• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿指向言语中陈述句和疑问句的初始韵律差异。

Utterance-Initial Prosodic Differences Between Statements and Questions in Infant-Directed Speech.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Occidental College.

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 2024 Jan;51(1):137-167. doi: 10.1017/S0305000922000460. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1017/S0305000922000460
PMID:36286327
Abstract

Cross-linguistically, statements and questions broadly differ in syntactic organization. To learn the syntactic properties of each sentence type, learners might first rely on non-syntactic information. This paper analyzed prosodic differences between infant-directed -questions and statements to determine what kinds of cues might be available. We predicted there would be a significant difference depending on the first words that appear in -questions (e.g., two closed-class words; meaning words from a category that rarely changes) compared to the variety of first words found in statements. We measured F0, duration, and intensity of the first two words in statements and -questions in naturalistic speech from 13 mother-child dyads in the Brent corpus of the CHILDES database. Results found larger differences between sentence-types when the second word was an open-class not a closed-class word, suggesting a relationship between prosodic and syntactic information in an utterance-initial position that infants may use to make sentence-type distinctions.

摘要

从跨语言的角度来看,陈述句和疑问句在句法结构上有很大的不同。为了学习每种句子类型的句法属性,学习者可能首先依赖于非句法信息。本文分析了婴儿指向的疑问句和陈述句之间的韵律差异,以确定可能存在哪些线索。我们预测,与陈述句中发现的各种首词相比,疑问句中首词(例如,两个封闭类词;来自一个很少变化的类别)会出现显著差异。我们在自然语言环境中测量了儿童发展语料库中的 13 对母子对的陈述和疑问句中前两个词的 F0、时长和强度。结果发现,当第二个词是开放类词而不是封闭类词时,句子类型之间的差异更大,这表明在话语起始位置韵律和句法信息之间存在关系,婴儿可能会利用这种关系来做出句子类型的区分。

相似文献

1
Utterance-Initial Prosodic Differences Between Statements and Questions in Infant-Directed Speech.婴儿指向言语中陈述句和疑问句的初始韵律差异。
J Child Lang. 2024 Jan;51(1):137-167. doi: 10.1017/S0305000922000460. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Prosodic differences between declaratives and interrogatives in infant-directed speech.婴儿导向性言语中陈述句和疑问句的韵律差异。
J Child Lang. 2017 Jul;44(4):968-994. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000349. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Prosody facilitates learning the word order in a new language.韵律有助于学习新语言的语序。
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104686. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104686. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
4
Prosodic input and children's word learning in infant- and adult-directed speech.韵律输入与婴幼儿指向的言语和成人指向的言语中儿童的词汇学习。
Infant Behav Dev. 2022 Aug;68:101728. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101728. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
5
Phrasal prosody constrains syntactic analysis in toddlers.短语韵律限制幼儿的句法分析。
Cognition. 2017 Jun;163:67-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
6
Interaction of prosody and syntax-semantics in Mandarin wh-indeterminates.普通话中疑问不定代词的韵律与句法-语义的相互作用
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Aug;148(2):EL119. doi: 10.1121/10.0001676.
7
Prosody and Function Words Cue the Acquisition of Word Meanings in 18-Month-Old Infants.韵律和功能词提示 18 个月大婴儿习得词义。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):319-332. doi: 10.1177/0956797618814131. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases.当韵律无法提示句法结构时:9个月大婴儿对语音短语和句法短语的敏感性。
Cognition. 1994 Mar;51(3):237-65. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90055-8.
9
Acoustical cues and grammatical units in speech to two preverbal infants.针对两名尚不能言语的婴儿的言语中的声学线索和语法单位。
J Child Lang. 2008 Nov;35(4):869-902. doi: 10.1017/S0305000908008763.
10
Word Segmentation Cues in German Child-Directed Speech: A Corpus Analysis.德语儿童导向言语中的词分割线索:语料库分析。
Lang Speech. 2022 Mar;65(1):3-27. doi: 10.1177/0023830920979016. Epub 2021 Jan 30.