Suppr超能文献

精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)并非对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)的改进。

The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) Is Not an Improvement Over the DSM.

作者信息

Haeffel Gerald J, Jeronimus Bertus F, Fisher Aaron J, Kaiser Bonnie N, Weaver Lesley Jo, Vargas Ivan, Goodson Jason T, Soyster Peter D, Lu Wei

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame.

Department of Psychology, University of Groningen.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;10(2):285-290. doi: 10.1177/21677026211068873. Epub 2022 Jan 10.

Abstract

In their response to our article (both in this issue), DeYoung and colleagues did not sufficiently address three fundamental flaws with the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). First, HiTOP was created using a simple-structure factor-analytic approach, which does not adequately represent the dimensional space of the symptoms of psychopathology. Consequently, HiTOP is not the empirical structure of psychopathology. Second, factor analysis and dimensional ratings do not fix the problems inherent to descriptive (folk) classification; self-reported symptoms are still the basis on which clinical judgments about people are made. Finally, HiTOP is not ready to use in real-world clinical settings. There is currently no empirical evidence demonstrating that clinicians who use HiTOP have better clinical outcomes than those who use the (). In sum, HiTOP is a factor-analytic variation of the that does not get the field closer to a more valid and useful taxonomy.

摘要

在对我们文章的回应中(均在本期),迪扬及其同事没有充分解决精神病理学层次分类法(HiTOP)的三个基本缺陷。首先,HiTOP是使用简单结构因子分析方法创建的,该方法不能充分代表精神病理学症状的维度空间。因此,HiTOP不是精神病理学的实证结构。其次,因子分析和维度评分并不能解决描述性(民间)分类所固有的问题;自我报告的症状仍然是对人进行临床判断的基础。最后,HiTOP尚未准备好在现实世界的临床环境中使用。目前没有实证证据表明使用HiTOP的临床医生比使用(此处原文缺失内容)的临床医生有更好的临床结果。总之,HiTOP是(此处原文缺失内容)的一种因子分析变体,它并没有使该领域更接近一个更有效和有用的分类法。

相似文献

5
[Introduction to the hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology].[精神病理学的层次分类学导论]
Encephale. 2022 Feb;48(1):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

2
Psychological Clinical Science: Meeting the Challenge of Public Mental Health.《心理临床科学:应对公共心理健康挑战》
Clin Psychol Eur. 2024 Apr 26;6(Spec Issue):e12067. doi: 10.32872/cpe.12067. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

4
An integrative evolutionary framework for psychopathology.一种精神病理学的综合进化框架。
Dev Psychopathol. 2023 Feb;35(1):1-11. doi: 10.1017/S0954579421000870. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
The levels problem in psychopathology.精神病理学中的水平问题。
Psychol Med. 2021 Apr;51(6):927-933. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002514. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验