• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右心室造影术提高了无导线起搏器在右室中隔植入的准确性。

Right ventriculography improves the accuracy of leadless pacemaker implantation in right ventricular mid-septum.

机构信息

Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, No.137, South Liyushan Road, Xinshi Zone, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.

Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Remodeling, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;66(4):941-949. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01399-3. Epub 2022 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10840-022-01399-3
PMID:36282369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10173092/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implanting leadless pacemakers in the right ventricular (RV) apex is prone to causing pericardial tamponade and myocardial perforation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and safety of right ventriculography-guided implantation of Micra™ leadless pacemaker (Micra™, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in the RV mid-septum.

METHODS

One hundred eight consecutive patients who underwent Micra™ implantation intended in the mid-septum were enrolled and randomized (3:1) into the radiography group (n = 81) with assistance of right ventriculography to illustrate the RV septum and the non-radiography group (n = 27). All subjects underwent a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan to determine the Micra™ location. The Micra™ location assessed by CT image was compared between the two groups to confirm the accuracy of the intended pacing site. The duration of the procedure, X-ray radiation dose, and time were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Reconstructed CT 3-D cardiac images found the Micra™ location in the intended mid-septum in 13 patients (48.1%, 13/27) in the non-radiography group and 76 patients (93.8%, 76/81) in the radiography group (P < 0.0001 between two groups). There was no significant difference in procedure interval between the two groups while the X-ray radiation dose (564.86 ± 112.44 vs. 825.85 ± 156.12 mGy, P < 0.0001), X-ray exposure time (7.79 ± 1.43 vs. 12.03 ± 2.86 min, P < 0.0001), and the number of fluoroscopy re-positioning (2.79 ± 1.03 vs. 6.41 ± 1.82, P < 0.0001) were significantly less in the radiography group than in the non-radiography group. No implantation-related complications were observed in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Right ventriculography increases the accuracy of Micra™ implantation in the mid-septum and reduces X-ray exposure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial registration number (ChiCTR2100051374) and date (09/22/2021).

摘要

背景

在右心室(RV)心尖植入无导线起搏器容易导致心包填塞和心肌穿孔。

目的

探讨在右心室中隔行右心室造影引导植入 Micra™无导线起搏器(Micra™,美敦力,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)的可行性和安全性。

方法

连续纳入 108 例拟在中隔植入 Micra™的患者,随机(3:1)分为造影组(n = 81)和非造影组(n = 27),造影组通过右心室造影显示 RV 中隔和非造影组。所有患者术后均行 CT 扫描确定 Micra™位置。比较两组 CT 图像评估的 Micra™位置,以确认目标起搏部位的准确性。比较两组手术时间、X 线辐射剂量和时间。

结果

非造影组 27 例患者中有 13 例(48.1%,13/27)在右心室造影组中重建 CT 三维心脏图像发现 Micra™位于预期的中隔,81 例患者(93.8%,76/81)在右心室造影组(两组间 P < 0.0001)。两组手术间隔无显著性差异,而 X 线辐射剂量(564.86 ± 112.44 比 825.85 ± 156.12 mGy,P < 0.0001)、X 线曝光时间(7.79 ± 1.43 比 12.03 ± 2.86 min,P < 0.0001)和透视重定位次数(2.79 ± 1.03 比 6.41 ± 1.82,P < 0.0001)明显少于非造影组。两组均未见与植入相关的并发症。

结论

右心室造影可提高 Micra™在中隔植入的准确性,并减少 X 线暴露。

试验注册

试验注册号(ChiCTR2100051374)和日期(09/22/2021)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/5a0d8d96e94d/10840_2022_1399_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/f1cd0cc9c081/10840_2022_1399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/7370cd24a436/10840_2022_1399_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/bf8d7e36e4bb/10840_2022_1399_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/5a0d8d96e94d/10840_2022_1399_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/f1cd0cc9c081/10840_2022_1399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/7370cd24a436/10840_2022_1399_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/bf8d7e36e4bb/10840_2022_1399_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcd/10173092/5a0d8d96e94d/10840_2022_1399_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Right ventriculography improves the accuracy of leadless pacemaker implantation in right ventricular mid-septum.右心室造影术提高了无导线起搏器在右室中隔植入的准确性。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Jun;66(4):941-949. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01399-3. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
2
Leadless pacemaker for patients following cardiac valve intervention.无导线起搏器用于心脏瓣膜介入治疗后的患者。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Dec;113(12):772-779. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
3
Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiopulmonary Arrest Following Micra™ Leadless Pacemaker Implantation.Micra™无导线起搏器植入后发生心室颤动致心搏骤停
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2021 Nov 15;12(11):4756-4760. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2021.121102. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Leadless cardiac pacing: Results from a large single-centre experience.无导线心脏起搏:一项大型单中心经验的结果。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Jun-Jul;116(6-7):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
Implant efficiency and clinical performance of Aveir™ VR and Micra™ VR leadless pacemaker: A multicenter comparative analysis of 67 patients.Aveir™ VR 和 Micra™ VR 无导线起搏器的植入效率和临床性能:67 例患者的多中心对比分析。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;46(8):827-832. doi: 10.1111/pace.14766. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
6
Leadless pacemaker implantation via the internal jugular vein.经颈内静脉植入无导线起搏器。
Europace. 2024 Aug 3;26(8). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae199.
7
Safety and feasibility of a midseptal implantation technique of a leadless pacemaker.无导线起搏器经中隔植入技术的安全性和可行性。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Jun;16(6):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
8
Leadless pacemaker implantation sites confirmed by computed tomography and their parameters and complication rates.无导线起搏器植入部位的 CT 确认及其参数和并发症发生率。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Feb;45(2):196-203. doi: 10.1111/pace.14437. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
9
Validation of conventional fluoroscopic and ECG criteria for right ventricular pacemaker lead position using cardiac computed tomography.使用心脏计算机断层扫描验证右心室起搏器导线位置的传统透视和心电图标准
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;37(4):495-504. doi: 10.1111/pace.12301. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
10
Initial studies on the implanting sites of high and low ventricular septa using leadless cardiac pacemakers.使用无导线心脏起搏器对高位和低位室间隔植入部位的初步研究。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023 Jul;28(4):e13068. doi: 10.1111/anec.13068. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Leadless pacing in young patients.年轻患者的无导线起搏
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Mar 24;27(Suppl 2):ii14-ii20. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae090. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes between Leadless and Conventional Transvenous Pacemakers Implantation: An Up-to-Date Meta-analysis.无导线起搏器与传统经静脉起搏器植入术后结局的比较:一项最新的荟萃分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 9;25(10):359. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2510359. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Right ventriculography to guide left bundle branch pacing in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: a novel case report.

本文引用的文献

1
Major adverse clinical events associated with implantation of a leadless intracardiac pacemaker.与植入无导线心脏起搏器相关的主要不良临床事件。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jul;18(7):1132-1139. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in pacemaker-dependent patients is lower with leadless pacemakers compared to transvenous pacemakers.与经静脉起搏器相比,无导线起搏器用于依赖起搏器的患者时,起搏诱导性心肌病的发生率较低。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):477-483. doi: 10.1111/jce.14814. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
3
Assessing safety of leadless pacemaker (MICRA) at various implantation sites and its impact on paced QRS in Indian population.
右心室造影术指导起搏诱导性心肌病中的左束支起搏:一例新病例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024 Sep 24;8(10):ytae494. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae494. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Comparison of Safety of Leadless Pacemakers and Transvenous Pacemakers: A Meta-Analysis.无导线起搏器与经静脉起搏器安全性的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 12;15(9):e45086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45086. eCollection 2023 Sep.
评估无导线起搏器 (MICRA) 在不同植入部位的安全性及其对印度人群起搏 QRS 的影响。
Indian Heart J. 2020 Sep-Oct;72(5):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
4
Simplifying Physiological Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using a New Nine-Partition Method.使用一种新的九分区法简化生理性左束支区域起搏
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Feb;37(2):329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.05.011. Epub 2020 May 16.
5
Using Medicare Claims to Identify Acute Clinical Events Following Implantation of Leadless Pacemakers.利用医疗保险理赔数据识别无导线起搏器植入后的急性临床事件。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2020 Feb 28;11:19-26. doi: 10.2147/POR.S240913. eCollection 2020.
6
Intracardiac echocardiography-guided left bundle branch pacing in a patient with tricuspid valve replacement.经心腔内超声心动图引导的三尖瓣置换术后患者左束支起搏
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;30(11):2525-2527. doi: 10.1111/jce.14205. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
How to implant left bundle branch pacing lead in routine clinical practice.如何在常规临床实践中植入左束支起搏导线。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;30(11):2569-2577. doi: 10.1111/jce.14190. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
8
Leadless pacing with Micra TPS: A comparison between right ventricular outflow tract, mid-septal, and apical implant sites.采用Micra TPS进行无导线起搏:右心室流出道、室间隔中部和心尖植入部位的比较。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Oct;30(10):2002-2011. doi: 10.1111/jce.14083. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
Safety and feasibility of a midseptal implantation technique of a leadless pacemaker.无导线起搏器经中隔植入技术的安全性和可行性。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Jun;16(6):896-902. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
10
Comparison of electrocardiogram characteristics and pacing parameters between left bundle branch pacing and right ventricular pacing in patients receiving pacemaker therapy.比较接受起搏器治疗的患者中左束支起搏与右心室起搏的心电图特征和起搏参数。
Europace. 2019 Apr 1;21(4):673-680. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy252.