Suppr超能文献

为什么数字接触者追踪在不同国家的效果不同?评曹等人的《数字接触者追踪应用过度使用对预防COVID-19的影响:规范激活模型视角》。2022年,,1371。

Why Has Digital Contact Tracing Worked Differently in Different Countries? Comment on Cao et al. The Impact of Digital Contact Tracing Apps Overuse on Prevention of COVID-19: A Normative Activation Model Perspective. 2022, , 1371.

作者信息

Giansanti Daniele

机构信息

Centre Tisp, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00131 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;12(10):1592. doi: 10.3390/life12101592.

Abstract

I am writing you regarding your interesting article "The Impact of Digital Contact Tracing Apps Overuse on Prevention of COVID-19: A Normative Activation Model Perspective" [...].

摘要

我写信给您是关于您那篇有趣的文章《数字接触者追踪应用过度使用对新冠疫情预防的影响:规范激活模型视角》[……]。

相似文献

8
Enforcement of the Use of Digital Contact-Tracing Apps in a Common Law Jurisdiction.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;10(9):1613. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091613.
9
Digital Warfare Against COVID-19: Global Use of Contact-Tracing Apps.
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2021 Nov;33(8):945-948. doi: 10.1177/1010539521999895. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
10
Using Venn Diagrams to Evaluate Digital Contact Tracing: Panel Survey Analysis.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 6;7(12):e30004. doi: 10.2196/30004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验