• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依帕司他联合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的疗效观察 目的 观察依帕司他联合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床疗效。 方法 将 100 例糖尿病周围神经病变患者随机分为两组,每组 50 例。两组患者均给予糖尿病基础治疗,对照组在基础治疗上加用甲钴胺 500 μg 静脉滴注,1 次/d;观察组在对照组治疗基础上加用依帕司他 50 mg,3 次/d。两组疗程均为 4 周。观察两组患者治疗前后的临床疗效、多伦多临床评分系统(TCSS)评分、神经传导速度(NCV)的变化。 结果 观察组总有效率为 92.0%,对照组为 76.0%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的 TCSS 评分均较治疗前降低(P<0.05),且观察组 TCSS 评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的正中神经、腓总神经的运动神经传导速度(MCV)和感觉神经传导速度(SCV)均较治疗前升高(P<0.05),且观察组的 MCV 和 SCV 高于对照组(P<0.05)。 结论 依帕司他联合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变可有效改善患者的临床症状和神经传导速度,提高临床疗效。 结论:依帕司他联合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变可有效改善患者的临床症状和神经传导速度,提高临床疗效。

Shift in diagnostic classification of migraine after initiation of preventive treatment with eptinezumab: post hoc analysis of the PROMISE studies.

机构信息

Neurology Department, Headache Unit, Vall d'Hebron, University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Department de Medicina, Vall d'Hebron, University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02914-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12883-022-02914-9
PMID:36284281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9594902/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monthly headache frequency directly correlates with personal/societal burden and impacts severity and preventive treatment decisions. This post hoc analysis identified shifts from higher to lower frequency headache categories over 6 months in patients with migraine participating in the PROMISE clinical trials receiving two eptinezumab doses.

METHODS

Headache frequency at baseline and over study months 1-6 was categorized into 4 groups: chronic migraine (CM; ≥ 15 monthly headache days [MHDs]), high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM; 10-14 MHDs), low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM; 4-9 MHDs), and ≤ 3 MHDs. Outcomes included the percentage of patients within each MHD category, the percentage of patients improving by ≥ 1 MHD category, and the number of months with reduction of ≥ 1 MHD category. Data from patients who received approved eptinezumab doses (100 mg or 300 mg) or placebo were included.

RESULTS

Mean headache frequency at baseline in PROMISE-1 was 10 MHDs; most patients were classified as having HFEM (48.6%) or LFEM (43.9%). At Month 1, 62/221 (28.1%), 75/222 (33.8%), and 45/222 (20.3%) patients who received eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo had ≤ 3 MHDs, with 97/221 (43.9%), 108/222 (48.6%), and 84/222 (37.8%), respectively, falling below the diagnostic EM threshold at Month 6. More than one-third (79/221 [35.7%], 83/222 [37.4%], and 68/222 [30.6%] of patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively), had 6 months of reduction of ≥ 1 frequency category. At baseline in PROMISE-2, mean headache frequency was 20.5 MHDs. All patients (100%) in the eptinezumab 100 mg and placebo groups had CM, as did 99.4% of patients receiving eptinezumab 300 mg. At Month 1, 209/356 (58.7%), 216/350 (61.7%), and 167/366 (45.6%) patients treated with eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo had ≤ 14 MHDs, with 240/356 (67.4%), 249/350 (71.1%), and 221/366 (60.4%), respectively, falling below CM threshold at Month 6. Additionally, 153/356 (43.0%), 169/350 (48.3%), and 116/366 (31.7%) patients in the eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, had 6 months of reduction of ≥ 1 frequency category.

CONCLUSION

In the PROMISE studies, episodic and chronic migraine patients treated with eptinezumab were more likely to reduce their headache frequency versus placebo, which directly and in a sustained way improved their diagnostic category classification.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02559895, NCT02974153.

摘要

背景

每月头痛频率与个人/社会负担直接相关,并影响严重程度和预防性治疗决策。本事后分析旨在确定在偏头痛患者中接受依替扎尼布两种剂量治疗的 PROMISE 临床试验中,从更高头痛频率类别向更低头痛频率类别的转变情况。

方法

根据基线和研究第 1-6 个月的头痛频率将患者分为 4 组:慢性偏头痛(CM;≥15 个每月头痛日[MHD])、高频发作性偏头痛(HFEM;10-14 MHD)、低频发作性偏头痛(LFEM;4-9 MHD)和≤3 MHD。主要结局包括每个 MHD 类别的患者比例、≥1 MHD 类别的患者比例改善情况,以及≥1 MHD 类别的月数减少情况。包括接受批准的依替扎尼布剂量(100mg 或 300mg)或安慰剂治疗的患者的数据。

结果

PROMISE-1 研究的平均基线头痛频率为 10 MHD;大多数患者被归类为 HFEM(48.6%)或 LFEM(43.9%)。在第 1 个月,221 例患者中有 62 例(28.1%)、222 例中有 75 例(33.8%)和 222 例中有 45 例(20.3%)接受依替扎尼布 100mg、300mg 和安慰剂治疗,其每月头痛日≤3,分别有 97 例(43.9%)、108 例(48.6%)和 84 例(37.8%)在第 6 个月低于偏头痛的诊断标准。超过三分之一(79 例[35.7%]、83 例[37.4%]和 68 例[30.6%])接受依替扎尼布 100mg、300mg 和安慰剂治疗的患者在 6 个月内头痛频率至少减少了 1 个类别。在 PROMISE-2 研究的基线时,头痛频率为 20.5 MHD。依替扎尼布 100mg 和安慰剂组的所有患者(100%)均患有 CM,依替扎尼布 300mg 组的 99.4%的患者也患有 CM。在第 1 个月,221 例患者中有 209 例(58.7%)、216 例(61.7%)和 167 例(45.6%)接受依替扎尼布 100mg、300mg 和安慰剂治疗,每月头痛日≤14,分别有 240 例(67.4%)、249 例(71.1%)和 221 例(60.4%)在第 6 个月低于 CM 诊断标准。此外,依替扎尼布 100mg、300mg 和安慰剂组分别有 153 例(43.0%)、169 例(48.3%)和 116 例(31.7%)患者在 6 个月内头痛频率至少减少了 1 个类别。

结论

在 PROMISE 研究中,接受依替扎尼布治疗的发作性和慢性偏头痛患者与安慰剂相比,更有可能降低头痛频率,这直接且持续地改善了他们的诊断类别分类。

试验注册

临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT02559895,NCT02974153。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/2bf436c23e8b/12883_2022_2914_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/4fcdbba44d4e/12883_2022_2914_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/9113e60f145f/12883_2022_2914_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/e463a4cc384a/12883_2022_2914_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/2bf436c23e8b/12883_2022_2914_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/4fcdbba44d4e/12883_2022_2914_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/9113e60f145f/12883_2022_2914_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/e463a4cc384a/12883_2022_2914_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa71/9594902/2bf436c23e8b/12883_2022_2914_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Shift in diagnostic classification of migraine after initiation of preventive treatment with eptinezumab: post hoc analysis of the PROMISE studies.依帕司他联合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的疗效观察 目的 观察依帕司他联合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的临床疗效。 方法 将 100 例糖尿病周围神经病变患者随机分为两组,每组 50 例。两组患者均给予糖尿病基础治疗,对照组在基础治疗上加用甲钴胺 500 μg 静脉滴注,1 次/d;观察组在对照组治疗基础上加用依帕司他 50 mg,3 次/d。两组疗程均为 4 周。观察两组患者治疗前后的临床疗效、多伦多临床评分系统(TCSS)评分、神经传导速度(NCV)的变化。 结果 观察组总有效率为 92.0%,对照组为 76.0%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的 TCSS 评分均较治疗前降低(P<0.05),且观察组 TCSS 评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的正中神经、腓总神经的运动神经传导速度(MCV)和感觉神经传导速度(SCV)均较治疗前升高(P<0.05),且观察组的 MCV 和 SCV 高于对照组(P<0.05)。 结论 依帕司他联合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变可有效改善患者的临床症状和神经传导速度,提高临床疗效。 结论:依帕司他联合甲钴胺治疗糖尿病周围神经病变可有效改善患者的临床症状和神经传导速度,提高临床疗效。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02914-9.
2
Preventive migraine treatment with eptinezumab reduced acute headache medication and headache frequency to below diagnostic thresholds in patients with chronic migraine and medication-overuse headache.依替班特预防偏头痛治疗可使慢性偏头痛和药物过度使用性头痛患者的急性头痛药物和头痛发作频率降低至诊断阈值以下。
Headache. 2021 Oct;61(9):1421-1431. doi: 10.1111/head.14206. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
3
Galcanezumab in episodic migraine: subgroup analyses of efficacy by high versus low frequency of migraine headaches in phase 3 studies (EVOLVE-1 & EVOLVE-2).加巴喷丁在发作性偏头痛中的疗效:3 期研究(EVOLVE-1 和 EVOLVE-2)中根据偏头痛发作频率高低的亚组分析。
J Headache Pain. 2019 Jun 28;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x.
4
Improving to Four or Fewer Monthly Headache Days Per Month Provides a Clinically Meaningful Therapeutic Target for Patients with Chronic Migraine.将每月头痛天数改善至每月4天或更少,为慢性偏头痛患者提供了具有临床意义的治疗目标。
Pain Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):1179-1194. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00525-x. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
Quantity changes in acute headache medication use among patients with chronic migraine treated with eptinezumab: subanalysis of the PROMISE-2 study.依替班珠单抗治疗慢性偏头痛患者急性头痛药物使用量的变化:PROMISE-2 研究的亚分析。
J Headache Pain. 2022 Sep 6;23(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01482-0.
6
Shift from high-frequency to low-frequency episodic migraine in patients treated with Galcanezumab: results from two global randomized clinical trials.在接受加奈珠单抗治疗的患者中,从高频阵发性偏头痛转为低频阵发性偏头痛:两项全球随机临床试验结果。
J Headache Pain. 2021 May 28;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01222-w.
7
Early clinical experience with eptinezumab: results of a retrospective observational study of patient response in the United States.依替尼单抗的早期临床经验:美国回顾性观察研究中患者应答的结果。
BMC Neurol. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03204-8.
8
Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with migraine and self-reported aura: Post hoc analysis of PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2.依替唑仑单抗治疗有先兆偏头痛患者的疗效和安全性:PROMISE-1 和 PROMISE-2 的事后分析。
Cephalalgia. 2022 Jul;42(8):696-704. doi: 10.1177/03331024221077646. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients with prior preventive treatment failures: subgroup analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled DELIVER study.依替巴肽治疗偏头痛预防失败患者的疗效和安全性:随机、安慰剂对照 DELIVER 研究的亚组分析。
Cephalalgia. 2023 May;43(5):3331024231170807. doi: 10.1177/03331024231170807.
10
Impact of Baseline Characteristics on the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab in Patients With Migraine: Subgroup Analyses of PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2.基线特征对偏头痛患者中eptinezumab疗效和安全性的影响:PROMISE-1和PROMISE-2的亚组分析
Clin Ther. 2022 Mar;44(3):389-402. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-efficacy evaluation of a mindfulness-based program added to treatment as usual for the treatment of chronic migraine associated to medication overuse headache.在常规治疗基础上加用正念疗法对药物过量使用性头痛相关慢性偏头痛进行治疗的成本效益评估。
Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08327-z.
2
Eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine: a narrative review.艾普替奈umab用于发作性和慢性偏头痛的预防性治疗:一项叙述性综述
Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 8;15:1355877. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1355877. eCollection 2024.
3
Risk factors for migraine disease progression: a narrative review for a patient-centered approach.

本文引用的文献

1
European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update.欧洲头痛联合会关于使用靶向降钙素基因相关肽通路的单克隆抗体预防偏头痛的指南-2022 更新版。
J Headache Pain. 2022 Jun 11;23(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x.
2
Measuring dose-related efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention: post hoc analysis of PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2.评估依替替班治疗偏头痛预防的剂量相关性疗效:PROMISE-1 和 PROMISE-2 的事后分析。
J Headache Pain. 2022 Apr 18;23(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01418-8.
3
Reduction in migraine-associated burden after eptinezumab treatment in patients with chronic migraine.
偏头痛疾病进展的风险因素:以患者为中心的方法进行叙述性综述。
J Neurol. 2023 Dec;270(12):5692-5710. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11880-2. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
依替替班治疗慢性偏头痛患者偏头痛相关负担的降低。
Cephalalgia. 2022 Sep;42(10):1005-1012. doi: 10.1177/03331024221089567. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Early response to eptinezumab indicates high likelihood of continued response in patients with chronic migraine.依替班珠单抗早期应答预示慢性偏头痛患者持续应答的可能性较高。
J Headache Pain. 2022 Feb 21;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01387-y.
5
Impact of Baseline Characteristics on the Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab in Patients With Migraine: Subgroup Analyses of PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2.基线特征对偏头痛患者中eptinezumab疗效和安全性的影响:PROMISE-1和PROMISE-2的亚组分析
Clin Ther. 2022 Mar;44(3):389-402. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
6
Epidemiology, work and economic impact of migraine in a large hospital cohort: time to raise awareness and promote sustainability.偏头痛在大型医院队列中的流行病学、工作和经济影响:是时候提高认识和促进可持续性了。
J Neurol. 2022 Mar;269(3):1456-1462. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10715-2. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
7
The American Headache Society Consensus Statement: Update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice.美国头痛学会共识声明:更新将新的偏头痛治疗方法整合到临床实践中的建议。
Headache. 2021 Jul;61(7):1021-1039. doi: 10.1111/head.14153. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
8
Effects of Intravenous Eptinezumab vs Placebo on Headache Pain and Most Bothersome Symptom When Initiated During a Migraine Attack: A Randomized Clinical Trial.静脉注射eptinezumab与安慰剂对偏头痛发作期间开始用药时头痛疼痛及最困扰症状的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2021 Jun 15;325(23):2348-2356. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7665.
9
Chronic versus episodic migraine: The 15-day threshold does not adequately reflect substantial differences in disability across the full spectrum of headache frequency.慢性偏头痛与发作性偏头痛:15 天的阈值并不能充分反映在整个头痛频率范围内,残疾程度存在显著差异。
Headache. 2021 Jul;61(7):992-1003. doi: 10.1111/head.14154. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
Impact of monthly headache days on anxiety, depression and disability in migraine patients: results from the Spanish Atlas.每月头痛天数对偏头痛患者焦虑、抑郁和残疾的影响:来自西班牙地图集的结果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87352-2.