• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手法针刺或联合康复治疗中风后吞咽困难:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Manual Acupuncture or Combination of Rehabilitation Therapy to Treat Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Jiang Hailun, Zhang Qiang, Zhao Qi, Chen Hao, Nan Xi, Liu Miao, Yin Chunsheng, Liu Wei, Fan Xiaonong, Meng Zhihong, Du Yuzheng

机构信息

First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China.

Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Oct 15;2022:8803507. doi: 10.1155/2022/8803507. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/8803507
PMID:36285156
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9588332/
Abstract

. Poststroke dysphagia is one of the most common stroke complications with high morbidity and long course, while acupuncture treatment is easily accepted by patients due to its reliability, feasibility, simple operation, low price, and quick effect. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of manual acupuncture in poststroke dysphagia patients. . Databases including Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, EMBASE, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), WanFang (WanFang Database), and VIP (Chongqing VIP) were searched from inception until Aug 19, 2022. Data were analyzed using Revman 5.3, Stata 14.0, and TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta software. Evidence quality evaluation was performed by using GRADE profiler 3.6. . A total of 33 randomized control trials (RCTs) enrolled 2680 patients. Meta-analysis results revealed that compared to rehabilitation, acupuncture decreased water swallow test (WST) and standard swallowing assessment (SSA) scores. Meanwhile, in contrast to rehabilitation alone, integration of acupuncture with rehabilitation effectively decreased WST and SSA scores; improved swallowing scores of videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), swallowing scores of Fujishima Ichiro, Barthel index (BI), and swallowing quality of life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL); reduced the aspiration rates as well as aspiration pneumonia; and shortened the duration of empty swallowing and the duration of 5 mL water swallowing. Pooled analysis did not reveal any significant differences in dysphagia outcome severity scores (DOSS) (=0.15 > 0.05) between the acupuncture group combined with rehabilitation group and the rehabilitation group alone. After the risk-of-bias assessment, these studies were not of low quality, except in terms of allocation concealment and blindness. Evidence quality evaluation showed that allocation concealment and blindness led to a downgrade and primary outcomes' evaluation of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation were ranked as moderate-quality evidence while acupuncture alone was ranked as low-quality. . This meta-analysis provided positive pieces of evidences that acupuncture and acupuncture combined with rehabilitation were better than using rehabilitation alone in the treatment of poststroke dysphagia.

摘要

脑卒中后吞咽困难是最常见的脑卒中并发症之一,发病率高且病程长,而针灸治疗因其可靠性、可行性、操作简单、价格低廉且疗效迅速而容易被患者接受。我们的目的是评估手针治疗脑卒中后吞咽困难患者的疗效。检索了包括Medline、Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆数据库、EMBASE、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库和维普数据库(VIP)在内的数据库,检索时间从建库至2022年8月19日。使用Revman 5.3、Stata 14.0和TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta软件进行数据分析。采用GRADE profiler 3.6进行证据质量评估。共有33项随机对照试验(RCT)纳入了2680例患者。荟萃分析结果显示,与康复治疗相比,针灸降低了水吞咽试验(WST)和标准吞咽评估(SSA)评分。同时,与单纯康复治疗相比,针灸与康复治疗相结合有效降低了WST和SSA评分;提高了电视荧光吞咽造影检查(VFSS)的吞咽评分、藤岛一郎吞咽评分、巴氏指数(BI)以及吞咽生活质量问卷(SWAL-QOL);降低了误吸率以及误吸性肺炎;缩短了空吞咽持续时间和5毫升水吞咽持续时间。汇总分析未显示针灸联合康复治疗组与单纯康复治疗组在吞咽困难结局严重程度评分(DOSS)方面有任何显著差异(=0.15>0.05)。在进行偏倚风险评估后,除分配隐藏和盲法方面外,这些研究质量并不低。证据质量评估表明,分配隐藏和盲法导致证据降级,针灸联合康复治疗的主要结局评估被列为中等质量证据,而单纯针灸则被列为低质量证据。这项荟萃分析提供了积极的证据,表明针灸以及针灸与康复治疗相结合在治疗脑卒中后吞咽困难方面优于单纯使用康复治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/1ca55b0812b9/ECAM2022-8803507.025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/aee4de55635a/ECAM2022-8803507.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/a1f432463006/ECAM2022-8803507.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/db9d7dffd3c5/ECAM2022-8803507.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/ce60434e74be/ECAM2022-8803507.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/27e14cd0cc81/ECAM2022-8803507.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/71c109b15e42/ECAM2022-8803507.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/eece02760ab8/ECAM2022-8803507.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/419cca650478/ECAM2022-8803507.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/863a90cdac67/ECAM2022-8803507.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/646866cddef5/ECAM2022-8803507.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/8d82931e991f/ECAM2022-8803507.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/cbd0106148fd/ECAM2022-8803507.012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/c93f062c8759/ECAM2022-8803507.013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/54eabf5a78e0/ECAM2022-8803507.014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/8cdb835c8106/ECAM2022-8803507.015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/424be619927c/ECAM2022-8803507.016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/89cc0b76060e/ECAM2022-8803507.017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/ee97fdc91c93/ECAM2022-8803507.018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/f1ba68549d87/ECAM2022-8803507.019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/5c81b4d04d3f/ECAM2022-8803507.020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/63862d15c4dc/ECAM2022-8803507.021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/236e58946ab5/ECAM2022-8803507.022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/43fdc93077c0/ECAM2022-8803507.023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/fecfd9352408/ECAM2022-8803507.024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/1ca55b0812b9/ECAM2022-8803507.025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/aee4de55635a/ECAM2022-8803507.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/a1f432463006/ECAM2022-8803507.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/db9d7dffd3c5/ECAM2022-8803507.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/ce60434e74be/ECAM2022-8803507.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/27e14cd0cc81/ECAM2022-8803507.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/71c109b15e42/ECAM2022-8803507.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/eece02760ab8/ECAM2022-8803507.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/419cca650478/ECAM2022-8803507.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/863a90cdac67/ECAM2022-8803507.009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/646866cddef5/ECAM2022-8803507.010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/8d82931e991f/ECAM2022-8803507.011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/cbd0106148fd/ECAM2022-8803507.012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/c93f062c8759/ECAM2022-8803507.013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/54eabf5a78e0/ECAM2022-8803507.014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/8cdb835c8106/ECAM2022-8803507.015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/424be619927c/ECAM2022-8803507.016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/89cc0b76060e/ECAM2022-8803507.017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/ee97fdc91c93/ECAM2022-8803507.018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/f1ba68549d87/ECAM2022-8803507.019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/5c81b4d04d3f/ECAM2022-8803507.020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/63862d15c4dc/ECAM2022-8803507.021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/236e58946ab5/ECAM2022-8803507.022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/43fdc93077c0/ECAM2022-8803507.023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/fecfd9352408/ECAM2022-8803507.024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/542c/9588332/1ca55b0812b9/ECAM2022-8803507.025.jpg

相似文献

1
Manual Acupuncture or Combination of Rehabilitation Therapy to Treat Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.手法针刺或联合康复治疗中风后吞咽困难:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Oct 15;2022:8803507. doi: 10.1155/2022/8803507. eCollection 2022.
2
Clinical Effects and Safety of Electroacupuncture for the Treatment of Poststroke Dysphagia: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电针治疗中风后吞咽困难的临床疗效与安全性:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Sep 26;2020:1560978. doi: 10.1155/2020/1560978. eCollection 2020.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture in aspiration caused by post-stroke dysphagia.针刺治疗中风后吞咽困难所致误吸的系统评价与Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 10;15:1305056. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1305056. eCollection 2024.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of acupuncture in Parkinson's disease with dysphagia.针刺治疗帕金森病吞咽困难的系统评价与Meta分析
Front Neurol. 2023 May 26;14:1099012. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1099012. eCollection 2023.
5
The Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Dysphagia after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针刺治疗中风后吞咽困难的有效性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 Jan 19;2021:8837625. doi: 10.1155/2021/8837625. eCollection 2021.
6
A meta-analysis of the effect of nape acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training in the treatment of dysphagia after stroke.一项关于项针结合康复训练治疗中风后吞咽障碍的效果的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Nov 18;101(46):e31906. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031906.
7
Acupuncture combined with swallowing training for poststroke dysphagia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.针刺结合吞咽训练治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的 Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究。
Acupunct Med. 2019 Apr;37(2):81-90. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2016-011305. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
Efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training for poststroke cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.针灸结合康复训练治疗脑卒中后认知障碍的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023 Sep;32(9):107231. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107231. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
9
Acupuncture treatment vs. cognitive rehabilitation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.针刺治疗与认知康复对中风后认知障碍的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1035125. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1035125. eCollection 2023.
10
Pharyngeal Cavity Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Swallowing for Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.基于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析:咽腔电刺激辅助治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍。
Dysphagia. 2024 Aug;39(4):541-551. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10644-4. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on the Swallowing Function of Patients With Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.非药物干预对脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者吞咽功能的影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 Jan;52(1):109-120. doi: 10.1111/joor.13901. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Current state of research on acupuncture for the treatment of post-stroke dysphagia: a scoping review.针刺治疗中风后吞咽困难的研究现状:一项范围综述
Front Neurosci. 2024 Aug 15;18:1391576. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1391576. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
[Scalp-nape acupuncture as adjuvant therapy for pharyngeal dysphagia of stroke at recovery stage: a randomized controlled trial].[头项部针刺作为中风恢复期吞咽困难的辅助治疗:一项随机对照试验]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2022 May 12;42(5):481-5. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210620-k0003.
2
Identifying Dose Components of Manual Acupuncture to Determine the Dose-Response Relationship of Acupuncture Treatment: A Systematic Review.确定手动针刺的剂量成分以确定针刺治疗的剂量反应关系:系统评价。
Am J Chin Med. 2022;50(3):653-671. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X22500264. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
3
[Effect of nape cluster acupuncture on swallowing function and respiratory function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia].
项丛刺对脑卒中后吞咽功能及呼吸功能的影响
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2021 Dec 12;41(12):1303-7. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20201110-k0002.
4
European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Swallowing Disorders guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of post-stroke dysphagia.欧洲卒中组织和欧洲吞咽障碍学会关于卒中后吞咽困难诊断和治疗的指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Sep;6(3):LXXXIX-CXV. doi: 10.1177/23969873211039721. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
[Clinical trials of needling combined with respiratory training for post-stroke dysphagia].针刺结合呼吸训练治疗脑卒中后吞咽困难的临床试验
Zhen Ci Yan Jiu. 2021 Oct 25;46(10):875-9. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.201011.
6
Critical Period After Stroke Study (CPASS): A phase II clinical trial testing an optimal time for motor recovery after stroke in humans.中风后关键期研究(CPASS):一项二期临床试验,旨在探索人类中风后运动康复的最佳时间。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 28;118(39). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026676118.
7
Neuroplasticity of Acupuncture for Stroke: An Evidence-Based Review of MRI.针刺治疗中风的神经可塑性:基于 MRI 的证据回顾。
Neural Plast. 2021 Aug 19;2021:2662585. doi: 10.1155/2021/2662585. eCollection 2021.
8
Studying effects of neuromuscular electrostimulation therapy in patients with dysphagia: which pitfalls may occur? A translational phase I study.研究神经肌肉电刺激疗法对吞咽困难患者的影响:可能会出现哪些陷阱?一项转化的 I 期研究。
Ger Med Sci. 2021 Jun 1;19:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/000294. eCollection 2021.
9
Electrical, taste, and temperature stimulation in patients with chronic dysphagia after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial.脑卒中后慢性吞咽障碍患者的电、味觉和温度刺激:一项随机对照初步试验。
Acta Neurol Belg. 2021 Oct;121(5):1157-1164. doi: 10.1007/s13760-021-01624-2. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
10
Trends in prevalence of acute stroke impairments: A population-based cohort study using the South London Stroke Register.急性脑卒中损伤流行趋势:一项基于人群队列研究使用南伦敦脑卒中登记处。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 9;17(10):e1003366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003366. eCollection 2020 Oct.