Kaplan Joseph M, Alexis Jamil, Grimaldi Gregory, Islam Mohammed, Izard Stephanie M, Lee Tai-Ping
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Yale New Haven Health Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, CT, USA.
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jan 25;8:7. doi: 10.21037/tgh-22-27. eCollection 2023.
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the world's most prevalent chronic liver disease. In advanced stages, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and scoring panels Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) are useful noninvasive alternatives to liver biopsy for fibrosis staging. Our study aimed to determine how well MRE corresponds with both FIB-4 and NFS at different stages of fibrosis.
We performed a retrospective chart review of patients age ≥18 with NAFLD as their only known liver disease who underwent MRE within six months of a lab draw. MRE stratified patients into fibrosis stages using kPa values. FIB-4 categorized patients as Advanced Fibrosis Excluded, Further Investigation Needed or Advanced Fibrosis Likely. NFS categorized them as F0-2, Indeterminate or F3-4. MRE fibrosis staging was compared to FIB-4 and NFS for both ruling out advanced fibrosis and identifying advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis.
Overall, 193 patients met inclusion criteria. Our statistical analysis included calculating positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs), which are the proportions of positive and negative fibrosis screening results that correspond to positive and negative MRE results respectively. NPV for FIB-4 (0.84) and NFS (0.89) in the 'rule out advanced fibrosis' category signify that 84% and 89% of respective biomarker scores correspond to MRE in early stage disease. The PPV for FIB-4 and NFS in the 'identify advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis' category signify 63% and 72% of respective biomarker scores correspond to MRE in late stage disease.
FIB-4 and NFS scores indicating little to no fibrosis correspond extremely well with MRE, while scores suggesting advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis correspond less convincingly. MRE shows promise as an effective alternative to liver biopsy, however our study suggests FIB-4 and NFS alone may be sufficient for fibrosis staging, particularly in early stage NAFLD.
非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是全球最常见的慢性肝病。在疾病晚期,它与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。磁共振弹性成像(MRE)以及Fibrosis-4(FIB-4)评分系统和非酒精性脂肪性肝病纤维化评分(NFS)是用于肝纤维化分期的肝活检的有用非侵入性替代方法。我们的研究旨在确定MRE在不同纤维化阶段与FIB-4和NFS的符合程度。
我们对年龄≥18岁、仅患有NAFLD这一已知肝病且在实验室抽血后6个月内接受MRE检查的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。MRE使用千帕值将患者分为不同的纤维化阶段。FIB-4将患者分为排除晚期纤维化、需要进一步检查或可能为晚期纤维化。NFS将患者分为F0-2、不确定或F3-4。将MRE纤维化分期与FIB-4和NFS进行比较,以排除晚期纤维化和识别晚期纤维化/肝硬化。
总体而言,193名患者符合纳入标准。我们的统计分析包括计算阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),它们分别是与阳性和阴性MRE结果相对应的阳性和阴性纤维化筛查结果的比例。在“排除晚期纤维化”类别中,FIB-4(0.84)和NFS(0.89)的NPV表明,在早期疾病中,各自生物标志物评分的84%和89%与MRE相对应。在“识别晚期纤维化/肝硬化”类别中,FIB-4和NFS的PPV表明,在晚期疾病中,各自生物标志物评分的63%和72%与MRE相对应。
FIB-4和NFS评分显示几乎没有纤维化时与MRE的符合程度非常好,而提示晚期纤维化/肝硬化的评分则不太令人信服。MRE有望成为肝活检的有效替代方法,然而我们的研究表明,单独使用FIB-4和NFS可能足以进行纤维化分期,特别是在早期非酒精性脂肪性肝病中。