德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.
机构信息
Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
出版信息
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.
BACKGROUND
The main German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) have implemented digital contact tracing apps to assist the authorities with COVID-19 containment strategies. Low user rates for these apps can affect contact tracing and, thus, its usefulness in controlling the spread of the novel coronavirus.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess the early perceptions of people living in the German-speaking countries and compare them with the frames portrayed in the newspapers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS
We conducted qualitative interviews with 159 participants of the SolPan project. Of those, 110 participants discussed contact tracing apps and were included in this study. We analyzed articles regarding contact tracing apps from 12 newspapers in the German-speaking countries.
RESULTS
Study participants perceived and newspaper coverage in all German-speaking countries framed contact tracing apps as governmental surveillance tools and embedded them in a broader context of technological surveillance. Participants identified trust in authorities, respect of individual privacy, voluntariness, and temporary use of contact tracing apps as prerequisites for democratic compatibility. Newspapers commonly referenced the use of such apps in Asian countries, emphasizing the differences in privacy regulation among these countries.
CONCLUSIONS
The uptake of digital contact tracing apps in German-speaking countries may be undermined due to privacy risks that are not compensated by potential benefits and are rooted in a deeper skepticism towards digital tools. When authorities plan to implement new digital tools and practices in the future, they should be very transparent and proactive in communicating their objectives and the role of the technology-and how it differs from other, possibly similar, tools. It is also important to publicly address ethical, legal, and social issues related to such technologies prior to their launch.
背景
主要的德语国家(德国、奥地利和瑞士)已经实施了数字接触者追踪应用程序,以协助当局实施 COVID-19 防控策略。这些应用程序的低用户使用率可能会影响接触者追踪,从而影响其在控制新型冠状病毒传播方面的有效性。
目的
本研究旨在评估生活在德语国家的人们的早期看法,并将其与 COVID-19 大流行第一波期间报纸上所描绘的框架进行比较。
方法
我们对 SolPan 项目的 159 名参与者进行了定性访谈。其中,110 名参与者讨论了接触者追踪应用程序,并被纳入本研究。我们分析了来自德语国家的 12 家报纸的有关接触者追踪应用程序的文章。
结果
研究参与者认为,所有德语国家的报纸报道都将接触者追踪应用程序视为政府监控工具,并将其嵌入到更广泛的技术监控背景中。参与者将信任当局、尊重个人隐私、自愿性和接触者追踪应用程序的临时使用视为民主兼容性的前提条件。报纸普遍提到了亚洲国家使用此类应用程序的情况,强调了这些国家在隐私法规方面的差异。
结论
由于数字接触者追踪应用程序的隐私风险没有被潜在的好处所弥补,并且这些风险根植于对数字工具的更深层次怀疑,因此这些应用程序在德语国家的采用可能会受到阻碍。当当局计划在未来实施新的数字工具和实践时,他们应该非常透明和积极主动地沟通其目标以及技术的作用——以及它与其他可能类似的工具的区别。在推出这些技术之前,公开解决与之相关的伦理、法律和社会问题也很重要。