Tahan Shoushtari Shahin, Savoldelli Charles, Gobillot Héloïse, Castillo Laurent, Poissonnet Gilles, Kestemont Philippe, D'Andréa Grégoire, Vandersteen Clair
Head and Neck Departement, Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 Avenue de Valombrose, UCA, 06300 Nice, France.
Head and Neck Departement, Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 Avenue de Valombrose, UR2CA-REBOOT, UCA, 06300 Nice, France.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5394. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155394.
Nasal reconstructive surgery following skin cancer resection is challenging, with esthetic concerns impacting patients' quality of life. Non-surgical rhinoplasty may be an alternative to repeated surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate non-surgical rhinoplasty esthetic benefits and subjective patient outcomes after skin cancer resection. We conducted a retrospective study on patients with post-operative esthetic dissatisfaction after nasal skin cancer surgery, who underwent non-surgical rhinoplasty with hyaluronic acid. Subjective benefits were evaluated with the FACE-Q Rhinoplasty self-questionnaire at three consultations: before injection (baseline), and at one and two months after. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional Vectra H2 photographs were used to assess subjective esthetic concerns and objective volumetric changes. The study included six female patients with an average age of 58.3 years. They had undergone, on average, five nasal surgeries for cancer. The mean FACE-Q scores were 53.3 (±10.31), 77.5 (±4.18), and 79.7 (±6.76), respectively, at baseline, one month, and two months. Significant differences were observed between baseline and one month ( < 0.001) and between baseline and two months ( < 0.001), but not between one and two months. The was a mean volumetric gain of 1.13 mL at one month and 1.19 mL at two months. This preliminary study suggested that hyaluronic acid-based non-surgical rhinoplasty could improve esthetic outcomes and quality of life in patients who had undergone nasal skin cancer surgery. These findings highlight a potential role for this minimally invasive technique in selected post-reconstructive cases, although the small sample size limited the generalizability of the results and underlined the need for further prospective evaluation.
皮肤癌切除术后的鼻整形手术具有挑战性,美观问题会影响患者的生活质量。非手术隆鼻术可能是反复手术的一种替代方案。本研究旨在评估非手术隆鼻术在皮肤癌切除术后的美学益处和患者主观结果。我们对鼻皮肤癌手术后存在术后美学不满意的患者进行了一项回顾性研究,这些患者接受了透明质酸非手术隆鼻术。在三次会诊时使用FACE-Q隆鼻自我问卷评估主观益处:注射前(基线)、注射后1个月和2个月。使用二维和三维Vectra H2照片评估主观美学问题和客观体积变化。该研究纳入了6名平均年龄为58.3岁的女性患者。她们平均接受了5次鼻部癌症手术。在基线、1个月和2个月时,平均FACE-Q评分分别为53.3(±10.31)、77.5(±4.18)和79.7(±6.76)。在基线和1个月之间(<0.001)以及基线和2个月之间(<0.001)观察到显著差异,但在1个月和2个月之间未观察到显著差异。1个月时平均体积增加1.13 mL,2个月时平均体积增加1.19 mL。这项初步研究表明,基于透明质酸的非手术隆鼻术可以改善鼻皮肤癌手术患者的美学效果和生活质量。这些发现突出了这种微创技术在选定的重建后病例中的潜在作用,尽管样本量小限制了结果的普遍性,并强调了进一步进行前瞻性评估的必要性。