Pasini Luigi, Vannini Ivan, Ulivi Paola, Tebaldi Michela, Petracci Elisabetta, Fabbri Francesco, Stella Franco, Urbini Milena
Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Sep 23;14(10):2029. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14102029.
In recent years, circulating extracellular miRNAs have emerged as a useful tool for the molecular characterization and study of tumors' biological functions. However, the high heterogeneity in sample processing, isolation of circulating fraction, RNA extraction, and sequencing hamper the reproducibility and the introduction of these biomarkers in clinical practice. In this paper, we compare the content and the performance of miRNA sequencing in plasma-derived samples processed with different isolation protocols. We tested three different fractions of miRNA from healthy-donor human blood: whole plasma (WP), free-circulating (FC) and EV-associated, isolated by either column (ccEV) or size exclusion chromatography (secEV) miRNAs. An additional cohort of 18 lung cancer patients was analyzed. Protein profiles of ccEV and secEV were compared and miRNA expression profiles were assessed through sequencing. Slight differences were found between ccEV and secEV expressions of typical EV markers. Conversely, sequencing performance and the mirnome profile varied between RNA extracted using different isolation methods. Sequencing performance was better in FC samples. Higher varieties of miRNAs were identified in WP and FC with respect to ccEV and secEV. Analysis of free-circulating and EV-associated miRNA profiles in lung cancer patients demonstrated the reliability of the biomarkers identifiable on plasma with these approaches.
近年来,循环细胞外微小RNA(miRNA)已成为肿瘤分子特征分析和生物学功能研究的有用工具。然而,样本处理、循环组分分离、RNA提取和测序方面的高度异质性阻碍了这些生物标志物在临床实践中的可重复性和应用。在本文中,我们比较了用不同分离方案处理的血浆衍生样本中miRNA测序的含量和性能。我们测试了来自健康供体人血的三种不同miRNA组分:全血浆(WP)、游离循环(FC)和与细胞外囊泡(EV)相关的miRNA,后者通过柱分离(ccEV)或尺寸排阻色谱法(secEV)分离。另外分析了18例肺癌患者的队列。比较了ccEV和secEV的蛋白质谱,并通过测序评估了miRNA表达谱。在典型EV标志物的ccEV和secEV表达之间发现了细微差异。相反,使用不同分离方法提取的RNA之间,测序性能和微小RNA组图谱有所不同。FC样本中的测序性能更好。与ccEV和secEV相比,在WP和FC中鉴定出的miRNA种类更多。对肺癌患者游离循环和与EV相关的miRNA图谱分析表明,通过这些方法在血浆中鉴定出的生物标志物具有可靠性。