Suppr超能文献

互联网和面对面认知行为疗法治疗产后抑郁症与常规治疗相比:MumMoodBooster 的随机对照试验。

Internet and Face-to-face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Postnatal Depression Compared With Treatment as Usual: Randomized Controlled Trial of MumMoodBooster.

机构信息

Parent-Infant Research Institute, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Heidelberg Heights, Australia.

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 8;23(12):e17185. doi: 10.2196/17185.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous research has confirmed that symptoms of postnatal depression (PND) can be ameliorated through internet-delivered psychological interventions. Advantages of internet-delivered treatment include anonymity, convenience, and catering to women who are unable to access face-to-face (FTF) treatments. To date, no research has examined the efficacy of such interventions compared directly with FTF treatments in women clinically diagnosed with PND.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy of one of the first web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions (internet CBT+coach calls) for PND (MumMoodBooster [MMB]) with FTF-CBT in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS

In this study, 116 postnatal women with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) diagnosis of major or minor depression were randomized to MMB (39/116, 33.6%), FTF-CBT (39/116, 33.6%), or a treatment-as-usual (TAU) control condition (38/116, 32.8%). Diagnostic status was determined at baseline and at 21-week follow-up using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV. Severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms was evaluated using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales and the revised Beck Depression Inventory at baseline, 12-week follow-up (after treatment), and 21-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 116 participants, 107 (92.2%) had a diagnosis of major depression at baseline. Rates of remission from a major or minor depressive episode at 21 weeks in both the FTF-CBT and MMB groups were superior to that of the TAU group (56.6% and 47.7% less likely to be depressed, respectively) and they were not significantly different from each other. Although remission rates differed between TAU and FTF-CBT, growth models showed that, in terms of symptom reduction across time, the FTF-CBT treatment was not significantly better than TAU. By comparison, MMB was statistically superior to both TAU and FTF-CBT in reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress from baseline to the 21-week follow-up (large and moderate effect sizes). Thus, after 21 weeks, the average symptom scores for depression and anxiety of women receiving MMB were approximately half those of women in both the TAU and FTF-CBT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this RCT, MMB was at least as effective as FTF-CBT in achieving remission from a diagnosed PND episode. MMB was superior to TAU and FTF-CBT in encouraging and maintaining reduction of symptom severity over the 21-week follow-up for depressed postnatal women. These findings replicate results of prior studies on MMB that showed clinically significant improvements in depressive symptoms, and they provide direct empirical support that internet-delivered treatment for depressed postnatal women is a viable alternative to FTF treatment. The generalizability of the results needs to be examined in future research, as RCTs of internet-based versus FTF treatments necessarily involve a subset of people who are willing to undertake either modality of treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12613000881730; https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364683&isReview=true.

摘要

背景

先前的研究已经证实,产后抑郁症(PND)的症状可以通过互联网提供的心理干预得到改善。互联网治疗的优势包括匿名性、便利性,以及满足无法接受面对面(FTF)治疗的女性的需求。迄今为止,尚无研究直接比较过此类干预措施与临床诊断为 PND 的女性的 FTF 治疗在疗效方面的差异。

目的

本研究旨在比较一种基于网络的认知行为疗法(CBT)干预措施(互联网 CBT+教练电话)(MumMoodBooster [MMB])与 FTF-CBT 在随机对照试验(RCT)中治疗 PND 的疗效。

方法

在这项研究中,116 名产后妇女被诊断患有精神障碍诊断与统计手册第四版(DSM-IV)的重度或轻度抑郁症,被随机分配到 MMB(39/116,33.6%)、FTF-CBT(39/116,33.6%)或治疗作为常规(TAU)对照组(38/116,32.8%)。在基线和 21 周随访时使用 DSM-IV 的结构化临床访谈来确定诊断状态。使用抑郁焦虑压力量表和修订后的贝克抑郁量表在基线、12 周随访(治疗后)和 21 周随访时评估焦虑和抑郁症状的严重程度。

结果

在 116 名参与者中,有 107 名(92.2%)在基线时有重度抑郁症的诊断。在 21 周时,FTF-CBT 和 MMB 组的重度或轻度抑郁发作缓解率均优于 TAU 组(分别降低 56.6%和 47.7%),且与其他组之间没有显著差异。尽管 TAU 和 FTF-CBT 之间的缓解率存在差异,但增长模型显示,就症状随时间的减轻而言,FTF-CBT 治疗并不显著优于 TAU。相比之下,MMB 在降低抑郁、焦虑和压力的症状方面在统计学上优于 TAU 和 FTF-CBT,从基线到 21 周随访(大到中度的效应量)。因此,在 21 周后,接受 MMB 的女性的抑郁和焦虑症状的平均症状评分约为 TAU 和 FTF-CBT 组的一半。

结论

在这项 RCT 中,MMB 至少与 FTF-CBT 一样有效,可以缓解诊断为 PND 的发作。与 TAU 和 FTF-CBT 相比,MMB 更有利于鼓励和维持抑郁产后女性的症状严重程度的降低,在 21 周的随访期间。这些发现复制了之前关于 MMB 的研究结果,表明抑郁症状有显著改善,并为互联网治疗抑郁产后女性提供了直接的实证支持,这是 FTF 治疗的一种可行替代方案。由于 RCT 涉及的是愿意接受任何一种治疗方式的人群,因此需要在未来的研究中检验结果的普遍性。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)ACTRN12613000881730;https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364683&isReview=true。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9e5/8701704/3878ab37f447/jmir_v23i12e17185_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验