• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新评估与未患糖尿病的对照组相比,二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病的生存优势证据:一项回顾性队列研究。

Reassessing the evidence of a survival advantage in Type 2 diabetes treated with metformin compared with controls without diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Keys Matthew Thomas, Thinggaard Mikael, Larsen Lisbeth Aagaard, Pedersen Dorthe Almind, Hallas Jesper, Christensen Kaare

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Biodemography, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

The Danish Twin Registry, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 13;51(6):1886-1898. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac200.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyac200
PMID:36287641
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has suggested that individuals with Type 2 diabetes and initiated on metformin monotherapy present with a survival advantage compared with the general population without diabetes. This finding has generated considerable interest in the prophylactic use of metformin against age-related morbidity.

METHODS

Utilizing Danish National Health Registers, we assessed differences in survival associated with metformin monotherapy for Type 2 diabetes compared with no diagnosis of diabetes in both singleton and discordant twin populations between 1996 and 2012. Data were analysed in both nested case-control and matched cohort study designs, with incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and hazard ratios estimated using conditional logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression, respectively.

RESULTS

In case-control pairs matched on birth year and sex or co-twin (sex, birth year and familial factors), incident Type 2 diabetes with treatment by metformin monotherapy initiation compared with no diagnosis of diabetes was associated with increased mortality in both singletons (IRR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.37, 1.68) and discordant twin pairs (IRR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.35, 2.67). After adjusting for co-morbidities and social indicators, these associations were attenuated to 1.32 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.50) and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.10, 2.46), respectively. Increased mortality was observed across all levels of cumulative use and invariant to a range of study designs and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment initiation by metformin monotherapy in Type 2 diabetes was not associated with survival equal or superior to that of the general population without diabetes. Our contrasting findings compared with previous research are unlikely to be the result of differences in epidemiological or methodological parameters.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,与未患糖尿病的普通人群相比,开始接受二甲双胍单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者具有生存优势。这一发现引发了人们对二甲双胍预防与年龄相关疾病的广泛兴趣。

方法

利用丹麦国家健康登记册,我们评估了1996年至2012年间,单胎和异卵双胞胎人群中,2型糖尿病患者接受二甲双胍单药治疗与未被诊断为糖尿病者在生存方面的差异。数据采用嵌套病例对照研究和匹配队列研究设计进行分析,发病率比(IRR)和风险比分别使用条件逻辑回归和Cox比例风险回归进行估计。

结果

在按出生年份和性别或双胞胎(性别、出生年份和家族因素)匹配的病例对照对中,与未被诊断为糖尿病相比,开始接受二甲双胍单药治疗的2型糖尿病患者,在单胎(IRR = 1.52,95% CI:1.37,1.68)和异卵双胞胎对(IRR = 1.90,95% CI:1.35,2.67)中均与死亡率增加相关。在调整合并症和社会指标后,这些关联分别减弱至1.32(95% CI:1.16,1.50)和1.64(95% CI:1.10,2.46)。在所有累积使用水平上均观察到死亡率增加,且不受一系列研究设计和敏感性分析的影响。

结论

2型糖尿病患者开始使用二甲双胍单药治疗与生存情况并不等同于或优于未患糖尿病的普通人群。与先前研究相比,我们的对比结果不太可能是流行病学或方法学参数差异的结果。

相似文献

1
Reassessing the evidence of a survival advantage in Type 2 diabetes treated with metformin compared with controls without diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.重新评估与未患糖尿病的对照组相比,二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病的生存优势证据:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 13;51(6):1886-1898. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac200.
2
Can people with type 2 diabetes live longer than those without? A comparison of mortality in people initiated with metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy and matched, non-diabetic controls.2型糖尿病患者的寿命会比非糖尿病患者更长吗?对起始使用二甲双胍或磺脲类单药治疗的患者与匹配的非糖尿病对照者的死亡率进行比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Nov;16(11):1165-73. doi: 10.1111/dom.12354. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
3
Combination therapy with sulfonylureas and metformin and the prevention of death in type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study.磺酰脲类药物和二甲双胍联合治疗与 2 型糖尿病患者的死亡预防:一项巢式病例对照研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Apr;19(4):335-42. doi: 10.1002/pds.1834.
4
Mortality after incident cancer in people with and without type 2 diabetes: impact of metformin on survival.有 2 型糖尿病和无 2 型糖尿病患者癌症发病后的死亡率:二甲双胍对生存的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Feb;35(2):299-304. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1313. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
5
Sulfonylureas as Initial Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes and the Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia.磺酰脲类药物作为 2 型糖尿病的初始治疗与严重低血糖风险。
Am J Med. 2018 Mar;131(3):317.e11-317.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.09.044. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
6
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
7
Metformin use is associated with a lower risk of rotator cuff disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.二甲双胍的使用与 2 型糖尿病患者肩袖疾病风险降低相关。
Diabetes Metab. 2022 Sep;48(5):101368. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2022.101368. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
8
The use of metformin and the incidence of lung cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes.二甲双胍的使用与 2 型糖尿病患者肺癌的发生。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36(1):124-9. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0740. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
9
Increased cancer-related mortality for patients with type 2 diabetes who use sulfonylureas or insulin.使用磺脲类药物或胰岛素的2型糖尿病患者癌症相关死亡率增加。
Diabetes Care. 2006 Feb;29(2):254-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1558.
10
Depression and the risk of hospitalization in type 2 diabetes patients: A nested case-control study accounting for non-persistence to antidiabetic treatment.抑郁症与 2 型糖尿病患者住院风险:考虑到抗糖尿病治疗不持续的嵌套病例对照研究。
Diabetes Metab. 2022 Jul;48(4):101334. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2022.101334. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver, ageing and disease.肝脏、衰老与疾病。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1038/s41575-025-01099-z.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Metformin Versus Sulfonylureas on Exceptional Longevity in Women With Type 2 Diabetes: Target Trial Emulation.二甲双胍与磺脲类药物对2型糖尿病女性超长寿命的比较效果:目标试验模拟
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Jun 10;80(7). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf095.
3
Biomarkers of aging: from molecules and surrogates to physiology and function.衰老的生物标志物:从分子与替代指标到生理学与功能
Physiol Rev. 2025 Jul 1;105(3):1609-1694. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2024. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
4
Attitudes towards geroprotection: measuring willingness, from lifestyle changes to drug use.对老年保护的态度:衡量从生活方式改变到药物使用的意愿。
Front Aging. 2024 Nov 5;5:1440661. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2024.1440661. eCollection 2024.
5
Healthy aging: Linking causal mechanisms with holistic outcomes.健康老龄化:将因果机制与整体结果联系起来。
Aging Cell. 2024 Jan;23(1):e14065. doi: 10.1111/acel.14065. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
Geroprotector drugs and exercise: friends or foes on healthy longevity?抗衰老药物与运动:对健康长寿是友是敌?
BMC Biol. 2023 Dec 8;21(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01779-9.
7
SGLT inhibitors for improving Healthspan and lifespan.SGLT 抑制剂可改善健康寿命和寿命。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Nov-Dec;81:2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2023.10.003. Epub 2023 Oct 17.