Suppr超能文献

鼻腔气流/阻力(Rn)测量值变化的临床相关因素。

Clinical correlants of changes in nasal flow/resistance (Rn) measurements.

作者信息

Cohen B M

出版信息

Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1978 May-Jun;6(3):217-23.

PMID:362874
Abstract

It has been suggested that changes in nasal airways flow/resistance imply clinical betterment and increased nasal patency, and that patients with congestion sense relief when treatment improves their Rn values by 20% or more, speculations supported by inferences from lower airways dynamics. This hypothesis was tested in a double-blind study of the nasal decongestant potency of phenylpropanolamine/aromatic oil, phenilpropanolamine, aromatic oil and placebo syrups given to 80 patients with common colds who were followed for 6 hours. Rn was determined by electronic posterior rhinometry; patients estimated their degree of nasal congestion with a 6-ranked subjective scale. Statistical techniques included paired and unpaired t-tests, chi-square analysis, analysis of covariance to determine comparisons of within-group differences, differences between drug and placebo groups, and determination of the number in each group improving 20% or more from control Rn. Correlation coefficients relating Rn values to subjective responses were determined by pairing these for each patient and applying standard regression analysis. Despite a strong placebo effect, mean Rn changes ranked the efficacy of the 4 test mixtures, with the 20% improvement criterion allowing the sharpest separation of active mixtures from inactive. In regression analysis the correlation coefficient of 0.56 and the regression slope of 0.66 were both significant (p = 0.01 or better); the latter figure implied that a 1 unit difference on the subjective scale corresponded to a 0.66 unit difference on the Rn scale. With an average objective reading of 3.77 a 1 unit change n the subjective rating perceptible to the subject as a difference in the state of his nasal congestion was equivalent to a mean Rn change of 17.5%. This supports our prior assumption, indicating that a 17.5% to 20% improvement in Rn is experienced as clinical relief. Further, subjective rating scales appear to be statistically sound as a means of assessment of the status of the nasal airways.

摘要

有人提出,鼻气道气流/阻力的变化意味着临床症状改善和鼻通畅度增加,并且当治疗使患者的鼻阻力(Rn)值提高20%或更多时,充血患者会感到缓解,来自下呼吸道动力学的推断支持了这一推测。在一项双盲研究中,对80名感冒患者给予苯丙醇胺/芳香油、苯丙醇胺、芳香油和安慰剂糖浆的鼻减充血效力进行了测试,随访6小时。通过电子后鼻测量法测定Rn;患者用6级主观量表评估其鼻充血程度。统计技术包括配对和非配对t检验、卡方分析、协方差分析,以确定组内差异、药物组与安慰剂组之间的差异比较,以及每组中Rn较对照值提高20%或更多的人数。通过将每个患者的Rn值与主观反应配对并应用标准回归分析,确定Rn值与主观反应之间的相关系数。尽管存在强烈的安慰剂效应,但平均Rn变化对4种测试混合物的疗效进行了排序,20%的改善标准能最清晰地区分活性混合物和非活性混合物。在回归分析中,相关系数0.56和回归斜率0.66均具有显著性(p = 0.01或更好);后一个数字意味着主观量表上1个单位的差异对应于Rn量表上0.66个单位的差异。平均客观读数为3.77时,受试者主观评分上1个单位的变化(可感知为其鼻充血状态的差异)相当于Rn平均变化17.5%。这支持了我们之前的假设,表明Rn提高17.5%至20%会带来临床缓解。此外,主观评分量表作为评估鼻气道状态的一种手段,在统计学上似乎是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验