Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, Roma 00161, Italy; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU Henri Mondor, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Créteil 94010, France.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery, CHU Henri Mondor, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Créteil 94010, France.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb;124(1S):101319. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.10.018. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
Non-surgical rhinoplasty is one of the terms used to describe the technique of injecting fillers into the nasal pyramid region for aesthetic, and sometimes functional, purposes. Although it is now an extremely popular practice, the techniques proposed and the products used are different. This inhomogeneity is also found regarding the treatment longevity.
A literature review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). It was realized to collect information on this disputed topic. Pubmed/MEDLINE database was explored.
A total of 228 articles were extracted from the basic literature search. 81 of these were excluded based on the content of the title and abstract. All 147 remaining articles were submitted for full-reading. 49 of these were excluded because the injection product used by the authors was not a hyaluronic acid based filler; while 82 of these were excluded because they provided no indication regarding the longevity of the treatment. Of the 16 selected studies, according to six authors, the duration of treatment is therefore between 8 and 12 months. For all the others, instead, the results seem to last longer than this period. The longest time interval was 8 years.
Establishing with certainty the longevity of non-surgical rhinoplasty seemed to be extremely complex. In the light of this discordant data seems to be essential to deepen the argument. A study using imaging techniques and/or standardized photographic material appears essential to further investigate this controversial topic.
非手术性隆鼻是用于描述将填充物注射到鼻锥体区域以达到美容和(或)有时是功能目的的技术术语之一。尽管现在这种技术已经非常流行,但所提出的技术和使用的产品却存在差异。这种不均匀性也存在于治疗的持久性方面。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行文献回顾。旨在收集有关这个有争议的话题的信息。探索了 Pubmed/MEDLINE 数据库。
从基础文献检索中提取了 228 篇文章。根据标题和摘要的内容排除了 81 篇。提交了全部 147 篇剩余文章进行全文阅读。由于作者使用的注射产品不是基于透明质酸的填充物,因此排除了其中的 49 篇;而由于 82 篇文章没有提供关于治疗持久性的说明,因此排除了其中的 82 篇。在 16 项选定的研究中,根据 6 位作者的说法,治疗的持续时间因此在 8 到 12 个月之间。而对于其他所有研究,治疗效果似乎持续时间更长。最长的时间间隔为 8 年。
确定非手术性隆鼻的持久性似乎极其复杂。鉴于这些不一致的数据,深入探讨这个问题显得尤为重要。使用成像技术和/或标准化摄影材料的研究似乎对于进一步研究这个有争议的话题至关重要。