Suppr超能文献

二甲双胍单药治疗 2 型糖尿病后附加药物的趋势。

Trends in add-on medications following metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Centers for High-Value Health Care and Value-Based Pharmacy Initiatives, UPMC Health Plan, Pittsburgh, PA.

Evernorth, St Louis, MO.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Nov;28(11):1253-1259. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.11.1253.

Abstract

Although metformin is generally universally recommended as a first-line pharmacologic therapy for most people living with type 2 diabetes, second-line and third-line choices can require a tailored approach to achieve optimal blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels. To examine national trends in second- and third-line antihyperglycemic medications following metformin monotherapy, comparing 2015 and 2019. This retrospective cohort analysis of deidentified pharmacy claims from a large national pharmacy benefits manager from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, and again in January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) continuously enrolled in commercial or Medicare insurance plans who filled an index metformin prescription in either year. Proportions of patients by second-line and third-line antihyperglycemic class were calculated. Second-line use of sulfonylureas (-10.1%; < 0.001), combination drugs (-3.0%; < 0.001), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (-2.0%; = 0.031) significantly declined, whereas second-line use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) (+4.9%; < 0.001) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ras) (+10.0%; < 0.001) significantly increased. Similarly, third-line use of sulfonylureas declined (-5.5%; = 0.005), whereas third-line use of SGLT2is (+3.4%; = 0.005) and GLP-1RAs (+8.3%; < 0.001) increased. Similar trends between 2015 and 2019 were found in commercial and Medicare subgroups. Among all groups in 2015 compared with 2019, sulfonylureas were the most prescribed second-line class and insulins the most common third-line class. Although SGLT2i and GLP-1RA together represented more than one-third of second-line and third-line prescriptions for commercially insured patients in 2019 (34.3% and 35.0%, respectively), these classes were less frequently prescribed in the Medicare subgroup (18% and 25.6%, respectively). This report provides updated second-line and third-line antihyperglycemic medication prescribing trends in the United States, which suggests that evidence-based guidelines are being used in practice to prevent complications and individualize diabetes care. Ms Swart and Drs Peasah and Good are employed by UPMC Health Plan. Dr Neilson was employed by UPMC Health Plan at the time of the study. Drs Munshi and Henderson were employed by Evernorth at the time of the study.

摘要

尽管二甲双胍通常被普遍推荐为大多数 2 型糖尿病患者的一线药物治疗,但二线和三线选择可能需要采用个性化方法来实现最佳血糖和糖化血红蛋白水平。本研究旨在考察二甲双胍单药治疗后,2015 年和 2019 年二线和三线抗高血糖药物的国家趋势。这是一项回顾性队列分析,使用了一家大型全国性药房福利管理公司从 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日和 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日的匿名药房索赔数据,纳入了连续参加商业或医疗保险计划且在上述两年中均有开具二甲双胍处方的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)。计算了二线和三线抗高血糖药物类别的患者比例。二线使用磺酰脲类药物(-10.1%;<0.001)、联合药物(-3.0%;<0.001)和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(-2.0%;=0.031)显著下降,而钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)(+4.9%;<0.001)和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1Ras)(+10.0%;<0.001)的二线使用显著增加。同样,二线使用磺酰脲类药物的比例下降(-5.5%;=0.005),而三线使用 SGLT2i(+3.4%;=0.005)和 GLP-1RAs(+8.3%;<0.001)的比例增加。在商业保险和医疗保险亚组中也发现了 2015 年至 2019 年之间的相似趋势。与 2019 年相比,2015 年所有组中磺酰脲类药物是最常开的二线药物类别,胰岛素是最常用的三线药物类别。尽管 2019 年 SGLT2i 和 GLP-1RA 联合使用占商业保险患者二线和三线处方的三分之一以上(分别为 34.3%和 35.0%),但这些药物类别在医疗保险亚组中的使用频率较低(分别为 18%和 25.6%)。本报告提供了美国二线和三线抗高血糖药物处方的最新趋势,这表明在实践中正在使用循证指南来预防并发症并实现个体化的糖尿病护理。Swart 女士、Peasah 博士和 Good 博士受雇于 UPMC 健康计划。Nielsen 博士在研究期间受雇于 UPMC 健康计划。Munshi 博士和 Henderson 博士在研究期间受雇于 Evernorth。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
11. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: .11. 微血管并发症和足部护理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S151-S167. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S011.
8
Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.达格列净治疗慢性肾脏病患者。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1436-1446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
9
Cardiovascular Outcomes with Ertugliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes.在 2 型糖尿病患者中使用依格列净的心血管结局。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1425-1435. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004967. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验