Mercado Gabriela, Newson Ainsley J, Espinoza David, Cust Anne E, Smit Amelia K
The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney 2006, Australia.
Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 12;12(10):1704. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101704.
The evolution of polygenic scores for use in for disease prevention and control compels the development of guidelines to optimize their effectiveness and promote equitable use. Understanding the motivations and barriers to participation in genomics research can assist in drafting these standards. We investigated these in a community-based randomized controlled trial that examined the health behavioral impact of receiving personalized melanoma genomic risk information. We examined participant responses in a baseline questionnaire and conducted interviews post-trial participation. Motivations differed in two ways: (1) by gender, with those identifying as women placing greater importance on learning about their personal risk or familial risk, and how to reduce risk; and (2) by age in relation to learning about personal risk, and fear of developing melanoma. A barrier to participation was distrust in the handling of genomic data. Our findings provide new insights into the motivations for participating in genomics research and highlight the need to better target population subgroups including younger men, which will aid in tailoring recruitment for future genomic studies.
用于疾病预防和控制的多基因评分的演变促使人们制定指南,以优化其有效性并促进公平使用。了解参与基因组学研究的动机和障碍有助于起草这些标准。我们在一项基于社区的随机对照试验中对此进行了调查,该试验研究了接收个性化黑色素瘤基因组风险信息对健康行为的影响。我们在基线问卷中检查了参与者的回答,并在试验参与后进行了访谈。动机在两个方面存在差异:(1)按性别划分,自认为女性的人更重视了解个人风险或家族风险以及如何降低风险;(2)按与了解个人风险相关的年龄以及对患黑色素瘤的恐惧划分。参与的一个障碍是对基因组数据处理的不信任。我们的研究结果为参与基因组学研究的动机提供了新的见解,并强调需要更好地针对包括年轻男性在内的人群亚组,这将有助于为未来的基因组研究量身定制招募工作。