• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What Went Wrong with the IMMUNI Contact-Tracing App in Italy? A Cross-Sectional Survey on the Attitudes and Experiences among Healthcare University Students.意大利的IMMUNI接触者追踪应用程序出了什么问题?一项关于医科大学生态度和经历的横断面调查。
Life (Basel). 2022 Jun 10;12(6):871. doi: 10.3390/life12060871.
2
"Immuni" and the National Health System: Lessons Learnt from the COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing in Italy.《Immuni》与国家卫生系统:意大利 COVID-19 数字接触者追踪的经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 20;19(12):7529. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127529.
3
Public Adoption of and Trust in the NHS COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in the United Kingdom: Quantitative Online Survey Study.英国国民保健制度 (NHS) COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的公众采用和信任:定量在线调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 17;23(9):e29085. doi: 10.2196/29085.
4
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
5
A Cluster Analysis of the Acceptance of a Contact Tracing App-The Identification of Profiles for the Italian Immuni Contact Tracing App.一款接触者追踪应用程序接受度的聚类分析——意大利Immuni接触者追踪应用程序的用户画像识别
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 11;10(5):888. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050888.
6
Health Care Students' Knowledge of and Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices Toward the French COVID-19 App: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.医疗保健专业学生对法国 COVID-19 应用程序的认知、态度、信念和实践:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 3;23(3):e26399. doi: 10.2196/26399.
7
A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国对 COVID-19 数字接触追踪的全国性态度调查。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Aug;190(3):863-887. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02389-y. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
8
Using Venn Diagrams to Evaluate Digital Contact Tracing: Panel Survey Analysis.使用文氏图评估数字接触者追踪:面板调查分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 6;7(12):e30004. doi: 10.2196/30004.
9
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
10
Belief of having had unconfirmed Covid-19 infection reduces willingness to participate in app-based contact tracing.认为曾感染过未经确诊的新冠病毒会降低参与基于应用程序的接触者追踪的意愿。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Nov 6;3(1):146. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00357-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Contact tracing in Austria, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, and Kosovo† during the COVID-19 pandemic: response review and good practices.奥地利、格鲁吉亚、吉尔吉斯斯坦、乌克兰和科索沃在 COVID-19 大流行期间的接触者追踪:应对措施回顾和良好做法。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Apr 3;34(2):387-393. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad217.
2
A Deep Dive into the Nexus between Digital Health and Life Sciences Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Editorial Expedition.新冠疫情期间数字健康与生命科学之间的关系深度探究:一篇编辑手记
Life (Basel). 2023 May 10;13(5):1154. doi: 10.3390/life13051154.
3
Attitudes of University Students towards Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Policies: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Rome, Italy.大学生对新冠病毒强制疫苗接种政策的态度:意大利罗马的一项横断面调查
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;11(4):721. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040721.
4
Why Has Digital Contact Tracing Worked Differently in Different Countries? Comment on Cao et al. The Impact of Digital Contact Tracing Apps Overuse on Prevention of COVID-19: A Normative Activation Model Perspective. 2022, , 1371.为什么数字接触者追踪在不同国家的效果不同?评曹等人的《数字接触者追踪应用过度使用对预防COVID-19的影响:规范激活模型视角》。2022年,,1371。
Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;12(10):1592. doi: 10.3390/life12101592.
5
The Impact of Digital Contact Tracing Apps Overuse on Prevention of COVID-19: A Normative Activation Model Perspective.数字接触追踪应用过度使用对COVID-19预防的影响:规范激活模型视角
Life (Basel). 2022 Sep 2;12(9):1371. doi: 10.3390/life12091371.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of contact tracing in the control of infectious diseases: a systematic review.接触者追踪在传染病控制中的效果:系统评价。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e259-e273. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00001-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
2
Digital Contact Tracing and COVID-19: Design, Deployment, and Current Use in Italy.数字接触者追踪与新冠疫情:意大利的设计、部署及当前应用情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;10(1):67. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010067.
3
The association between adherence to cancer screening programs and health literacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症筛查计划依从性与健康素养的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106927. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106927. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Public health effectiveness of digital contact tracing in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of available data.数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 大流行中的公共卫生效果:现有数据的系统评价。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Dec 10;92(S6):e2021439. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12237.
5
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Italian University Students: A Cross-Sectional Survey during the First Months of the Vaccination Campaign.意大利大学生对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:疫苗接种运动开始头几个月的横断面调查
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Nov 7;9(11):1292. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111292.
6
Strategies to increase downloads of COVID-19 exposure notification apps: A discrete choice experiment.增加 COVID-19 接触通知应用程序下载量的策略:离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0258945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258945. eCollection 2021.
7
Digital Contact Tracing Against COVID-19 in Europe: Current Features and Ongoing Developments.欧洲针对新冠疫情的数字接触者追踪:当前特点与持续发展
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jun 17;3:660823. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.660823. eCollection 2021.
8
To Use or Not to Use a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Mixed Methods Survey in Wales.使用还是不使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:威尔士的混合方法调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 22;9(11):e29181. doi: 10.2196/29181.
9
Exploring the drivers and barriers to uptake for digital contact tracing.探索数字接触者追踪的推广驱动因素和障碍。
Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2021;4(1):100212. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100212. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
10
Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Contact Tracing During a Public Health Emergency: A Prospective Implementation Study.从公共卫生紧急事件中的 COVID-19 接触者追踪中吸取的经验教训:一项前瞻性实施研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;9:721952. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.721952. eCollection 2021.

意大利的IMMUNI接触者追踪应用程序出了什么问题?一项关于医科大学生态度和经历的横断面调查。

What Went Wrong with the IMMUNI Contact-Tracing App in Italy? A Cross-Sectional Survey on the Attitudes and Experiences among Healthcare University Students.

作者信息

Isonne Claudia, De Blasiis Maria Roberta, Turatto Federica, Mazzalai Elena, Marzuillo Carolina, De Vito Corrado, Villari Paolo, Baccolini Valentina

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2022 Jun 10;12(6):871. doi: 10.3390/life12060871.

DOI:10.3390/life12060871
PMID:35743902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9225335/
Abstract

The adoption of digital contact-tracing apps to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2 has been sup-optimal, but studies that clearly identify factors associated with the app uptake are still limited. In April 2021, we administered a questionnaire to healthcare university students to investigate their attitudes towards and experiences of the IMMUNI app. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to identify app download predictors. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We surveyed 247 students. Most respondents (65.6%) had not downloaded IMMUNI, reporting as the main reason the perceived app uselessness (32.7%). In the multivariable analysis, being advised to use the app (aOR: 3.21, 95%CI: 1.80-5.73), greater fear of infecting others (aOR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.01-2.23), and greater trust in the institutional response to the emergency (aOR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.00-1.76) were positively associated with the outcome, whereas greater belief in the "lab-leak theory" of COVID-19 was a negative predictor (aOR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.60-0.93). Major technical issues were reported by app users. Targeted strategies aimed at improving awareness of digital health applications should be devised. Furthermore, institutions should invest in the development of these technologies, to minimize technical issues and make them accessible to the entire population.

摘要

采用数字接触追踪应用程序来限制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的传播效果并不理想,但明确识别与应用程序使用相关因素的研究仍然有限。2021年4月,我们对医科大学学生进行了问卷调查,以调查他们对IMMUNI应用程序的态度和使用体验。建立了多变量逻辑回归模型来识别应用程序下载的预测因素。计算了调整后的优势比(aORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。我们调查了247名学生。大多数受访者(65.6%)没有下载IMMUNI,主要原因是认为该应用程序无用(32.7%)。在多变量分析中,被建议使用该应用程序(aOR:3.21,95%CI:1.80-5.73)、更担心感染他人(aOR:1.50,95%CI:1.01-2.23)以及对机构应对紧急情况的信任度更高(aOR:1.33,95%CI:1.00-1.76)与结果呈正相关,而对新冠病毒“实验室泄漏理论”的认可度更高则是一个负向预测因素(aOR:0.75,95%CI:0.60-0.93)。应用程序用户报告了一些主要技术问题。应制定有针对性的策略,以提高对数字健康应用程序的认知度。此外,机构应投资于这些技术的开发,以尽量减少技术问题,并使其能够为全体人群所用。