Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Department of Biostatistics & Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Pain Physician. 2022 Oct;25(7):E959-E968.
Web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has increased access to effective pain management. Though efficacy of web-based and face-to-face CBT may be comparable, fewer studies have examined whether remote clinical support in addition to web-based CBT can improve pain-related outcomes.
The objectives of this study were to determine if the addition of phone-based support to web-based CBT could enhance pain-related outcomes in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP).
Randomized controlled clinical trial.
The internal medicine and rheumatology clinics at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist.
Patients were recruited from a major academic medical center. Sixty patients were randomized to web-based CBT with 6 phone calls (nurse support group, n = 30) vs web-based CBT alone (control group, n = 30). The purpose of the calls was to enhance patients' engagement in the online program. All patients had access to the program from baseline to week 16. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, week 8, and week 16. Adjusting for baseline measurements, analysis of covariance was used to determine within- and between-group differences.
Both nurse support and control groups demonstrated significant within-group improvements in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference (-1.3 [-2.0, -0.7, P < 0.05] and -1.7 [-2.3, -1.0, P < 0.05]), BPI pain intensity (-1.2 [-1.7, -0.6, P < 0.05] and -1.3 [-1.8, -0.8, P < 0.05]), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) pain interference (-5.0 [-6.9, -3.2, P < 0.05] and -5.4 [-7.2, -3.5, P < 0.05]), and PROMIS pain intensity (-1.4 [-2.0, -0.9, P < 0.05] and -1.4 [-1.9, -0.8, P < 0.05]), respectively. However, there were no significant between-group differences amongst the 2 treatment groups in all measures, except PROMIS sleep disturbance that favored the nurse support group (50.5 ± 1.3 vs 54.3 ± 1.3, P < 0.05).
Small sample size and lack of treatment fidelity assessment.
Web-based CBT was effective with and without motivational support from nurses. Phone-based support did not enhance pain-related outcomes of web-based CBT. If confirmed in a larger study, web-based CBT without motivational support may be considered as a low-cost treatment intervention for patients with CMP.
基于网络的认知行为疗法(CBT)增加了获得有效疼痛管理的机会。尽管基于网络的 CBT 和面对面的 CBT 可能具有相当的疗效,但较少的研究探讨了在基于网络的 CBT 之外增加远程临床支持是否可以改善与疼痛相关的结果。
本研究的目的是确定在患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)的患者中,基于网络的 CBT 加电话支持是否可以增强与疼痛相关的结果。
随机对照临床试验。
阿特鲁姆健康威克森林浸礼会的内科和风湿病诊所。
从一家主要的学术医疗中心招募患者。将 60 名患者随机分为接受基于网络的 CBT 加 6 次电话(护士支持组,n = 30)和仅接受基于网络的 CBT(对照组,n = 30)。这些电话的目的是增强患者对在线计划的参与度。所有患者均从基线到第 16 周都可以使用该程序。在基线、第 8 周和第 16 周收集了结果测量值。使用协方差分析来确定组内和组间的差异,同时考虑基线测量值。
护士支持组和对照组均在简明疼痛量表(BPI)疼痛干扰(-1.3 [ -2.0,-0.7,P < 0.05] 和 -1.7 [ -2.3,-1.0,P < 0.05])、BPI 疼痛强度(-1.2 [ -1.7,-0.6,P < 0.05] 和 -1.3 [ -1.8,-0.8,P < 0.05])、患者报告的结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛干扰(-5.0 [ -6.9,-3.2,P < 0.05] 和 -5.4 [ -7.2,-3.5,P < 0.05])和 PROMIS 疼痛强度(-1.4 [ -2.0,-0.9,P < 0.05] 和 -1.4 [ -1.9,-0.8,P < 0.05])方面均有显著的组内改善。然而,在所有措施中,除了 PROMIS 睡眠障碍(支持护士的组为 50.5 ± 1.3,对照组为 54.3 ± 1.3,P < 0.05)外,两组之间在所有措施中均无显著差异。
样本量小,缺乏治疗保真度评估。
基于网络的 CBT 结合护士的动机支持是有效的。基于电话的支持并没有增强基于网络的 CBT 的疼痛相关结果。如果在更大的研究中得到证实,没有动机支持的基于网络的 CBT 可能被认为是 CMP 患者的一种低成本治疗干预措施。