differentiated patients with fibrosis, using the MRE as the standard method, were determined.
Two cohorts were analyzed, a training cohort that included the initial 183 patients with NAFLD and a validation cohort that included 289 patients. In the training cohort, 60.1% had mild steatosis and 11.5% had liver fibrosis ≥ F1 by MRE. ROC curves were developed for FIB-4 and NFS, and the cut-off points chosen were 1.505 (sensitivity=85% and specificity=86%) for FIB-4 and -0.835 (sensitivity=100% and specificity=70%) for NFS, showing greater specificity than the cut-off points currently used (51% and 76%, respectively). The two cohorts exhibited similar characteristics and similar sensitivity and specificity results for the chosen cut-off points.
This study has shown cut-off points with greater specificity and excellent sensitivity to guide the indication for further liver evaluation by MRE in NAFLD patients.
肝纤维化是非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的一项重要预后指标。肝活检一直被视为测量肝纤维化的金标准方法;然而,它是一种侵入性操作。现已开发出非侵入性诊断工具,如临床评分和磁共振弹性成像(MRE),后者是确定肝纤维化最准确的非侵入性方法。因此,本研究旨在确定能最佳识别有发生肝纤维化风险的NAFLD患者的NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS)和纤维化-4评分(FIB-4)的临界值。
一项单中心横断面研究,前瞻性招募接受MRE检查的NAFLD(训练队列)和MAFLD(验证队列)患者。以MRE作为标准方法,确定能最佳区分纤维化患者的NFS和FIB-4临界值。
分析了两个队列,一个训练队列包括最初的183例NAFLD患者,一个验证队列包括289例患者。在训练队列中,60.1%有轻度脂肪变性,11.5%通过MRE显示肝纤维化≥F1。绘制了FIB-4和NFS的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),选择的临界值为FIB-4的1.505(灵敏度=85%,特异度=86%)和NFS的-0.835(灵敏度=100%,特异度=70%),显示出比目前使用的临界值(分别为51%和76%)更高的特异度。两个队列具有相似的特征,且所选临界值的灵敏度和特异度结果相似。
本研究显示了具有更高特异度和优异灵敏度的临界值,可指导对NAFLD患者进行MRE进一步肝脏评估的指征。