• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大自行车道舒适度和安全性(Can-BICS)分类系统:一种用于自行车基础设施的通用命名约定。

The Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety (Can-BICS) Classification System: A common naming convention for cycling infrastructure.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Sep;40(9):288-293. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.9.04.

DOI:10.24095/hpcdp.40.9.04
PMID:32909939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7534561/
Abstract

There is no standard naming convention for cycling infrastructure across cities. Our aim was to develop a common nomenclature for cycling infrastructure in Canada, relevant to the context of public health practice. We drew on transportation engineering design guides and public health guidance to develop a bicycle facility classification system: the Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety (Can-BICS) classification system, a three-tiered classification scheme that groups five bicycle facilities based on safety performance and user comfort. Adopting consistent nomenclature as per the Can-BICS system will support regional and national surveillance efforts in public health, planning and sustainability.

摘要

城市间自行车基础设施的命名规范并不统一。我们旨在为加拿大的自行车基础设施制定一个通用术语,使其与公共卫生实践的背景相关。我们借鉴了交通工程设计指南和公共卫生指南,制定了自行车设施分类系统:加拿大自行车道舒适度和安全性(Can-BICS)分类系统,这是一个三级分类方案,根据安全性和用户舒适度将五种自行车设施进行分组。采用符合 Can-BICS 系统的一致术语将支持公共卫生、规划和可持续性方面的区域和国家监测工作。

相似文献

1
The Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety (Can-BICS) Classification System: A common naming convention for cycling infrastructure.加拿大自行车道舒适度和安全性(Can-BICS)分类系统:一种用于自行车基础设施的通用命名约定。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2020 Sep;40(9):288-293. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.40.9.04.
2
The Canadian Bikeway Comfort and Safety metrics (Can-BICS): National measures of the bicycling environment for use in research and policy.加拿大自行车道舒适度和安全性指标(Can-BICS):用于研究和政策的自行车环境国家测量指标。
Health Rep. 2022 Oct 19;33(10):3-13. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202201000001-eng.
3
Do Safe Bike Lanes Really Slow Down Cars? A Simulation-Based Approach to Investigate the Effect of Retrofitting Safe Cycling Lanes on Vehicular Traffic.安全自行车道真的能让汽车减速吗?一种基于模拟的方法来研究改造安全自行车道对车辆交通的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3818. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073818.
4
The safety of urban cycle tracks: a review of the literature.城市自行车道的安全性:文献综述。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;52:219-27. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
On the effect of networks of cycle-tracks on the risk of cycling. The case of Seville.关于自行车道网络对骑行风险的影响。以塞维利亚为例。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
6
Provisional COVID-19 infrastructure induces large, rapid increases in cycling.临时的新冠疫情基础设施促使骑行量大幅、迅速增加。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024399118.
7
Bicycling crashes on streetcar (tram) or train tracks: mixed methods to identify prevention measures.在有轨电车或火车轨道上发生的自行车碰撞事故:确定预防措施的混合方法。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 22;16:617. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3242-3.
8
Bicycle Facilities That Address Safety, Crime, and Economic Development: Perceptions from Morelia, Mexico.兼顾安全、犯罪和经济发展的自行车设施:来自墨西哥莫雷利亚的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 22;15(1):1. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010001.
9
Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case-crossover design.运用病例交叉设计比较基础设施对交叉口和非交叉口骑车受伤影响。
Inj Prev. 2013 Oct;19(5):303-10. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040561. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
10
Bike Lane Obstructions in Manhattan, New York City: Implications for Bicyclist Safety.纽约曼哈顿自行车道障碍物:对自行车骑行者安全的影响。
J Community Health. 2019 Apr;44(2):396-399. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-00596-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cycling infrastructure as a determinant of cycling for recreation and transportation in Montréal, Canada: a natural experiment using the longitudinal national population health survey.加拿大蒙特利尔市自行车基础设施对休闲及通勤骑行的影响:基于全国纵向人口健康调查的自然实验
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jun 10;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01767-y.
2
The contribution of active transportation to population physical activity levels.主动出行对人群身体活动水平的贡献。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2025 May;45(5):249-255. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.45.5.03.
3
The effectiveness of new urban trail infrastructure on physical activity and active transportation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of natural experiments.新型城市步道基础设施对身体活动和主动运输的有效性:自然实验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Mar 27;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01729-4.
4
Riding through the pandemic: Using Strava data to monitor the impacts of COVID-19 on spatial patterns of bicycling.穿越疫情:利用Strava数据监测新冠疫情对自行车骑行空间模式的影响
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2022 Sep;15:100667. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100667. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
5
Not quite a block party: COVID-19 street reallocation programs in Seattle, WA and Vancouver, BC.不完全是街区派对:华盛顿州西雅图市和不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市的新冠疫情期间街道重新分配计划。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Mar 9;14:100769. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100769. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep (PASS) Indicator Framework.身体活动、久坐行为与睡眠(PASS)指标框架
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2017 Aug;37(8):252-256. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.37.8.04.
2
Bike Score®: Associations between urban bikeability and cycling behavior in 24 cities.自行车评分®:24个城市的城市自行车友好性与骑行行为之间的关联
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Feb 11;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0339-0.
3
Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: a case-crossover study.道路基础设施与自行车骑行者受伤风险:病例交叉研究。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Dec;102(12):2336-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300762. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
4
Route preferences among adults in the near market for bicycling: findings of the cycling in cities study.成年人对自行车出行的偏好路线:城市骑行研究的发现。
Am J Health Promot. 2010 Sep-Oct;25(1):40-7. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.081006-QUAN-236.