• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析和加强日本抗肿瘤药物民族差异的风险管理。

Analysis and enhancement of risk management for ethnic differences in antineoplastic drugs in Japan.

机构信息

Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, 100-0013, Japan.

Office of New Drug V, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):1292. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08685-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08685-w
PMID:36289504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9609241/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk management in the post-marketing phase is crucial to minimize health problems caused by drugs. Because ethnic factors may affect drug safety, the objective of this study was to explore concrete approaches to reflecting ethnic factors in risk management under multi-regional drug development.

METHODS

We assessed Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) review reports on antineoplastic drugs approved as new molecular entities in the last 10 years to identify any differences in the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to myelosuppression, hepatic impairment, renal impairment, and interstitial lung disease between Japanese and non-Japanese populations. In addition, we investigated how those ADRs were handled in the labeling of each drug.

RESULTS

In total, 44 drugs were available for comparing the incidence of ADRs between Japanese and non-Japanese populations. Of these, 32 drugs had a higher incidence of ADRs in the Japanese population. However, the incidence of ADRs in the Japanese population was described in the labeling for 7 drugs, and only the incidence in the overall population in multi-regional phase III trials was described in the labeling for the remaining 25 drugs. Of these 25 drugs, two drugs were immediately placed under emergency safety control measures after approval because of the high incidence of ADRs in Japanese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

For drugs that might cause serious ADRs and with a higher incidence in the Japanese population, information should be provided on the incidence in the Japanese population as well as in the overall population.

摘要

背景

上市后阶段的风险管理对于最小化药物引起的健康问题至关重要。由于种族因素可能会影响药物安全性,因此本研究的目的是探讨在多区域药物开发中反映种族因素的具体方法。

方法

我们评估了过去 10 年中作为新分子实体批准的抗肿瘤药物的药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)审查报告,以确定与骨髓抑制、肝损伤、肾损伤和间质性肺病相关的不良反应(ADR)在日本人和非日本人中的发生率是否存在差异。此外,我们还研究了这些 ADR 在每种药物标签中的处理方式。

结果

共有 44 种药物可用于比较日本人和非日本人中 ADR 的发生率。其中,32 种药物在日本人群中的 ADR 发生率更高。然而,7 种药物的标签中描述了日本人群中 ADR 的发生率,而其余 25 种药物的标签中仅描述了多区域 III 期试验中总体人群中的 ADR 发生率。在这 25 种药物中,由于日本患者 ADR 发生率较高,有两种药物在批准后立即采取了紧急安全控制措施。

结论

对于可能引起严重 ADR 且在日本人群中发生率较高的药物,应提供日本人群和总体人群中发生率的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/9609241/5da04ff4f699/12913_2022_8685_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/9609241/36aa2ff14a63/12913_2022_8685_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/9609241/5da04ff4f699/12913_2022_8685_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/9609241/36aa2ff14a63/12913_2022_8685_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddc1/9609241/5da04ff4f699/12913_2022_8685_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis and enhancement of risk management for ethnic differences in antineoplastic drugs in Japan.分析和加强日本抗肿瘤药物民族差异的风险管理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):1292. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08685-w.
2
Real-world treatment of over 1600 Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer with daily afatinib.真实世界中日方 1600 多例 EGFR 突变阳性非小细胞肺癌患者每日使用阿法替尼治疗的情况。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug;24(8):917-926. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01439-5. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
3
Characteristics of adverse drug reactions in a vemurafenib early post-marketing phase vigilance study in Japan.在日本维莫非尼早期上市后监测研究中药物不良反应的特征。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 Feb;20(2):169-175. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1706-2. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
4
[The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency's Approach to Facilitate Risk Communication and Its Challenges].[药品和医疗器械局促进风险沟通的方法及其挑战]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(3):307-314. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00185-2.
5
A Sponsor's Perspective on the Contribution of Regulatory-Required Observational Post-Marketing Studies to Understanding Human Drug Product Benefit/Risk in Japan.监管要求的观察性上市后研究对理解日本药品的获益/风险的贡献:赞助商视角
Pharmaceut Med. 2024 May;38(3):217-224. doi: 10.1007/s40290-024-00521-2. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
6
Safety-Related Regulatory Actions and Risk Factors for Anticancer Drugs in Japan.日本抗癌药物的安全相关监管行动及风险因素
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Feb;33(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s40290-018-0260-8.
7
Potentials and limitations of nonclinical safety assessment for predicting clinical adverse drug reactions: correlation analysis of 142 approved drugs in Japan.非临床安全性评估预测临床药物不良反应的潜力和局限性:日本 142 种获批药物的相关性分析。
J Toxicol Sci. 2013;38(4):581-98. doi: 10.2131/jts.38.581.
8
Evaluation of rapid drug safety communication materials for patients in Japan.日本快速药物安全通讯材料的评估。
Drug Discov Ther. 2021 May 11;15(2):101-107. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01028. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
Factors distinguishing important identified risks from important potential risks in orphan and nonorphan drugs: An analysis of safety specifications of Japan and European Union risk management plans.区分罕见病药物和非罕见病药物中已识别的重要风险与潜在重要风险的因素:日本和欧盟风险管理计划安全规范分析
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):1231-1238. doi: 10.1002/pds.4646. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.评估患者向英国“黄卡计划”报告药物不良反应的情况:文献回顾、描述性和定性分析以及问卷调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(20):1-234, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15200.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the impact of Japanese-specific long-term safety data on new drug approval.评估日本特有长期安全性数据对新药审批的影响。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Nov;14(6):2339-2347. doi: 10.1111/cts.13098. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
2
The Impact of Variability in Patient Exposure During Premarket Clinical Development on Postmarket Safety Outcomes.患者在上市前临床开发期间的暴露变异性对上市后安全性结局的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;110(6):1512-1525. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2320. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
3
Is there evidence for the racialization of pharmaceutical regulation? Systematic comparison of new drugs approved over five years in the USA and the EU.
是否有药物监管种族化的证据?对美国和欧盟五年内批准的新药进行系统比较。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;280:114049. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114049. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Interstitial Lung Disease as an Adverse Drug Reaction in Japan: Exploration of Regulatory Actions as a Basis for High Reporting.日本的药物不良反应性间质性肺病:以高报告率为基础对监管措施的探索。
Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;43(11):1121-1131. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00968-7.
5
Evaluation of Pre-marketing Factors to Predict Post-marketing Boxed Warnings and Safety Withdrawals.评估上市前因素以预测上市后黑框警告和安全性撤市情况。
Drug Saf. 2017 Jun;40(6):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0526-1.
6
Recommendations for the Use of WBC Growth Factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新:白细胞生长因子的应用建议。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3199-212. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3488. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients with lung cancer: a cohort and nested case-control study.日本肺癌患者的间质性肺疾病:一项队列研究和巢式病例对照研究
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun 15;177(12):1348-57. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200710-1501OC. Epub 2008 Mar 12.
8
Adverse drug events: identification and attribution.
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1987 Nov;21(11):915-20. doi: 10.1177/106002808702101114.