McLean Courtney P, Lavale Alexandra, Kulkarni Jayashri, Sharp Gemma
Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Body Image. 2022 Dec;43:374-384. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
The psychometric properties of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) have been widely reported, but there remains considerable uncertainty regarding the factor structure of the tool, with vegetarians and vegans remaining no exception. Due to the utility of the EDE-Q as a screening and outcome measure, we assessed the theoretical assumptions and psychometric properties of the EDE-Q in vegetarians (n = 278), vegans (n = 580), and omnivores (n = 413) separately, owing to the expectation of different structures within each dietary population given their varying degrees of restraint. We undertook confirmatory factor analysis of five models previously described demonstrating inadequate fit. Exploratory factor analysis supported unique three-factor models across dietary groups incorporating Weight and Shape Concern subscales, potentially suggesting that community samples of varying of dietary restraint consistently interpret weight/shape to be related to general body image concerns. These novel findings also suggest a shorter version of the EDE-Q may be more suitable in community samples to reduce the time burden of the tool. The predominately poor test-retest reliability raises doubt around the overall utility and stability of the EDE-Q in all dietary populations, regardless of whether a shortened version is employed. Future research is needed to validate of other eating disorder tools across dietary populations.
饮食失调检查问卷(EDE-Q)的心理测量特性已有广泛报道,但该工具的因子结构仍存在相当大的不确定性,素食者和纯素食者也不例外。鉴于EDE-Q作为筛查和结果测量工具的实用性,我们分别评估了素食者(n = 278)、纯素食者(n = 580)和杂食者(n = 413)中EDE-Q的理论假设和心理测量特性,因为考虑到每个饮食群体因其不同程度的节制而可能具有不同的结构。我们对先前描述的五个模型进行了验证性因子分析,结果显示拟合不佳。探索性因子分析支持了跨饮食群体的独特三因子模型,该模型纳入了体重和体型关注子量表,这可能表明不同饮食节制程度的社区样本一致认为体重/体型与总体身体形象关注相关。这些新发现还表明,EDE-Q的较短版本可能更适合社区样本,以减轻该工具的时间负担。无论是否采用缩短版,EDE-Q在所有饮食群体中的重测信度普遍较差,这引发了人们对其整体效用和稳定性的质疑。未来需要开展研究,以验证其他饮食失调工具在不同饮食群体中的有效性。