Laboratory of Physiomechanics of Locomotion, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Italy.
newMediLab, via D. Lazzeretti 7/a, 58100 Grosseto, Italy.
J Biomech. 2022 Nov;144:111345. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111345. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
Rocker-profile design shoes are commonly used in clinical settings. Such footwear reduces in-shoe pressure over the forefoot area during the gait, and depending on the rocker-profile type (i.e., toe-only, heel negative, or double rocker), affects lower limb kinematics, kinetics, and muscle electromyographic activity. However, whether wearing rocker-profile shoes influence the dynamics of the body centre of mass (BCoM) is unknown. We used a mathematical procedure combining Lissajous contours and Fourier analysis to describe the 3D trajectory of the BCoM in walking with rocker-profile (RollingSole) and flat (Control) shoes at 0.97, 1.25, and 1.53 m s in 30 participants. Harmonics amplitude and phase were compared using linear and circular statistics, respectively. External (W), kinematic internal (W) and total (W) mechanical works, and the mechanical energy fraction recovered from a pendular exchange of potential and kinetic energy were also calculated. RollingSole shoes yielded greater W (1-9 %; P < 0.05) and fractional pendular energy exchange (1-8 %; P < 0.01), with lower W (2-5 %; P < 0.05) and unchanged W (P ≥ 0.30). RollingSole shoes led also to a greater mean height of the BCoM (1-3 %; P < 0.01), and amplitude of the anteroposterior and vertical symmetric, and mediolateral 2nd-to-5th harmonics (1-30 %; P < 0.01). No differences between shoes were found for the harmonics phase (P ≥ 0.14). Our results indicate that RollingSole shoes enhanced an inverted pendulum-like behaviour of the BCoM during walking with no alterations in total mechanical work. This may result from the combination of rocker-profile design and greater BCoM height (through thicker soles) with such shoes, increasing recovery of mechanical energy in step-to-step transitions and mid-stance.
蹬地式设计鞋在临床中广泛应用。这种鞋可减少前足区域的鞋内压力,蹬地式设计鞋的种类(仅前掌、后掌负跟、双蹬地式)不同,会影响下肢运动学、动力学和肌肉肌电图活动。但是,穿着蹬地式设计鞋是否会影响身体质心(BCoM)的动力学尚不清楚。我们采用一种数学程序,结合利萨如曲线和傅里叶分析,描述 30 名参与者在 0.97、1.25 和 1.53m/s 速度下,穿着蹬地式(RollingSole)和平底(Control)鞋行走时 BCoM 的 3D 轨迹。采用线性和圆形统计学分别比较谐波振幅和相位。还计算了外部(W)、运动学内部(W)和总(W)机械功,以及从势能和动能的摆动交换中恢复的机械能量分数。RollingSole 鞋的 W(1-9%;P<0.05)和分数摆动能量交换(1-8%;P<0.01)更大,W(2-5%;P<0.05)和 W 不变(P≥0.30)。RollingSole 鞋还导致 BCoM 的平均高度更大(1-3%;P<0.01),以及前-后和垂直对称,以及中-侧 2 至 5 次谐波的振幅更大(1-30%;P<0.01)。两种鞋之间的谐波相位没有差异(P≥0.14)。我们的结果表明,RollingSole 鞋在行走时增强了 BCoM 类似倒立摆的行为,而总机械功没有变化。这可能是由于这种鞋的蹬地式设计和更大的 BCoM 高度(通过更厚的鞋底)的组合,增加了在步与步之间的转换和中步时机械能的恢复。