Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;29(10):7598-7606. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100600.
Functional outcomes are important for oncology patients undergoing lower extremity reconstruction. The objective of the current study was to describe patient reported function after surgery and identify predictors of postoperative function in musculoskeletal oncology patients undergoing lower extremity endoprosthetic reconstruction.
We performed a cohort study with functional outcome data from the recently completed (PARITY) trial. We utilized the 100-point Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), which was administered pre-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Higher scores indicate better physical functioning, and the minimally important difference is 11 points. We calculated mean functional scores at each timepoint after surgery and developed a logistic regression model to explore predictors of failure to achieve excellent post-operative function (TESS ≥ 80) at 1 year after surgery.
The 555 patients included in our cohort showed important functional improvement from pre-surgery to 1 year post-surgery (mean difference 14.9 points, 95%CI 12.2 to 17.6; < 0.001) and 64% achieved excellent post-operative function. Our adjusted regression model found that poor (TESS 0-39) pre-operative function (odds ratio [OR] 3.3, 95%CI 1.6 to 6.6); absolute risk [AR] 24%, 95%CI 8% to 41.2%), older age (OR per 10-year increase from age 12, 1.32, 95%CI 1.17, 1.49; AR 4.5%, 95%CI 2.4% to 6.6%), and patients undergoing reconstruction for soft-tissue sarcomas (OR 2.3, 95%CI 1.03 to 5.01; AR 15.3%, 95%CI 0.4% to 34.4%), were associated with higher odds of failing to achieve an excellent functional outcome at 1-year follow-up. Patients undergoing reconstruction for giant cell tumors were more likely to achieve an excellent functional outcome post-operatively (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.95; AR -9.9%, 95%CI -14.4% to -0.7%).
The majority of patients with tumors of the lower extremity undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction achieved excellent function at 1 year after surgery. Older age, poor pre-operative function, and endoprosthetic reconstruction for soft tissue sarcomas were associated with worse outcomes; reconstruction for giant cell tumors was associated with better post-operative function.
Therapeutic Level IV.
功能结果对于接受下肢重建的肿瘤患者很重要。本研究的目的是描述接受下肢假体重建的肌肉骨骼肿瘤患者手术后的患者报告功能,并确定术后功能的预测因素。
我们进行了一项队列研究,该研究的数据来自最近完成的 (PARITY) 试验。我们使用了 100 分的多伦多肢体挽救评分(TESS),该评分在术前以及术后 3、6 和 12 个月进行评估。更高的分数表示更好的身体功能,最小重要差异为 11 分。我们计算了手术后每个时间点的平均功能评分,并开发了一个逻辑回归模型来探讨预测因素,以预测 1 年后手术是否无法达到优秀的术后功能(TESS≥80)。
我们的队列包括 555 名患者,他们在手术后从术前到 1 年时表现出重要的功能改善(平均差异 14.9 分,95%CI 12.2 至 17.6;<0.001),64%的患者达到了优秀的术后功能。我们的调整后的回归模型发现,术前功能较差(TESS 0-39)(优势比[OR]3.3,95%CI 1.6 至 6.6);绝对风险[AR]24%,95%CI 8%至 41.2%)、年龄较大(每增加 10 岁的 OR 为 1.32,95%CI 1.17 至 1.49;AR 为 4.5%,95%CI 2.4%至 6.6%)以及因软组织肉瘤而接受重建的患者(OR 2.3,95%CI 1.03 至 5.01;AR 为 15.3%,95%CI 0.4%至 34.4%),与 1 年随访时无法达到优秀功能结局的可能性更高相关。因骨巨细胞瘤而接受重建的患者术后更有可能获得优秀的功能结局(OR 0.40,95%CI 0.17 至 0.95;AR-9.9%,95%CI-14.4%至-0.7%)。
大多数接受下肢假体重建的下肢肿瘤患者在手术后 1 年内获得了优秀的功能。年龄较大、术前功能较差以及软组织肉瘤的假体重建与较差的结果相关;骨巨细胞瘤的重建与术后功能更好相关。
治疗性 IV 级。