Zhang Boqian, Zhang Guiyun
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Neurovasclar Intervention and Neurosurgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 10;9:937492. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.937492. eCollection 2022.
Atherosclerotic extracranial carotid artery stenosis accounts for about 20%-30% of all strokes, which is one of the leading causes of adult morbidity and mortality. Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is still the mainly operational manner for atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis/occlusion (ACAS/ACAO), and carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) have been used as an alternative, both CEA and CAS have limitations of their own, such as extensive invasiveness and in-stent restenosis.
In this study we established a novel interventional system to take advantage of both CEA and CAS. Twenty consecutive carotid atherosclerotic plaques were harvested from the patients who underwent CEA. The plaques were randomized into two groups and inserted into the pruned and sutured descending aortas of the swine . The ZebraScope™ was modified with a protective device on its flexible tip, so that the plaque could be dissected from the wall of parent carotid artery and ablated completely without damage to the carotid artery. The holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL) generators were alternately used when needed.
All the carotid atherosclerotic plaques were completely ablated by Ho:YAG laser and/or TFL. The Ho:YAG laser was more effective for the atherosclerotic plaques with severe calcification, while the TFL was more suitable for those with moderate calcification. There were still some thermal injury spots on the inner wall of the parent carotid artery caused by the laser in the non-protected group B. In the protected group A, on the contrary, there was no even a thermal injury spot was found on the relevant location except for one sample. The difference of ablating duration was statistically significant between group A (36.5 ± 4.79 min) and group B (63.4 ± 6.55 min) ( < 0.01).
According to our knowledge, this is the first attempt to ablate carotid atherosclerotic plaques assisted by the ZebraScope™ . The protective and dissecting device on the tip of the angioscope makes it safe and visible when the ablation is performed to carotid atherosclerotic plaques. The Ho:YAG laser and TFL are effective and safe for ablating the plaque .
动脉粥样硬化性颅外颈动脉狭窄约占所有中风的20%-30%,是成人发病和死亡的主要原因之一。尽管颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)仍是治疗动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄/闭塞(ACAS/ACAO)的主要手术方式,而颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)已被用作替代方法,但CEA和CAS都有其自身的局限性,如侵袭性大及支架内再狭窄。
在本研究中,我们建立了一种新型介入系统,以综合利用CEA和CAS的优势。从接受CEA的患者中连续获取20个颈动脉粥样硬化斑块。将这些斑块随机分为两组,并植入经修剪和缝合的猪降主动脉中。对ZebraScope™进行了改良,在其柔性尖端安装了保护装置,以便能将斑块从颈总动脉壁上剥离并完全消融,而不会损伤颈动脉。必要时交替使用钬:钇铝石榴石(Ho:YAG)激光和掺铥光纤激光(TFL)发生器。
所有颈动脉粥样硬化斑块均被Ho:YAG激光和/或TFL完全消融。Ho:YAG激光对严重钙化的粥样硬化斑块更有效,而TFL更适用于中度钙化的斑块。在未受保护的B组中,激光仍在颈总动脉内壁造成了一些热损伤点。相反,在受保护的A组中,除一个样本外,相关位置甚至未发现热损伤点。A组(36.5±4.79分钟)和B组(63.4±6.5分钟)的消融持续时间差异具有统计学意义(<0.01)。
据我们所知,这是首次尝试在ZebraScope™辅助下消融颈动脉粥样硬化斑块。血管内窥镜尖端的保护和剥离装置使对颈动脉粥样硬化斑块进行消融时既安全又可视。Ho:YAG激光和TFL对消融斑块有效且安全。