• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本快速药物安全通讯材料的评估。

Evaluation of rapid drug safety communication materials for patients in Japan.

机构信息

Behavioral Science Division, Behavioral Sciences and Survivorship Research Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine & School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Drug Discov Ther. 2021 May 11;15(2):101-107. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01028. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

DOI:10.5582/ddt.2021.01028
PMID:33952763
Abstract

Since 2011, pharmaceutical companies in Japan have been required to issue two types of documents regarding severe adverse drug reactions reported post-marketing, namely the Rapid Safety Communication Materials for Patients and the Related Materials. However, the adequacy of these documents has not yet been systematically assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of these two types of materials. The Rapid Safety Communications for Patients were obtained from the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) website. The Related Materials were obtained from pharmaceutical companies or the PMDA website. Three assessors independently scored the Rapid Safety Communication for Patients and the Related Materials using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CCI). In addition, the contents and descriptions of the materials were analyzed. In total, 13 materials for seven drugs were assessed. Almost all materials contained the "main message" and "call to action". However, the average CCI scores for the Rapid Safety Communication for Patients and Related Materials for Patients were 68.8 and 74.3 (out of 100), respectively. Further, none of the evaluated materials were scored above the CCI threshold score (i.e., ≥ 90%). Descriptions regarding "language", "state of science", and "risk" were not adequate. In particular, the terminology used in materials seemed difficult for patients to understand. In conclusion, the Japanese Rapid Communication Materials for Patients require improvement. Furthermore, a system for evaluating these materials prior to publication should be established.

摘要

自 2011 年以来,日本的制药公司被要求发布两种与上市后报告的严重药物不良反应相关的文件,即快速安全通讯材料和相关材料。然而,这些文件的充分性尚未得到系统评估。本研究旨在评估这两种材料的充分性。快速安全通讯材料是从药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)的网站上获得的。相关材料是从制药公司或 PMDA 的网站上获得的。三位评估员使用疾病控制与预防中心明确沟通指数(CCI),分别对快速安全通讯材料和相关材料进行独立评分。此外,还对材料的内容和描述进行了分析。总共评估了七种药物的 13 种材料。几乎所有的材料都包含“主要信息”和“行动呼吁”。然而,快速安全通讯材料和相关材料的平均 CCI 得分分别为 68.8 和 74.3(满分 100 分)。此外,没有一份评估材料的 CCI 得分超过阈值分数(即≥90%)。关于“语言”、“科学状况”和“风险”的描述不充分。特别是,材料中使用的术语似乎让患者难以理解。总之,日本的快速通讯材料需要改进。此外,应该建立一个在发布前评估这些材料的系统。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of rapid drug safety communication materials for patients in Japan.日本快速药物安全通讯材料的评估。
Drug Discov Ther. 2021 May 11;15(2):101-107. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2021.01028. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
2
[The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency's Approach to Facilitate Risk Communication and Its Challenges].[药品和医疗器械局促进风险沟通的方法及其挑战]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(3):307-314. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00185-2.
3
The MIHARI project: establishing a new framework for pharmacoepidemiological drug safety assessments by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japan.日本药品和医疗器械局的MIHARI项目:建立药物流行病学药物安全性评估新框架
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):854-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.4032. Epub 2016 May 25.
4
Analysis and enhancement of risk management for ethnic differences in antineoplastic drugs in Japan.分析和加强日本抗肿瘤药物民族差异的风险管理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):1292. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08685-w.
5
Risk Management Plans: are they a tool for improving drug safety?风险管理计划:它们是提高药物安全性的工具吗?
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Aug;66(8):785-90. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0848-8. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
6
The role of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency and healthcare professionals in post-marketing safety.药品和医疗器械局及医疗保健专业人员在上市后安全性方面的作用。
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;7(2):103-7. doi: 10.1007/s12328-014-0474-6. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
7
[Risk/Benefit Communication: International Developments and Prospects for the Future].[风险/收益沟通:国际发展与未来前景]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(3):299-306. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00185-1.
8
[Safe Use of Recent New Drugs-Current Status and Challenges].[近期新药的安全使用——现状与挑战]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(2):177-183. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.17-00174-3.
9
Effectiveness of drug postmarketing all-case surveillance as a safety measure in Japan.药品上市后全病例监测作为日本一项安全措施的有效性。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021 Dec 16;12:20420986211065215. doi: 10.1177/20420986211065215. eCollection 2021.
10
Unlicensed pharmaceutical preparations for clinical patient care: Ensuring safety.用于临床患者护理的未经许可的药物制剂:确保安全。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Jan;27(1):3-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.4335. Epub 2017 Oct 19.