• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主动监测对低危和中危前列腺癌中 Gleason 评分升级和预后的影响。

Influence of Active Surveillance on Gleason Score Upgrade and Prognosis in Low- and Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China.

Department of Urology, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou 318020, China.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 21;29(10):7964-7978. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100630.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol29100630
PMID:36290907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9600547/
Abstract

Few studies have focused on the link between active surveillance (AS) and Gleason score upgrade (GSU) and its impact on the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to analyze the effect of AS duration on GSU and prognostic value based on risk stratification. All eligible patients were risk-stratified according to AUA guidelines into low-risk (LR), favorable intermediate-risk (FIR), and unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) PCa. Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database, 28,368 LR, 27,243 FIR, and 12,210 UIR PCa patients were included. The relationship between AS duration and GSU was identified with univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Discrimination according to risk stratification of AS duration and GSU was tested by Kaplan-Meier analysis and competing risk regression models. The proportion of patients who chose AS was the highest among LR PCa (3434, 12.1%), while the proportion in UIR PCa was the lowest (887, 7.3%). The AS duration was only associated with GSU in LR PCa, with a high Gleason score (GS) at diagnosis being a strong predictor of GSU for FIR and UIR PCa. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that long-term surveillance only made a significant difference in prognosis in UIR PCa. The competing risk analysis indicated that once GS was upgraded to 8 or above, the prognosis in each group was significantly worse. AS is recommended for LR and FIR PCa until GS is upgraded to 8, but AS may not be suitable for some UIR PCa patients.

摘要

很少有研究关注主动监测 (AS) 与 Gleason 评分升级 (GSU) 之间的联系及其对前列腺癌 (PCa) 患者预后的影响。本研究旨在分析 AS 持续时间对 GSU 的影响,并根据风险分层分析其预后价值。所有符合条件的患者均根据 AUA 指南分为低危 (LR)、中危有利 (FIR) 和中危不利 (UIR) PCa。在监测、流行病学和最终结果计划 (SEER) 数据库中,纳入了 28368 例 LR、27243 例 FIR 和 12210 例 UIR PCa 患者。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定 AS 持续时间与 GSU 之间的关系。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析和竞争风险回归模型测试 AS 持续时间和 GSU 风险分层的区分能力。在 LR PCa 中,选择 AS 的患者比例最高 (3434,12.1%),而在 UIR PCa 中比例最低 (887,7.3%)。AS 持续时间仅与 LR PCa 的 GSU 相关,诊断时高 GS 是 FIR 和 UIR PCa 发生 GSU 的强烈预测因素。Kaplan-Meier 分析表明,长期监测仅对 UIR PCa 的预后有显著影响。竞争风险分析表明,一旦 GS 升级到 8 或更高,每组的预后都会显著恶化。建议对 LR 和 FIR PCa 进行 AS,直到 GS 升级到 8,但 AS 可能不适合某些 UIR PCa 患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a63/9600547/75faa3fd26ae/curroncol-29-00630-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a63/9600547/2eaa72efe5e3/curroncol-29-00630-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a63/9600547/75faa3fd26ae/curroncol-29-00630-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a63/9600547/2eaa72efe5e3/curroncol-29-00630-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a63/9600547/75faa3fd26ae/curroncol-29-00630-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of Active Surveillance on Gleason Score Upgrade and Prognosis in Low- and Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.主动监测对低危和中危前列腺癌中 Gleason 评分升级和预后的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 21;29(10):7964-7978. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100630.
2
Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.Gleason 评分 3+4“有利中危”前列腺癌的不良疾病特征:对主动监测的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.043. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
3
Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Men With Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.主动监测对中危前列腺癌患者的结局影响:基于人群的分析。
Urology. 2021 Sep;155:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.068. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
4
Detectable end of radiation prostate specific antigen assists in identifying men with unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer at high risk of distant recurrence and cancer-specific mortality.可检测到的放疗后前列腺特异性抗原终点有助于识别远处复发和癌症特异性死亡风险高的不良中危前列腺癌男性患者。
Prostate. 2018 Jun;78(8):623-630. doi: 10.1002/pros.23507. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
5
Long-term and pathological outcomes of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: implications for active surveillance.根治性前列腺切除术后低危和中危前列腺癌的长期和病理结局:对主动监测的影响。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3763-3770. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03717-2. Epub 2021 May 10.
6
LDR-Brachytherapy monotherapy appears unsuited for NCCN unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.LDR-Brachytherapy 单一疗法似乎不适合 NCCN 不利的中危前列腺癌患者。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Nov;41(11):454.e17-454.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
7
Does the Gleason Score 7 Upgrading Always Predict Worse Prognosis?前列腺癌 Gleason 评分 7 级升级是否总是预示着更差的预后?
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Dec;21(6):e412-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 7.
8
Prostate cancer mortality rates in low- and favorable intermediate-risk active surveillance patients: a population-based competing risks analysis.低风险和有利中风险主动监测患者的前列腺癌死亡率:基于人群的竞争风险分析。
World J Urol. 2023 Jan;41(1):93-99. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04228-4. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
9
Predictors for clinically relevant Gleason score upgrade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术患者中临床相关 Gleason 评分升级的预测因素。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(2):214-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10187.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
10
Different outcomes among favourable and unfavourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy.接受大分割放疗和雄激素剥夺治疗的低危和高危中危前列腺癌患者的不同结局。
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jun 8;11:78. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0656-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A modeling study to estimate prostate cancer-specific mortality on active surveillance for men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Results from the SEARCH cohort.一项针对具有有利中危前列腺癌的男性进行主动监测的前列腺癌特异性死亡率的建模研究:来自 SEARCH 队列的结果。
Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(9):10931-10938. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5805. Epub 2023 Apr 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.在中国队列中分析根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的危险因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7772-7780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4274. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
2
Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium.婚姻状况与前列腺癌发病风险:PRACTICAL 联盟 12 项病例对照研究的汇总分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;36(9):913-925. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00781-1. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
3
Active Surveillance Strategies for Low-Grade Prostate Cancer: Comparative Benefits and Cost-effectiveness.
主动监测策略在低级别前列腺癌中的应用:比较效益和成本效益。
Radiology. 2021 Sep;300(3):594-604. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204321. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
4
Long-term and pathological outcomes of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: implications for active surveillance.根治性前列腺切除术后低危和中危前列腺癌的长期和病理结局:对主动监测的影响。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3763-3770. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03717-2. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Does Time Spent on Active Surveillance Adversely Affect the Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Delayed Radical Prostatectomy?主动监测时间是否会对延迟行根治性前列腺切除术患者的病理和肿瘤学结局产生不利影响?
J Urol. 2020 Sep;204(3):476-482. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001070. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
7
Active surveillance in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.中危前列腺癌的主动监测。
BJU Int. 2020 Mar;125(3):346-354. doi: 10.1111/bju.14935. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
8
Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.年龄增长与 Gleason 评分为 6 分的前列腺癌男性行根治性前列腺切除术时升级和升级分期的几率。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Dec;17(6):e1116-e1121. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
Intensity of Active Surveillance and Transition to Treatment in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.低危前列腺癌患者主动监测的强度和向治疗的转化。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;3(5):640-647. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
10
Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer - 29-Year Follow-up.根治性前列腺切除术与前列腺癌观察等待-29 年随访结果。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-2329. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1807801.