Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 15;321:114-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.023. Epub 2022 Oct 23.
Worldwide, approximately 800,000 people die by suicide every year, and non-fatal suicidal thoughts and behaviours are common. Stigma is likely a major barrier to preventing suicide. The purpose of our review is to scope the development, psychometric properties and use of measures that explicitly seek to measure the construct of suicide stigma.
We conducted a scoping review. We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL using search terms related to suicide, stigma and measures/scales with no date limits. We included any measure the authors defined as measuring suicide-related stigma. Only peer-reviewed articles published in English were included.
We included 106 papers discussing 23 measures of suicide stigma; 82 provided data on psychometric properties. Measures assessed personal or public stigma; and stigma toward a range of suicidal phenomena (e.g., suicidal thoughts, those bereaved by suicide). 'Stigma' definitions varied and were not always provided. The Grief Experience Questionnaire, Suicide Opinion Questionnaire and Stigma of Suicide Scale were the most commonly cited. Measures varied in the strength of their psychometric properties.
We only included papers in English. Because we included any measures authors defined as measuring suicide stigma, we may have included measures not commonly considered as measures of suicide stigma, and conversely we might have excluded relevant measures because they did not use the term 'stigma'.
This review aimed to assist in better understanding available suicide stigma measures, their strengths and weaknesses and current uses, and will inform the development of future suicide stigma measures.
全球每年约有 80 万人自杀身亡,非致命性自杀念头和行为较为常见。耻辱感可能是预防自杀的主要障碍。我们的综述旨在明确评估旨在衡量自杀耻辱感这一概念的发展、心理计量特性和应用。
我们进行了范围界定审查。我们使用与自杀、耻辱和措施/量表相关的搜索词,在 PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase 和 CINAHL 上进行了无日期限制的搜索。我们纳入了作者定义为衡量与自杀相关的耻辱感的任何措施。仅纳入以英文发表的同行评审文章。
我们纳入了 106 篇讨论 23 项自杀耻辱感措施的论文;82 篇提供了心理计量特性数据。措施评估了个人或公众的耻辱感;以及对一系列自杀现象(例如自杀念头、自杀身亡者的亲友)的耻辱感。“耻辱”的定义各不相同,且并非总是提供。《悲痛体验问卷》《自杀态度问卷》和《自杀耻辱量表》的引用最为广泛。措施在心理计量特性的强度上存在差异。
我们仅纳入了英文论文。由于我们纳入了作者定义为衡量自杀耻辱感的任何措施,我们可能纳入了一些不常被视为自杀耻辱感衡量措施的措施,反之,我们可能因为它们未使用“耻辱”一词而排除了相关措施。
本综述旨在帮助更好地了解现有的自杀耻辱感措施、它们的优缺点和当前用途,并为未来的自杀耻辱感措施的发展提供信息。