• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大自行车道舒适度和安全性指标(Can-BICS):用于研究和政策的自行车环境国家测量指标。

The Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety metrics (Can-BICS): National measures of the bicycling environment for use in research and policy.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.

Department of Geography, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec.

出版信息

Health Rep. 2022 Oct 19;33(10):3-13. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202201000001-eng.

DOI:10.25318/82-003-x202201000001-eng
PMID:36287574
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lack of consistent measures of the cycling environment across communities hampers cycling research and policy action. Our goal was to develop the first national dataset in Canada for metrics of the cycling environment at the dissemination area (DA) level - the Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety (Can-BICS) metrics.

DATA AND METHODS

The Can-BICS metrics are area-level metrics based on the quantity of cycling infrastructure within a 1 km buffer of the population-weighted centroid of DAs. The base data are a national cycling network dataset derived from OpenStreetMap (OSM) (extracted January 25, 2022) and classified by high-, medium- and low-comfort facilities. A Can-BICS continuous metric (sum of cycling infrastructure per square kilometre weighted by comfort class) and Can-BICS categorical metric were derived and mapped for all 56,589 DAs in Canada. The Can-BICS metrics were correlated with other national datasets (2016 Canadian Active Living Environments [Can-ALE] and 2016 Census journey-to-work data) to test for associations between Can-BICS and related measures. Additionally, city staff were engaged to provide feedback on metrics during the development phase.

RESULTS

One-third (34%) of neighbourhoods in Canada have no cycling infrastructure. According to the categorical measure, 5% of all DAs were assigned as the highest category of Can-BICS (corresponding to 6% of the population) and were nearly all within metro areas. The Can-BICS continuous metric had low correlation with bike-to-work rates (R = 0.29) and was more strongly correlated with sustainable-transportation-to-work rates (R = 0.56) and the Can-ALE metrics (R=0.62). These correlations were variable across cities.

INTERPRETATION

The Can-BICS metrics provide national research- and practice-ready measures of cycling infrastructure. The metrics complement existing measures of walking and transit environments (Can-ALE), collectively providing a cohesive set of active living measures. The datasets and code are publicly available, facilitating updates as new infrastructure is built.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏社区间一致的骑行环境衡量标准,骑行研究和政策制定工作受到阻碍。我们的目标是在加拿大开发首个国家级数据集,用于衡量传播区域(DA)层面的骑行环境指标,即加拿大自行车道舒适度和安全性(Can-BICS)指标。

数据和方法

Can-BICS 指标是基于 DA 人口加权质心 1 公里缓冲区范围内的骑行基础设施数量的区域层面指标。基础数据是一个源自 OpenStreetMap(OSM)的全国性骑行网络数据集(于 2022 年 1 月 25 日提取),并按高、中、低舒适度设施进行分类。我们得出了 Can-BICS 连续指标(按舒适度级别加权的每平方公里骑行基础设施数量之和)和 Can-BICS 分类指标,并对加拿大所有 56589 个 DA 进行了绘制。我们还将 Can-BICS 指标与其他国家级数据集(2016 年加拿大积极生活环境[Can-ALE]和 2016 年人口普查工作出行数据)进行了相关性分析,以检验 Can-BICS 与相关指标之间的关联。此外,在开发阶段,我们还邀请了城市工作人员就指标提供反馈。

结果

加拿大三分之一(34%)的社区没有骑行基础设施。根据分类指标,5%的 DA 被划分为 Can-BICS 的最高类别(对应 6%的人口),而且几乎都在大都市区内。Can-BICS 连续指标与自行车通勤率的相关性较低(R=0.29),与可持续交通通勤率(R=0.56)和 Can-ALE 指标的相关性更高(R=0.62)。这些相关性在不同城市之间存在差异。

解释

Can-BICS 指标提供了可用于研究和实践的全国性骑行基础设施衡量标准。这些指标补充了现有的步行和公交环境衡量标准(Can-ALE),共同构成了一套连贯的积极生活衡量标准。数据集和代码是公开的,便于随着新基础设施的建设进行更新。

相似文献

1
The Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety metrics (Can-BICS): National measures of the bicycling environment for use in research and policy.加拿大自行车道舒适度和安全性指标(Can-BICS):用于研究和政策的自行车环境国家测量指标。
Health Rep. 2022 Oct 19;33(10):3-13. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202201000001-eng.
2
A pan-Canadian measure of active living environments using open data.利用开放数据进行泛加 拿大积极生活环境的测量。
Health Rep. 2019 May 15;30(5):16-25. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x201900500002-eng.
3
The Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety (Can-BICS) Classification System: A common naming convention for cycling infrastructure.加拿大自行车道舒适度和安全性(Can-BICS)分类系统:一种用于自行车基础设施的通用命名约定。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Sep;40(9):288-293. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.9.04.
4
Bike Score®: Associations between urban bikeability and cycling behavior in 24 cities.自行车评分®:24个城市的城市自行车友好性与骑行行为之间的关联
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Feb 11;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0339-0.
5
Active school transportation and the built environment across Canadian cities: Findings from the child active transportation safety and the environment (CHASE) study.加拿大城市的积极校交通与建筑环境:儿童积极校交通与环境安全研究(CHASE)的结果。
Prev Med. 2021 May;146:106470. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106470. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
6
Correlates of walking and cycling for transport and recreation: factor structure, reliability and behavioural associations of the perceptions of the environment in the neighbourhood scale (PENS).用于交通和娱乐的步行和骑行的相关性:邻里环境感知量表(PENS)的因子结构、可靠性和行为关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Jul 2;10:87. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-87.
7
Application of an evidence-based tool to evaluate health impacts of changes to the built environment.应用基于证据的工具评估建筑环境变化对健康的影响。
Can J Public Health. 2014 Jul 11;106(1 Suppl 1):eS26-34. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4338.
8
Walking and bicycling: an evaluation of environmental audit instruments.步行与骑行:环境审计工具评估
Am J Health Promot. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(1):21-37. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.1.21.
9
Use of and short-term impacts of new cycling infrastructure in inner-Sydney, Australia: a quasi-experimental design.澳大利亚悉尼市中心新自行车道设施的使用情况及其短期影响:一项准实验设计
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Oct 6;12:129. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0294-1.
10
Perceived Neighborhood Environmental Attributes Associated with Walking and Cycling for Transport among Adult Residents of 17 Cities in 12 Countries: The IPEN Study.12个国家17个城市成年居民中与步行和骑行出行相关的邻里环境感知属性:国际人体暴露和环境污染物队列(IPEN)研究
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Mar;124(3):290-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409466. Epub 2015 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Cycling infrastructure as a determinant of cycling for recreation and transportation in Montréal, Canada: a natural experiment using the longitudinal national population health survey.加拿大蒙特利尔市自行车基础设施对休闲及通勤骑行的影响:基于全国纵向人口健康调查的自然实验
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jun 10;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01767-y.
2
The contribution of active transportation to population physical activity levels.主动出行对人群身体活动水平的贡献。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2025 May;45(5):249-255. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.45.5.03.
3
The effectiveness of new urban trail infrastructure on physical activity and active transportation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of natural experiments.
新型城市步道基础设施对身体活动和主动运输的有效性:自然实验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Mar 27;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01729-4.
4
"In small places, close to home": Urban environmental impacts on child rights across four global cities.“在离家近的小地方”:四大全球城市的城市环境对儿童权利的影响。
Health Place. 2023 Sep;83:103081. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103081. Epub 2023 Jul 26.